🧵 Mathematical proof why you should fuck your sister
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 01:24:26 UTC No. 16472673
People say "don't fuck your sister, it will ruin the genes" but actually it's the opposite, and in this post I will explain why.
Let's start with the conventional view. Genes can break because of mutations. However normally if we have one faulty gene copy, the other healthy gene copy can compensate. This situation is known as a recessive genetic disease. It's recessive because the healthy copy will "dominate" the unhealthy copy. Not all genetic diseases are recessive but it's the most common one.
Now imagine that your dad had one healthy gene G and a very rare broken gene g. Your mom had two healthy genes. Now there is a 50% chance you got your dads broken gene. But since you got a healthy one from your mom you are fine. Your little sister also had 50% chance of getting the broken gene, but she will be fine either way for the same reason. Together, it's a 25% chance you both have a broken gene.
If you either of you have a kid with a non-relative then its overwhelmingly likely that your kids will get a healthy gene from the non-relative. But if you have kids with each other, that's when problems arise. The kid may get one broken copy from you and one from your sister, leading to a sick child.
Now imagine there is not one such broken gene but several. Suddenly there may be big risk of issues.
So as promised let's turn this on its head.
Consider again what happens in the above scenario. The broken gene is masked which lets it proliferate.
But now imagine yourself fucking your cute sister. If the healthy genes combine then the broken gene has been eliminated! Success! If the broken genes are combined and the child has issues, then the child will be less able to pass the broken gene on! Partial success! However it may still happen that a child gets one broken and one healthy gene. This means that although the bad gene is selected against, it still has some chance of slipping through.
This is why fucking your sister leads to better genes in the long term!
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 01:26:07 UTC No. 16472679
It should be noted that the rate of incestuous unions should however be kept under control. If brother marries sister generation after generation then it is no good. It should be something that happens occasionally to rarely.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 13:10:22 UTC No. 16473310
>>16472673
What if you compared you and your sisters genes, if both of you have a gene that's defective, replace it with a non-defective copy from someone else. Repeat for entirety of your genomes.
Your offspring will now be very strongly related to you both, without the defects that would give rise to problems.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 13:13:25 UTC No. 16473311
>>16472673
Yuck.
>smoking
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 13:19:02 UTC No. 16473316
>>16472673
>But now imagine yourself fucking your cute sister. If the healthy genes combine then the broken gene has been eliminated! Success! If the broken genes are combined and the child has issues, then the child will be less able to pass the broken gene on! Partial success! However it may still happen that a child gets one broken and one healthy gene. This means that although the bad gene is selected against, it still has some chance of slipping through.
>This is why fucking your sister leads to better genes in the long term!
I understand now. A eugenics program by quantum bogosort: The only child that survives is the with miraculously perfect genes.
Now Pakistan makes sense, an entire country of inbred cousin-fuckers trying to make the Overman.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 13:24:33 UTC No. 16473323
>>16473316
this would hold water if the pakistan example was imposing selection for positive traits
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 13:24:51 UTC No. 16473324
>>16473316
10 steps ahead
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 13:35:46 UTC No. 16473333
I don't know about inbreeding but continued outbreeding seems to lead to catastrophic population collapses
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 15:15:21 UTC No. 16473438
>>16472673
You're not wrong. Inbreeding simply converts recessive defects into dominant ones. Natural selection in such a situation will indeed select out recessive defects and purify the gene pool, resulting in a population that can far more safely engage in inbreeding. This is why there are so many species with incredibly small populations, yet they avoid extinction.
OP at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 15:24:36 UTC No. 16473446
>>16473438
The issue with too small populations is that the population can get unlucky and completely lose all copies of the healthy gene. My pet hypothesis is that guarding against this is why some plants are polyploidal.
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 23:23:52 UTC No. 16474004
>>16473446
how would polyploidy help there?
entire duplicated chromosomes creating more redundancy?
Also I think the sister fucking angle is a bit too risky you're relying heavily on drift and luck, if you wanted to see actual selection against deleterious mutations it might be better to think in terms of larger closed communities or breeding pools that allow enough diversity to be adaptive but are also throwing up recessives often enough probability wise that they can be purged out.
Alternatively there are studies where populations thought to be carrying high mutational load are mated to siblings every couple of generations I used to have a couple papers saved about zoo animals.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 00:19:27 UTC No. 16474087
>>16473316
>A eugenics program by quantum bogosort
>Now pakistan makes sense
>cousin-fuckers trying to make an overman
holy kek my sides
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 01:00:22 UTC No. 16474133
>>16472673
tf no Ashley Graves sisterfu
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 01:02:50 UTC No. 16474134
If they dont have children there is really no moral argument against it
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 02:02:18 UTC No. 16474204
>>16472673
it's more like
>don't fuck your sister, it will ruin the fenotype
and it's true, you owned yourself here:
>If the broken genes are combined and the child has issues, then the child will be less able to pass the broken gene on
of course, because the child is doomed with a congenital ailment i.e. ruined fenotype
OP is a fag, as always, and probably gets pegged by his sister.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 14:18:00 UTC No. 16474782
>>16474204
>fenotype
is that a cat thing?
I thought op's point was that by not exposing the bad genes regularly through iautozygosity they can spread through the population undetected?
the idea is to make them visible and eliminate them which improves the fitness of the genepool because the deleterious mutational is much reduced.
This principal is used effectively in animal breeding.
Stop guessing start learning at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 23:32:09 UTC No. 16475375
>>16472673
Ok genius expirement with your sister and post the results.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 23:37:21 UTC No. 16475384
Incest is disgusting unless it's between identical twins. Then it's based and hot.
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 00:31:31 UTC No. 16475451
>>16472673
>sci
>science and math
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 07:32:27 UTC No. 16475800
>>16473316
pakistanis, jeets and arabs do incest because it leads to family harmony, like your mother in law is already your aunty, that sort of thing. They have many retards, they would do fine if they just let them stay single but they all get arranged marriages for them. Retards marrying retards. It continues until they get so damaged they die in the womb due to absurd genetics
Incest+Abortion+Killing dumb kids=Win
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 07:49:39 UTC No. 16475806
>>16474204
Go back to plebbit nigger. The chance of your child having defect is almost the same with a stranger.
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 11:43:05 UTC No. 16475966
>>16475800
You don't exactly have to abort or kill all you need is to prevent them from reproducing.
not easy in a culture where you expect all women to breed
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 13:18:12 UTC No. 16476047
thread pinned