Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:22:22 UTC No. 16477156

>>16477095
>yeah, anon, I’m working with chaotic systems that are sensitive to initial conditions
>unfortunately, numerical methods have exponentially decreasing accuracy as the simulation progresses, so we have to rely on more sophisticated methods involving analysis, topology and group theory
>OOGA BOOGA you no use computer you use made up shaman magic science is a scam
Do not redeem research saar! AI will replace you saaar, buy ChatGPT stock you bloody!

Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:38:09 UTC No. 16477206

>>16477156
If it converges to some more predictable behavior then it's equivalent to running simulation many times with different initial conditions and averaging the results.
If you can't simulate it, you're bullshitting your way to the correct result with obfuscating math and explanations.
Simple as.

Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:39:13 UTC No. 16477210

>>16477095
>If you're unable to simulate your model fully on a computer and all you have are hand-wavy explanations with few mathematical equations scattered around then you're no better than a tribal shaman using a few legit physical phenomenons in his magical performances trying to impress his ignorant audiences.
Sure, and your point is?

Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 00:40:47 UTC No. 16477213

>>16477210
Theoretical physicists are pretending to know more than they actually do for clout.

Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 06:14:42 UTC No. 16477541

>>16477213
When? Give me a single example

Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 11:18:18 UTC No. 16477690

>>16477206
You should google what a floating point error is.

Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 12:02:18 UTC No. 16477713

>>16477095
> Infinitely larger set of non-computable functions than computable functions
you're actually retarded if you think computers are the solution to everything