Anonymous at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 20:30:54 UTC No. 16475199

>>16475176
Reneweable energy, aerospace shit that isn’t MIC or SpaceX

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 20:36:33 UTC No. 16475207

>>16475199
>Reneweable energy
Reminder that Elon is down with solar and RFK is anti-nuclear.

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 20:38:56 UTC No. 16475210

>>16475176
My lizard on treadmill studies!
Noooooo!!!!

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 20:46:36 UTC No. 16475221

>>16475199
aerospace will never get cut. Boeing is shitting the bed and it's a good source of soft power. I wouldn't be surprised if Boom or Overture got a grant

Anonymous at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 20:54:36 UTC No. 16475227

>>16475221
>I wouldn't be surprised if Boom or Overture got a grant
Neither possess any IP of value to the MIC, even in the context of Boeing shitting the bed. Locksneed and Northrop are the companies with supersonic and stealth aircraft IP and experience relevant to the MIC. Boeing's expertise is airliners, which neither Boom nor Overture have a credible future in.

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 03:23:22 UTC No. 16475611

>>16475227
>Boeing's expertise is airliners
former expertise
present day boeing no longer has that expertise
they can barely reproduce decades old designs successfully

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 03:26:47 UTC No. 16475614

>>16475199
>Reneweable energy
good
>aerospace shit
On the rare occasion NASA does something useful it takes them decades and costs billions more than it should have. If you're interested in space exploration you'd delete NASA entirely and hand its budget to SpaceX (or some other private entity if Elon triggers you too much)

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 03:37:37 UTC No. 16475631

>>16475176
Probably easier to list the fields that won't get drastic cuts. Petroleum engineering, for example.

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 04:56:14 UTC No. 16475715

>>16475176

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 06:56:40 UTC No. 16475785

>>16475176
Gila monsters