Image not available

842x820

.png

๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16475615

Is objectivity in science overrated?

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-024-02139-3.epdf?sharing_token=xsIx8mVMmiNsyth005trfNRgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0MNa4-nF0V06s2-ZuWlBT-D7kk-X1w9_s4Vc4UmoipqhSCsOn1QgKuusCSnsBqoEO9OjWs1kvCZuiDKMSAP89OwQbelzL_rtXF03g9O8qoUKp7rz860yWEcfRt6dzqIsuFsrFOwWMt4OC-3gNMM5q44Zp02Wp6ZbFMRtDha77qttgu-lgu3e5rZ_PiyvhlABMM%3D&tracking_referrer=www.theguardian.com

Image not available

2392x1586

asdf.png

Anonymous No. 16475617

In case the link doesn't work

pdfs with fucking DRM < the screenshot key

Image not available

641x355

1731623461534717.png

Stop guessing start learning No. 16475632

>>16475615
Lol. It's a fact that we are destroying the planet the world economic forum and the united nations has constant literature on the subject and almost daily publications. It's easy to get mad as a science understanding how stupid we are running into our own doom. Yet no one wants to admit this because this fact conflicts with our economic growth. Scaling back our toxic economy will crash it and no one wants to deal with that unpleasant reality.

So Jim we will ride this mother fucker till the wheels fall off

Anonymous No. 16475654

>>16475632
Adding CO2 to the atmosphere only makes nature healthier and more productive