Image not available

1280x720

IMG_2794.jpg

🧡 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16473076

Should university admissions be race-neutral?

Anonymous No. 16473184

>>16473076
University admissions should be based on merit and nothing else. That something basic like this is a point of contention in the United Walmarts of Lardistan is a great indicator of how barbaric and uncivilized the whole place is. Vapid tribalistic baboons who only care about money and virtue signaling.
t. yuro

Anonymous No. 16473352

>>16473184
So, you're fine with one in 4 white people not getting admitted anymore?

Anonymous No. 16473379

>>16473352
if they did not have the merit for it why should they get a pass?

Anonymous No. 16473474

>>16473076
>>16473352
This should has the caveat of Harvard and other US schools accepting numerous foreign applicants, which skew the numbers. Seeing asians play the racebait game is kinda funny though.

Anonymous No. 16473580

>>16473474
So, you want Harvard to hire even more foreigners?

Anonymous No. 16473582

>>16473580
Who cares?

Anonymous No. 16473592

>>16473352
yes university is a scam
generational wealth and charismatic insanity will get you much further

as proven by trump

πŸ—‘οΈ Anonymous No. 16473613

>>16473352
>Be "white" american
>Care more about TickTock and nigger culture than math
>Don't get into Harvard
>Be asian-american
>Care about math, parents punish you for deviating from your studies and disown you for indulging in nigger culture
>Get into Harvard
What's wrong with this?

Anonymous No. 16473617

>>16473352
Harvard doesn't use a merit based system.

https://college.harvard.edu/admissions/why-harvard/diversity-and-access

Harvard specifically selects against White people to increase diversity.

Anonymous No. 16473904

>>16473613
Is this how slopes cope with having to leave their own cesspits for a liveable country

Image not available

600x480

4cb74274a9d3cdbd5....jpg

Anonymous No. 16473912

>>16473617
>Harvard specifically selects against White people to increase diversity.

Anonymous No. 16475161

>>16473592
so why aren't you working on your charisma and trying to marry into a rich family instead of studying soience?

Anonymous No. 16475206

>(((white)))

Anonymous No. 16475249

>>16473076
Only if (((legacy))) admissions are banned too.
The process should be entirely anonymous. Face to face interviews should not be a thing either, as to reduce corruption.

Anonymous No. 16475259

>>16473076
wtf what year is it???

Anonymous No. 16475274

>>16473912
This is obviously old because if you made it today it would be all poos.

Anonymous No. 16475317

>>16473076
Those that attach themselves to the legal and economic tit of the US government should have never not been, post CRA.
>>16475249
There's no law I'm aware of that says parents can't give preferential treatment their kids.

Anonymous No. 16475353

>>16475317
>There's no law I'm aware of that says parents can't give preferential treatment their kids.
Equal opportunity is a federal law that applies to all government agencies and government-funded institutions. That includes private universities. It’s de facto not enforced, but the recent ruling of the Supreme Court against affirmative action is a step in the right direction.

Anonymous No. 16475356

I like the Japanese more than the Jews
>no jews on chart

Anonymous No. 16475368

>>16475274
all the illegal mexicans in america are currently running to canada before trump cuts off their gibes, so the pic will need to be updated again in the near future

Anonymous No. 16475370

>>16475353
The law only attaches to sweeping generalizations like race and sex that sacrifice the merits of an individual on the cross of group averages which, true or not, have nothing to do with any actual person or family.

Anonymous No. 16475456

>>16473379
Youvastly overestimate the effect of "merit".
A black student coming from a classic dysfunctional black family with a missing father, who manages to maintain good grades across the board and has a couple personal projects or leadership experiences in his pocket has, to me at least, much more merit, than your average asian-american enrolled in berkeley purely because they were put since a young age in expensive private schools and forced to go through dozens of extracurricular and never really lived a childhood beyond the pursuit of greatness and beating others at everything. These people are massively overrepresented in academia because we think they have merit, but it should have become clear that to this day, most of the greatest innovations and research outcomes came from whites, who usually have lived through a much more balanced childhood and werent raised to be the virtually the best at everything, but to actually do what they like and are good at.

How many asians at MIT/Harvard/Stanford? And how many of them are successful scientists recognized by their peers, or excellent entrepreneurs who dont just follow every tech hype cycle? The latter is almost always white people regardless of the overrepresentation of Asians.

Anonymous No. 16475462

>>16473076
why let women and niggers in. what a waste of resources

Anonymous No. 16475494

>>16473076
No, they should be race-based. No, really. Lets see who's got what. Although, it is rather telling that EVERYONE from around the world wants to go to White, Western Schools and has dreamed of doing so for hundreds and hundreds of years.

Where is the Chinese Harvard? Where is the Semitic Oxford? Where is the African MIT? Where is the Aztec Yale? Where is the Indian Julliard? No where. That's where ;)

How is it that BILLIONS of Yellow, Black and Brown people can't create a single University that is elite and can endure and stand the test of time while those savage barbarians have more than can be counted?

Gringos win again!

Anonymous No. 16475506

>>16475494
If there were a market to bet on whether racebased schools or nonracebased schools would matriculate more or less successful graduates, I'd bet against racebased every time.

Anonymous No. 16475507

>>16475494
>EVERYONE from around the world wants to go to White, Western Schools and has dreamed of doing so for hundreds and hundreds of years.
If by "hundreds" of years, you mean ~75 years, and by "White Western Schools", you mean elite American universities and like 2 Bongoloid universities, then sure.

You can't include second rate slop like Australian, Canadian, mainland European universities without also including other countries.

Anonymous No. 16475514

>>16475507
European enlightenment is all about degenerate lawyers and latin scribes talking shit to each other. No one involved ever cared about prison colonies until they all fled here.

Anonymous No. 16475565

>>16473076
California did this all the way back in 1996 and the only thing that happened was the universities filled up with Asians
https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/1996/prop209_11_1996.html

Anonymous No. 16475569

>>16475456
>And how many of them are successful scientists recognized by their peers
Considering the advisors I'm looking at for grad school in math, most of them lol

Anonymous No. 16475571

>>16475494
Baghdad, Andalusia used to be that, at some point the middle east was the place to go for scholars, and arguably chinese universities are miles ahead in terms of rigorous education today,the average kids in shenzhen mog the average MIT kid in terms of building shit.