🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 13:43:45 UTC No. 16473339
There’s a host of paradoxes that have been identified that would arise if backwards time travel was possible. However, I thought of one that I haven’t heard in the mainstream yet.
If, by some mechanism, a person or object hypothetically travelled backwards in time to meet its past self, you now have duplicates of that person or object. Doesn’t that violate the law of conservation of mass?
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 13:46:32 UTC No. 16473341
>>16473339
>retarded what if scenarios on a science board
there is no conservation of mass. Only total energy is conserved. Mass can be converted to momentum just like every other type of potential energy can be converted to kinetic energy.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 10:07:31 UTC No. 16474569
>>16473339
Time is not a thing or a place.
You cannot travel through it.
It is a process of state changes.
There is only here and now.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 10:55:12 UTC No. 16474587
>>16473339
Time travel is, in fact, possible. "Time" is just a sequence of states, and "time travel" is just recreating various past states.
Metaphorically speaking, of you flick a light switch on, then off, then on again, you have travelled through time. It's trivial.
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 11:08:55 UTC No. 16474597
Niggers in three states of matter in and around your bunghole