Image not available

603x1024

1731012839996431m.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16472798

How is this possible?

Anonymous No. 16474628

>>16472798
You're a nigger

Anonymous No. 16474753

>>16472798
Maybe they think the question is about the image being tilted, not the thing it represents.

Anonymous No. 16474766

>>16472798
I've seen many men draw it incorrectly on twitter too while disparaging the women in the study.

Nearly everyone gets the actual height of the liquid level wrong. Of course everyone knows that it's flat relative to the ground, that's not the question. The point is estimating the change in height from incompressible liquid.

Image not available

603x588

IMG_20241114_201659.jpg

Anonymous No. 16474815

It would be like this wouldn't it?

Anonymous No. 16474859

>>16474815
Roughly yes.

Most people who are wrong draw it precisely level with the original. This is because they draw from experience when tipping the glass in their hand (with the tip of the glass being below the original starting level of the glass), but this is not the same as tipping it on a table, here the bottom tip of the glass stays on the same level.

Anonymous No. 16474976

>>16474815
> Didn’t read the text in the OP and would have failed the test
Your new water level needs to be parallel with the old water level

Image not available

603x1024

1731466192755973.jpg

Anonymous No. 16474995

>>16474815
Wrong.

Anonymous No. 16475332

>>16474766
>The point is estimating the change in height from incompressible liquid.
That is not the point at all.

Anonymous No. 16475336

>>16474995
>Instruction: draw line
>DRaWs cUrVE
Good job woman