Image not available

428x309

gayradius1.png

🧵 analysis sucks

Anonymous No. 16475612

retard field of math for fembrained wordcels who cant rotate shapes
literally just give the right answer
all of analysis could have been done by a blacked out kazakh with a napkin and a pen
algebraists are the only real mathematicians

Image not available

960x720

slide_1.jpg

Stop guessing start learning No. 16475621

>>16475612
Ok idiot you do realize mathematics has application to physical things it's not just abstract shapes on a piece of paper.

Your just learning the basics so you have the fundamentals to apply it to real world applications it's not gonna be just shapes on a piece of paper

Anonymous No. 16475624

>>16475621
you can get the right answer in the real world too you fucking monkey

Image not available

600x510

1634528383890.png

Anonymous No. 16475627

Analysis is for the gigachads, algebra is for the trannies.

Anonymous No. 16475669

>>16475612
case in point for why infinitists are so fucking retarded: there is clearly no correct answer here. think your getting "closer", huh? fucking midwit. length is the ratio of magnitudes. the degreea ny quantity (wording not a mistake -- pay attention) balances rests on the well foundednes of rational geometry, yet imbiciles like you ignorantly prattle about the ""raidus of ocnvergence" and "the right answer" despite MISSING THE MARK (SIN!!!!)

"So whoever knows the right thing to do and fails to do it, for him it is sin." (James 4:17, ESV)

Anonymous No. 16475804

>>16475669
>ESV
of course a finitist reads this edition

Anonymous No. 16475894

>>16475612
I call it Freud’s stages of mathematical development
>algebra and category theory
Oral stage. You’re a baby playing with legos in your head because all that “beauty” reminds you of your mom.
>analysis
It’s in the name. Anal stage. Very masochistic yet unrewarding activity where analcels seethe at physicists for using “illegal” methods only for them to codify all those methods in thick tomes of unreadable crap years after it’s been heuristically figured out.
>geometry
Phallic stage. What do people draw the first opportunity they get? Dicks. Characterized by self-obsession; a geometer will ignore algebraic or analytic proofs because they don’t involve drawing dicks.
>topology
Latent. The topologist suddenly realizes that drawing dicks is gay and he can just calculate the homotopy groups of dicks instead and go do something else. This is the stage when all three previous stages start molding themselves into something coherent.
>number theory
Genital stage. A number theorist finally gets to apply his knowledge to the most simple yet beautiful structure in math: natural numbers. To woo and tame her would require all his expertise in the previous four fields. Despite her simplicity, she’s one prude bitch and won’t let you prove theorems about her without some serious work. The end result is very satisfying yet you feel a certain emptiness in you. All that work just to prove a theorem a child can understand? Nut clarity hits. You lose interest yet soon you see a new theorem about her. That theorem is easy to understand, but hard to crack. You feel the urge to prove it. The horniness cycle repeats.

Anonymous No. 16476642

>>16475612
>kazakh
Rent free in your mind

Image not available

526x492

angel.jpg

Anonymous No. 16477421

>>16475669
wildberger was right

Image not available

605x543

I love useless math.png

Anonymous No. 16477434

>>16475612
This is so true. Seriously, find me an example where only analysis can be used instead of just drawing it on a piece of paper. Also what applications are there for Thomae's function

Image not available

1691x3840

1600819154551.jpg

Anonymous No. 16477436

>>16475612
analysts unironically believe that there exist dark numbers that cant be computed nor approximated to perfect precision, but which can be limited towards with perfect precision

Anonymous No. 16477438

>>16475894
Im never leaving

Anonymous No. 16477443

>>16475894
>LOOK MOM I FOUND ANOTHER INTEGER SOLUTION TO A HIGH SCHOOL EQUATION!
Who cares. It’s baroque math.

Anonymous No. 16477628

>>16475612
>>16475612
This is the same kind of retarded thinking that leads Republicans to cutting funding for research. Everything seems so obvious to you, doesn't it? Like how Sarah Palin "knew" studying drosophilia was a waste of time. It's never crossed your feeble mind that there could exist something which escapes immediate recognition. I bet you're a fascist too, OP. This is the core of fascism: anti-intellectualism, the rejection of any level of thought beyond what a five year old can grasp. It's sad, really; clearly you've had exposure to science, and yet you choose to wallow in your filth and ignorance. Yet more proof against democracy. Cast not pearls before swine.

Anonymous No. 16477633

>>16477436
Yet another nazi imbecile. You think mathematicians are in the business of discovering facts about numbers. You're too stupid or lazy to learn analysis, so you retreat to the elementary school math you can grasp. "Infinity isn't real, only numbers I see are real." Oh? Tell me, where is "2"? Where is "1/2"? You morons think numbers are objects instead of concepts for tracking facts. Infinity is invalid? No, it is YOU who is the invalid. Pray tell, which is the correct language, Russian or Chinese? Meaningless.

Anonymous No. 16478362

>>16477633
Try to compute exp(10**10**10**100) in any calculator, you mongrel.