Anonymous at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 13:16:59 UTC No. 16474721

No idea who this guy is

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 13:22:31 UTC No. 16474730

The pea barm of scientists.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 13:46:20 UTC No. 16474751

>>16474527
He's fine and actually knows what he's talking about, but you can also see that he also knows that half of what he's talking about if "theoretical" and never actually been formally proven despite literally millions of hours and billions of dollars worth of effort. Sort of like a priest that has lost his religion, but doesn't have the heart to tell his congregation.

Everyone of these "Particle Physics" bros is starting to realize that their entire paradigm is wrong and always has been, but they don't have the courage to admit it, and have nothing better to replace the current "Standard Model" with, so they just keep preaching "The Good Word" until something better comes along.

Sad, really.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 14:05:34 UTC No. 16474773

>>16474751
hello sabine shill. Go back to plebbit

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 16:08:12 UTC No. 16474895

>>16474773

Sabine is a kook, but she and I both know a lot more about Physics than you do :)

Go ahead provide us with the "Unified Field Theory" that connects QM and Relativity once and for all. It's been a "bit of an issue" for a while now, but you can clear that up, right? Give it to us, Boss :)

John the fisherman at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 16:20:59 UTC No. 16474904

Must kill crowdfunding science for my evil masters

Satan forbids they develop amateur vaccine testing b4 our pandemic plan

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 16:58:08 UTC No. 16474947

>>16474527
He's hot so it's ok in my book.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 18:19:44 UTC No. 16475022

>>16474895
If you are in the right, how come you are on the fringes of the scientific community? Why is their so little support from other scientists who, I would assume the majority of, want to further their fields just the same? I don't think the nerds who spend most of their time thinking about particles are conspiring to prop up theories they believe are wrong just to save face. Explain it to me.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 19:32:24 UTC No. 16475108

>>16474751
>Everyone of these "Particle Physics" bros is starting to realize that their entire paradigm is wrong and always has been, but they don't have the courage to admit it,
Every time some scientists goes on a camera to talk about this they say the standard model is fine and GR is fine but theres a problem when combining them. They all say theres a problem, no one lacks any courage to say it and it requires no courage to say it as its a common idea

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 19:52:25 UTC No. 16475141

>>16475108
They won't have the balls to say our cosmology is certainly wrong because we can't resolve such fundamental problems.

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 01:18:15 UTC No. 16475504

>>16475022

I'm not on a fringe. I just know they don't know what they're talking about. Arguing from consensus and authority are the LEAST SCIENTIFIC arguments a person can make, which proves you have no argument at all.

I win again!

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 01:22:22 UTC No. 16475508

>>16475108
No, they duck, dodge, dive and deflect from all fundamental questions of Cosmology, QM, GR, etc....anyone can learn these things and learn their GLARING limitations and leaps in logic.

"Particle Physics", "String Theory", etc....are academic Cults where people put aside their dispassionate, rational minds in favor of "defending" whatever little camp they happen to fall into when they wrote their dissertation, but they all know they're on very shaky foundations that no one is ever encouraged to question, or explore. It's pure intellectual cowardice and they've been doing if for nearly 100 years nonstop with basically nothing to show for it. Einstein and Dirac could come back tomorrow and get "caught up" on all the "cutting edge" research in a week :/ LOL!


Meanwhile, real Doctors are curing cancers, creating robotic limbs, growing organs in jars and things that are actually interesting, useful and can be proven under laboratory conditions. What a novel concept?

I win again.

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 01:59:03 UTC No. 16475538

>>16474527
He needs to start using his middle name or "Dr." or fuck off and stop confusing people.

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 05:57:06 UTC No. 16475746

>>16475508
>No, they duck, dodge, dive and deflect from all fundamental questions of Cosmology, QM, GR, etc....anyone can learn these things and learn their GLARING limitations and leaps in logic.
They dont, its widely recognized but theres just nothing to do about it. You act as if theres solutions that are not accepted because scientists are just meanies and stuck ups but if that was true then just wait a generation because these things get solved when young people as they are not stuck. But theres no current solution to the problem
>>16475141
>They won't have the balls to say our cosmology is certainly wrong
They say it all the time. They would talk about dark matter and energy, say they dont have a solution, that its an open problem and thats the current state

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 08:28:20 UTC No. 16475823

>>16474527
I have no idea about his academic career but he’s a great science communicator.

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 09:00:46 UTC No. 16475843

>>16474895
>Go ahead provide us with the "Unified Field Theory" that connects QM and Relativity once and for all.
why would I need it?

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 10:35:43 UTC No. 16475895

>>16475746
>They would talk about dark matter and energy, say they dont have a solution, that its an open problem and thats the current state

They talk about a repeatedly failed-to-verify fudge factor yet they still talk like it's there, it's just not discovered yet.

Imagine if I as a radiologist took an x-ray of a patients finger and said
>"this patient have cancer, it's just invisible, we need more tests".
Then we take a full body CT
>"we found nothing buit we're sure the cancer is there"
Full body 1.5T MRI later
>"We're facing technical limitations to detecting the cancer that's there, but not visible"
Full body 3T MRI
>"I understand the skepticism but cancer have to be there"
Five years and 500 examinations later, including some research lab 7 Tesla exams and liters of blood examined with no conclusion.
>"We know the cancer is there, it's our best theory so we'll have to stick with it!"

That's how modern cosmology have been for the last several decades. A total leftist intolerance to admitting an error that someone with an ounce of prestige once made.

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 13:38:37 UTC No. 16476070

>>16475022
>on the fringes of the scientific community?
Taboos, government intervention. Just look at heritability of intelligence, it's on the fringe yet is blatantly true.
In the case of modern physics, the government funds projects like CERN to keep native scientists working for the west, rather than getting bored and working for the USSR or it's successors, then potentially discovering a better nuclear bomb.
All these pointless projects are just welfare for scientists to prevent them working for our governments' enemies.

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 19:47:06 UTC No. 16476676

>>16475504
Your implication that you know more than the dickheads with Phds is pathetic and you've yet to say anything of substance.
I don't understand why you are so distrustful of scientists, they're just eggheads doing research bro.

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 21:02:48 UTC No. 16476826

>>16475508
>GLARING limitations and leaps in logic.
Name one

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 22:01:46 UTC No. 16476936

>>16474527
>pahhticles
kek

🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 22:08:49 UTC No. 16476949

>>16474527
I don't like pop-sci shit but I like him and Kaku due to their great academic careers

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 22:15:53 UTC No. 16476955

I hate pop-sci shit but I like him and Kaku due to their academic careers. In fact I respect anyone with a Prof. title in a high IQ field like physics and math also engineering somewhat

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 23:35:59 UTC No. 16477070

>>16474527
All popular science types are given-up scientists.
You know you have nothing to contribute but still have to make a living somehow and wasted way too much time pursuing science to change course at this point

Raphael at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:40:02 UTC No. 16477211

>>16474947
He aged well

Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:44:44 UTC No. 16477222

>>16476955
What did he do in his career? I know Michio Kaku was very influential in string theory