🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 11:40:09 UTC No. 16475964
press F to pay respects for her wonderful world bringing science to americans
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 14:43:19 UTC No. 16476155
>>16475964
The media's influence on the public is starting to wane. Time to get out of that grift and find a new one before the funding dries up.
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 15:26:39 UTC No. 16476259
>>16475964
so this was the bitch that gutted SciAm?
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 18:31:13 UTC No. 16476570
>>16475964
Another psychologist pretending to be a scientist and ruining the reputation of science.
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 18:42:47 UTC No. 16476592
>>16476259
It's the way of business majors. Show up for four years, gut the system, put on your CV how much you've changed the system and get a new position. It works for chancellors and provosts as well. Fuck up a university. Take millions in salary. "Retire" meaning you stay salaried from university #1 and move on to another university pulling double salary while fuckin that one too and so on. It's a ponzi scheme at this point.
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 19:04:51 UTC No. 16476621
>>16475964
My wife used to love magazines until exactly 10 years ago when they all went insane. Her vomit reflex has saved me thousands of dollars a year. The entire Conde Nast portfolio devolved into political garbage in the fall of 2015
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 04:38:58 UTC No. 16477485
>>16476621
>Conde Nast
Owned by the same jew who owns Reddit.
Donald Newhouse, his father who he inherited the publishing empire from was the American version of Robert Maxwell with the same connection to Mossad
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 14:33:28 UTC No. 16477819
>>16475964
Is this another rag that endorsed Harris? They used to have good articles 50 years ago.
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 08:25:47 UTC No. 16478718
>>16476621
Correct.
It was really bad.
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 22:09:28 UTC No. 16484089
>>16475964
Retarded American
>>16481060
Goats are cool
🗑️ Anonymous at Wed, 20 Nov 2024 00:15:55 UTC No. 16485455
>>16476609
I can not understand WHY people are 'devastated' by this USA election.
The SAME two parties have been running the USA for almost 200 years.
One party ran a former President and the other a Vice-President.
HTF is the result 'devastating?"... why so overly dramatic?
Non-Americans have difficulty seeing ANY differences between the parties.
Why would a Science editor feel ANY reason to comment on an election?
🗑️ Anonymous at Wed, 20 Nov 2024 00:26:30 UTC No. 16485479
>>16485455
>Non-Americans have difficulty seeing ANY differences between the parties.
I don’t know man, parties aside, people in my country got plenty worked up over Cheeto Hitler working for Russia and gassing all the gays
🗑️ Anonymous at Wed, 20 Nov 2024 00:31:45 UTC No. 16485494
>>16485479
>Cheeto Hitler working for Russia and gassing all the gays
Except this never happened or will ever happen.
He is a 'middle of the road' conservative business man that entered politics later in life.
Why are people so gullible that any lie their media tells them they blindly believe?
What is a 4chan at Wed, 20 Nov 2024 00:40:05 UTC No. 16485513
>>16476621
Look at that leaf. Literally the domain of God.
🗑️ Anonymous at Wed, 20 Nov 2024 00:48:11 UTC No. 16485531
>>16485494
>Why are people so gullible that any lie their media tells them they blindly believe?
An obvious question given the past 8 years, and finally all this data on Twitter and other places. It’s crazy how social scientists aren’t jumping in make themselves useful for once.
🗑️ Anonymous at Wed, 20 Nov 2024 01:05:58 UTC No. 16485585
>>16485494
He's more of a center left populist that isn't afraid to touch the weird electric fences our media decided to put up around open borders and security state worship, both of which are traditionally opposed by liberals, not conservatives.
>Why are people so gullible that any lie their media tells them they blindly believe?
I think it's just that most people don't even have opinions about many political issues until they hear the first "urgent" argument for one side or the other.
🗑️ Anonymous at Wed, 20 Nov 2024 18:51:26 UTC No. 16486728
>>16485494
>conservative
lol
🗑️ Anonymous at Wed, 20 Nov 2024 19:05:54 UTC No. 16486749
>>16486684
NTA but the rest of the paragraph is pretty dumb, too. We already keep track of two women's marathon world records: mixed and women only. Both are (obviously) slower than the men's record.
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Nov 2024 19:24:35 UTC No. 16486784
The only endurance race with a large enough sample size to conclude women are better at that particular sport is long distance swimming, where it is thought their natural upper body buoyancy gives them a biological edge. The other sports are too niche to determine if there's a gender difference or individual difference.
Males and females are built different, something understood by humanity until a few years ago when a small slice of it went insane. As long distance swimming shows, it is possible for an athletic competition to exist where the biology of females gives them an edge over males. But that's not what activists are pushing. They want everyone to believe that females are as good at basketball as males, which simply isn't the case. When you show that head to head males destroy females in such competitions, they claim that's because females aren't given the same resources as males instead of observing the obvious biological differences that give males a performance edge.
It's weird that they keep pushing on things that are obviously untrue instead of focusing on creating athletic competitions that advantage female biology. Long distance swimming is one such competition. There are some like Netball that males rarely play so we don't know if females are better than males or not. We do know that in sports like football, males are better due to biology. It seems unlikely that long distance swimming is the only possibility for a female advantaged sport but activists don't like putting in hard work to create, they just want to wear the skinsuit of what others have created and call it their own.
🗑️ Anonymous at Wed, 20 Nov 2024 20:44:58 UTC No. 16486943
>>16486684
this added context didn't make it any more intelligent or interesting
🗑️ Anonymous at Wed, 20 Nov 2024 21:58:50 UTC No. 16487047
>>16475964
so brave
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8C_qH
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 14:43:48 UTC No. 16490464
>>16486784
>natural upper body buoyancy
or to use a technical term, booba
🗑️ bodhi at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 17:40:41 UTC No. 16490602
>>16475964
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGE
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:27:00 UTC No. 16490661
>>16477819
IIRC Obama was the first time in over 100 years of publication they felt they must endorse a candidate. The world wars, great depression actual hitler were not as critical to science as the first black president.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:30:29 UTC No. 16490664
>>16490602
sending rosa parks to the back of the bus was based
https://youtu.be/6C-kBVggFrs?t=47
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:32:19 UTC No. 16490667
>>16490661
what did obama end up doing for science?
what great scientific advancements were made as a result of anything obama did?
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:37:10 UTC No. 16490673
>>16485494
>>16485455
atheists have been pushing the intellectual hype since their meme of enlightenment, hence why according to them all the poor should go to college
atheists have no critical thinking so they think if they dont understand something, it means it's deep and true, and they just parrot the dumb down version of the thing over and over (think of Kant and Hegel, ie The german question).
This was all academics before 2012, but in 2012 occupywall street happened and it's the first time that socialists knew they have a better market to tap than the proletariat after the commies killed themselves (and thus leaving socialists standing like morons, since according to socialists, socialism was a bridge from the classical liberal republic by bourgeois to communism).
The market is the young yuppies educated, not in maths, but in Bullshit studies, full of money, and completely fucking lost in life, doing retarded master like psychology, who will end up in a meaningless bureaucratic job and of course those ppl will be mostly roasties. So it's the perfect recipe:
-women have no critical thinking and spend their lives spreading their legs, 10 years of casual sex, then they end up pregnant, so 10 years of raising some kids, then they get bored playing the helicopter mom and they go back to the cock carousel. This makes women desperate to feel virtuous, and they will always embrace what the ruling & entertaining class is telling them (no matter what kind of society they live in)
-the intellectuals in the bourgeois republic want to secure their republic, so the poor who vote really need to think there is an alternative to classical liberalism, and that's jut new liberalism, the 2020 variant is wokeism, but the proletariat is just fucked over since the communists themselves were unmasked as just another society full of control freak atheist bureaucrats who have fuck all idea on what to do, and they heavily despise any criticism
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:38:11 UTC No. 16490676
>>16490673
criticism
-there is also the jewish trend of pushing for self depreciation on whatever atheists consumed, any angle of the way of life after ww2 will be shitted on
-socialists mixed that with the infatuation of the atheists for (fake) introspection
atheists fucking love ''meta'' things, like in their cartoons (atheists love to watch cartoons) so like a cartoon talking directly to the audience knowing he is a cartoon (stuff like rick an morty and so on)
so there you have it, the desperate need of the atheists for public posturing, applying especially to the roasties, and huge control of the ruling class over entertainment (ie Hollywood and the academia).
The fantasy of the atheist is to mix, in their republic, 3 things
-the bureaucracy
-the education
-the entertainment
so for instance when you watch the products of Hollywood you get an education, when you get an education you become a better citizen, and when you vote you push for more education and more of Hollywood. In their minds all those 3 fields are the same
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:39:51 UTC No. 16490678
>>16486784
>1.35 MB JPGThe only endurance race with a large enough sample size to conclude women are better at that particular sport is long distance swimming, where it is thought their natural upper body buoyancy gives them a biological edge. The other sports are too niche to determine if there's a gender difference or individual difference.
It's easy in tennis: if women and men were totally equal, then a female training against purely other females would be just as strong as a man training purely against other men. So for instance the velocity of the ball would be identical for this woman and this man.
It turns out they are not.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:08:53 UTC No. 16490715
>>16485494
Trump isn't a conservative, he's a populist.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:13:05 UTC No. 16490724
National Geographic
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:20:10 UTC No. 16490737
>>16490667
He invented the buck breaker 9000, which increased America's agricultural output significantly by efficiently sodomizing cotton pickers buttholes many times per second for failing to meet quota. This was a major technological breakthrough that revitalized American farmland.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:28:48 UTC No. 16490873
>>16486684
Your context just made it worse.
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 01:59:39 UTC No. 16491135
https://x.com/stillgray/status/1860
BSM comes to the defense of crazy science lady.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 06:53:21 UTC No. 16491365
>>16485455
>The SAME two parties have been running the USA for almost 200 years.
The two party duopoly fell in 2016 after it finally grew too out of touch to survive and collapsed. One party was conquered and rebuilt by Trump and in an alternate universe where Bernie wasn't a total cuck it could've been both. The turmoil of the last 8 years has been the establishment at war trying to reclaim lost territory and the psychological part of this war has driven a big chunk of the country genuinely insane.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 15:50:14 UTC No. 16491639
>>16491365
>tldr maga is the new left.
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:53:53 UTC No. 16493060
>>16491365
Bernie likes Trump these days. The MSM has been trying to cover it up.
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 05:13:14 UTC No. 16493749
Dawkin went on his xitter to say that this cunt is a retard
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 23:30:23 UTC No. 16494640
Listening to Bloomberg. "Let's talk about the murder of this rabbi." Wtf does this have to do with financial market commentary?
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 01:43:12 UTC No. 16495731
>>16491365
There has never been two parties, there has always been one united ZOG that uses the false choice between the two parties as a meme in order to prevent a violent revolt in which they know they have zero chance of survival.
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 17:33:15 UTC No. 16496342
>>16485494
>Why are people so gullible that any lie their media tells them they blindly believe?
Because people are more interested in the idea of X, rather than X.
>the idea of Trump as saviour/Hitler vs real Trump
>the idea of capitalism/communism rather then the real system
>the idea of science rather than actual research
If you want to understand people stop delving into things, and start accepting everything as is. ("as is" meaning of course not as is in reality, but as is presented in media and social networks.)
🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 29 Nov 2024 01:00:02 UTC No. 16496709
>>16491365
>Bernie
he is the ron paul of the left, just a shill that says what they know people want to hear but never does anything meaningful about it even when he has the chance to. bernie intentionally lost he primary campaign when he had a chance to win same as ron paul did in 2012, they let both of them get just close enough so to keep their voters staisifed to stay inside the party while giving them nothing in return.
🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 29 Nov 2024 03:48:04 UTC No. 16496839
>>16475964
>nature
political publication that supported Biden twice
>scientific american
another political publication that supported the communist left and editors have extreme hate for Trump supporters
Are there any legitimate scientific journal left?
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 30 Nov 2024 05:29:54 UTC No. 16497948
>>16496839
>Are there any legitimate scientific journal left?
legitimate science is done outside of academia. nobody is going to publish useful information in a science journal, they will keep the info to themselves so that they can capitalize on it. nobody on this board can name a single journal article published so far this century that had an substantial positive impact on humanity, academics are leeches, the don't serve any useful purpose, they waste public funds and funnel it to their useless publication outlets.
the journals charge enormous fees to their authors, its a vanity publishing industry
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 30 Nov 2024 18:37:08 UTC No. 16498421
>>16497948
>the journals charge enormous fees to their authors, its a vanity publishing industry
They charge those fees to the authors' funding sources, which is the government, so the academic science publishing industry is a government funded propaganda program in which the funds are laundered through academia to try and make it appear as if it's not a government funded propaganda program.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 1 Dec 2024 02:18:39 UTC No. 16498798
>>16491365
Why the fuck is the DNC so God damn opposed to Bernie? The mofo is a mother fucking saint yet they wouldn't touch hit with a 50 ft pole. Him and Ron are the only good politicians left
🗑️ Anonymous at Wed, 4 Dec 2024 02:57:24 UTC No. 16501761
>>16494640
who controls the financial markets?
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 5 Dec 2024 04:56:19 UTC No. 16503238
>>16491365
>The two party duopoly fell in 2016
they combined it into one party (it always was one party btw) and its now trump vs all of them.
and somehow trump seems to be winning.
🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 6 Dec 2024 04:04:44 UTC No. 16504510
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 7 Dec 2024 00:24:35 UTC No. 16505325
>>16498798
The system would rather tolerate a Trump than a Bernie. Take that how you will.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 7 Dec 2024 04:41:59 UTC No. 16505519
>>16485494
>Except this never happened or will ever happen.
unfortunate, we'd all be better off if the fags' persecution complex reflected reality
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 8 Dec 2024 04:57:26 UTC No. 16506411
>>16490676
cartoons are for children, or overgrown babies apparently. that probably explains their enthusiasm for the nanny state too
Anonymous at Sun, 8 Dec 2024 07:53:28 UTC No. 16506493
>>16475964
what if I just call her work gay and leave
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 9 Dec 2024 04:22:26 UTC No. 16507353
>>16496839
>editors have extreme hate for Trump supporters
They actually hate all whites, not only whites who don't cuck for them. The left establishment routinely screws over the white who cuck for them because they know the cucks are too sissified to ever complain.
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 9 Dec 2024 04:26:28 UTC No. 16507355
>>16496839
Those are owned by the same company.
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 10 Dec 2024 03:04:41 UTC No. 16508371
>>16507355
companies aren't just abstract objects that exist on their own, they all have individual owners and administrators.
🗑️ Anonymous at Wed, 11 Dec 2024 03:34:19 UTC No. 16509449
>>16498798
They antisemitic
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 12 Dec 2024 02:12:17 UTC No. 16510308
>>16491639
its not as much of a new phenomenon as you might think, 40 years ago they were reagan democrats, before that they were dixiecrats.
chuds have always been socially conservative and economically antisemitic. fdr had to goad the japs into attacking pearl harbor get them to support ww2 because nobody in america had any objection to the way jews were being treated in germany
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Dec 2024 04:00:56 UTC No. 16511303
>>16475964
In her defense, SciAm has been a trash publication since at least the turn of the century. If you have any significant specialty knowledge of science then you noticed how shitty the publication was when it covered your field. However the overwhelming majority of people do not have such knowledge so most people don't recognize how shit it is, plus a lot of retards will read a terrible and misleading article about their own field and then get the Gell-Mann amnesia effect and presume that articles they lack background info on are accurate.
Anonymous at Sat, 14 Dec 2024 03:54:01 UTC No. 16512313
>>16511303
>Gell-Mann amnesia effect
I independently discovered that while reading Scientific American, it wasn't until years later that I found out Gell-Mann had already placed his name on the concept
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 15 Dec 2024 04:28:45 UTC No. 16513440
>>16512313
>my discovery was stolen by a jew
common occurrence in the sciences
Anonymous at Mon, 16 Dec 2024 03:52:54 UTC No. 16514346
>>16476259
>gutted
its been a trash publication for decades, popsci is always trash, its popularity is explained by the dunning kruger effect
>i watched a 10 minute youtube video, now i understand this field of science as well as people who've been at it professionally for decades
Anonymous at Tue, 17 Dec 2024 05:15:42 UTC No. 16515568
>>16490724
another trash tier publication which also falsely claims to be science oriented
Anonymous at Wed, 18 Dec 2024 01:30:26 UTC No. 16516462
>>16475964
>makes scientists do free work for her
>pay respects
academic editors can fuck off
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Dec 2024 00:06:42 UTC No. 16517527
>>16515568
Name a single good science oriented publication.
protip: you can't
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Dec 2024 00:43:00 UTC No. 16517552
>>16486784
>where it is thought their natural upper body buoyancy gives them a biological edge.
Hot
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Dec 2024 22:24:04 UTC No. 16518441
>>16475964
translation: i've ran it into the ground and destroyed it's reputation and now that there is nothing left to destroy i'll move on elsewhere
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Dec 2024 22:51:35 UTC No. 16518458
>>16516462
Scientific American is not a science journal, it's a popular science magazine.
>>16517527
Physics World
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Dec 2024 04:24:23 UTC No. 16518719
>>16475964
Press S to science.
🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 20 Dec 2024 12:48:51 UTC No. 16519022
>>16485494
>Why are people so gullible that any lie their media tells them they blindly believe?
That's by design. Read
>Manufacturing Consent (Chomsky)
>Propaganda (Bernays)
It's literally meant to design public consent so the elites can unequivocally decide what to do, i.e., start certain wars, oppose Hitler and so on. Key part of this is to keep the general populace dumb, which is why the US school system is ridiculed all over the world, although it had been too notch around the 1900s.
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Dec 2024 04:01:06 UTC No. 16519701
>>16518441
video game journalism should be her next move
Anonymous at Sun, 22 Dec 2024 03:36:11 UTC No. 16520476
>>16519701
I didn't realize she was trans
Anonymous at Sun, 22 Dec 2024 22:34:40 UTC No. 16521260
Anonymous at Sun, 22 Dec 2024 22:36:32 UTC No. 16521264
>>16475964
Scientific Amurican has been a liberal left political shit rag for decades
Anonymous at Sun, 22 Dec 2024 22:41:18 UTC No. 16521270
>>16486784
>>16490464
>>16517552
not "upper body" it's the greater amount of fat
picrel is ultra-long distance champion swimmer
Anonymous at Mon, 23 Dec 2024 15:53:20 UTC No. 16521819
>>16521270
Fat men exist.
Anonymous at Mon, 23 Dec 2024 18:15:02 UTC No. 16521931
>>16521270
>>16521819
Damn, she is like a human version of a manatee. Makes sense I guess.
Anonymous at Thu, 26 Dec 2024 04:23:12 UTC No. 16524075
>>16523203
good magazine lol
Anonymous at Thu, 26 Dec 2024 06:20:20 UTC No. 16524142
>>16486784
I like boob
Sincerely, Anonymous PhD
Anonymous at Thu, 26 Dec 2024 08:16:20 UTC No. 16524183
>>16476592
I work as an IT consultant and I see the workings of many different kinds of companies. By far the biggest and most common issue are incompetent and power-grabbing MBAs.
Anonymous at Fri, 27 Dec 2024 05:38:35 UTC No. 16524898
>>16524183
wrong, the biggest problem is minorities and women
Anonymous at Sat, 28 Dec 2024 20:46:45 UTC No. 16526596
Anonymous at Mon, 30 Dec 2024 15:53:15 UTC No. 16529909
>>16526596
There is a large body of evidence proving that Europeans were the original settlers of the Americas, its not just the genetic evidence that shows it.
Anonymous at Wed, 1 Jan 2025 03:27:56 UTC No. 16531471
>>16518458
>Physics World
soislop
Anonymous at Thu, 2 Jan 2025 16:55:26 UTC No. 16532723
>>16476621
>Her vomit reflex has saved me thousands of dollars a year.
what is this supposed to mean, is this sexual?
Anonymous at Fri, 3 Jan 2025 19:46:52 UTC No. 16534254
>>16521264
all mainstream 'science' publications are like this, just thinly disguised political propaganda
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 18:34:07 UTC No. 16535270
>>16534254
Why is it that all of the mainstream publications that are "just thinly disguised political propaganda" are all propagandizing one set of views and one political agenda?
If we lived in a truly free society wouldn't all sets of views and agendas have their own propaganda outlets?
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 03:59:48 UTC No. 16536882
>>16535270
stop being so antisemitic
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 12:16:21 UTC No. 16537156
>>16535270
It's a combination of several things. Because so much of science is reliant on government funding, "science" wants big government. There's also the quirk of religious people being more conservative than non-religious people while science is somewhat anti-religion, at least currently. Then you have that journalists for whatever reason tend to have lots of mental and substance abuse problems, both of which are more closely related to leftist ideology than to conservationism.
🗑️ Anonymous at Wed, 8 Jan 2025 04:55:42 UTC No. 16538871
>>16536882
TSMT
>>16535270
Plz stop noticing
Anonymous at Wed, 8 Jan 2025 18:06:04 UTC No. 16539349
>>16535270
All dying media goes left, all left media dies.
Bad propaganda pushes out good readers.
What percentage of American scientists read scientific American magazine in the 60s... maybe 50%? Maybe more? Now look at the nu-left SciAm subscriber numbers as a percentage of scientists, or a percentage of Americans.
0.00609% of the worlds population reads that shitty dying magazine... The other 99.9939% of the planets population won't even pick up a copy to line a birdcage or wrap fish; it is a dying media, how could it not be ultra leftist?
Anonymous at Fri, 10 Jan 2025 03:53:02 UTC No. 16541011
>>16539349
it would be more popular if it was printed on toilet paper