Image not available

1280x720

IMG_8908.jpg

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ ๐Ÿงต Is he right?

Anonymous No. 16477033

Why has no one proved him wrong yet?

Anonymous No. 16477165

>>16477033
He was thoroughly refuted by Neil Degrass Tyson, but then started to seethe like a pseud.

Anonymous No. 16477180

>>16477165
Neil be acting the Uncle Tom.

Raphael No. 16477190

>>16477165
ROFL

Raphael No. 16477193

>>16477033
His Iq is prob 115 he thinks he has some negro logic that will make the black community proud

Anonymous No. 16477199

>>16477193
Try 95, he couldnt even graduate from his chem engineering program

Anonymous No. 16477241

>>16477033
Plenty of people have refuted his presuppositions, which results in an undermining of his assertions. He makes quite a few false presuppositions and then elaborates upon the falsities. Howard's utility lies within the understanding that a system retains its strength through a process of attack and defense. Howard is a mindless attack dog that strikes most thoroughly at the weak points of the system. The system's response SHOULD be to reinforce those weak points, but the corruption within the system may be too much to overcome. Can the system teach retards why 1x1=1? Hopefully so, otherwise we have a problem. The only thing that has every been able to address and remedy the problems within the system is the system itself, and if that ceases to be a viable avenue of response then we should be very concerned.

Anonymous No. 16477254

>>16477241
Nevermind the system. We just need to start bullying schizos publicly.