Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 08:34:52 UTC No. 16475829

birth defects do not a distinct biological sex make.

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 09:02:54 UTC No. 16475844

>>16475829
Science used scientific method and says they do

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 10:15:15 UTC No. 16475878

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 11:24:21 UTC No. 16475943

>>16475878
You arr trolling a science thread because you’re a chud incel. Stick to the science as op did or leave

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 12:48:08 UTC No. 16476012

>>16475794
Not once in human history has anyone produced both large gametes and small gametes. You can only produce one or the other or none at all, and everyone healthy produces something at some point in their lives. These facts give a very natural definition of sex that includes precisely two genders.

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 17:33:06 UTC No. 16476462

>>16475794
this is how you get Trump and RFK.

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 17:45:33 UTC No. 16476479

>>16475794
Was the choice of 57 random or is that something the subculture uses? The reason why I ask is back in the 1990s, there was a minor trend of people of mixed race to call themselves "Heinz 57", both because that liquid is a medium brown but also because there are so many different ways to be a mix of races that they said it was around 57 of them. It would be interesting if that number was reused for the current cultural narrative, especially if it wasn't coincidental but was due to some entity somewhere having a preference for that number.

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 17:46:51 UTC No. 16476483

https://archive.today/DeWxL

Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 18:05:32 UTC No. 16476510

>>16476012
>You can only produce one or the other or none at all,
Sounds like a trinary :^)