ποΈ π§΅ Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:54:06 UTC No. 16477520
Are millimeter wave scanners harmful to humans?
Last thread was deleted for no reason.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:57:39 UTC No. 16477524
nah
even if they are, they use the same frequencies that cell phones use but like 1/1000 the power, so they are the least of your worries
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 07:26:30 UTC No. 16477568
Yes. Touch is important. The TSA could have prevented my developmental disability by touching me instead.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 07:28:05 UTC No. 16477571
>>16477568
you can always asked to be touched, anon
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 10:37:14 UTC No. 16477660
>>16477524
100% safe.
ποΈ Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 12:34:03 UTC No. 16477725
>>16477660
You are a retard fuck off to >>>/x/
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 12:37:19 UTC No. 16477727
>>16477660
If you are not satisfied then you can always fuck off to >>>/x/. Your schizo friends there have better knowledge about millimeter waves.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 12:49:15 UTC No. 16477734
>>16477520
Why are these retards so afraid of radio waves but not visible light? Visible light has a much higher frequency and compared to the device in picrel, the light sources usually have a higher power density.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 12:50:36 UTC No. 16477735
>>16477734
>>16477727
Whoa, take your seroquel psychos, your uncontrollable emotions are showing.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 13:30:47 UTC No. 16477763
>>16477734
You ever notice how light doesn't pass through your whole body?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 13:54:16 UTC No. 16477775
>>16477660
Cool, a certain time and date perhaps?
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 14:01:44 UTC No. 16477789
>>16477734
Because /x/fags tend to attribute supernatural qualities to anything they canβt see.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 14:13:11 UTC No. 16477806
>>16477763
But it does somewhat penetrate
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 14:31:46 UTC No. 16477816
>>16477763
Millimeter-waves don't penetrate that deeply either. It's the microwaves and below that penetrate deep into the skin. But all of these are non-ionizing at the photon level. So the problem is with high-power radio waves that can heat up your tissues. But this device radiates 1 mW for a few milliseconds. Even weaker than your modem at home, which is constantly on.
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 14:59:09 UTC No. 16477835
>>16477520
probably
>>16477524
you mean the same frequencies as a microwave oven. Ever wonder why your face gets warm when you hold the cellphone up to it? I'll give you a hint, it's not the battery :^)
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 18:11:13 UTC No. 16478010
>>16477806
>But it does somewhat penetrate
the skin depth (how far field penetrates matter more or less) of human skin at 2.4GHz is like 1 um.
at higher frequencies the skin depth is even less.
>you mean the same frequencies as a microwave oven
the microwave is operating at like 1000W.
your cellphone is operating at like 1 W.
wi-fi is operating at like 0.1 W.
and those scanners? something like 0.001 W.
if i'm willing to go outside in 2024, i'm willing to walk through a millimeter wave scanner (and have done so many times because i've collaborated on research building these things)
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 19:12:16 UTC No. 16478066
>>16477571
The damage has already been done.