Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 23:41:02 UTC No. 16478355

>>16478324
Measure changes in conceptual space mappings. Did this for a certain government agency in the 1990s.
Multi-Dimensional Scaling, Principle Components Analysis, and Correspondence Analysis.

Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:45:06 UTC No. 16479793

>>16478324

Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:55:17 UTC No. 16479810

>>16479793
>scientific american

Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 21:58:47 UTC No. 16479813

>>16479810
>Reads stuff
>Too dumb to know what an OpEd is
The proliferation of literacy was a mistake.

Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:06:58 UTC No. 16479819

>>16479813
OP asked about research, not OpEds.

Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 22:23:04 UTC No. 16479837

>>16479819
OP has on-topic responses.
He clearly is uninterested in discussion.

Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 01:58:35 UTC No. 16480096

>>16478324
in terms of researching the effectiveness of political propaganda on /sci/ you could find a political propaganda campaign that was run on the board using the archives and then use the archives to get an impression of attitudes on the topic before and after the campaign was run

Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 02:40:40 UTC No. 16480127

>>16479813
opeds have to be approved by the editors of the journal. they won't publish an oped about a nazi manifesto, for example. in other words, the approval by the editors means, despite what the disclaimers say, that the opinions within are reflective of what the journal is okay with sharing.

Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 03:58:39 UTC No. 16480188

>>16480096
>impression of attitudes
Got anything a bit less qualitative?
Say like >>16478355?

Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 03:59:59 UTC No. 16480190

>>16480127
Yeah, we get it. You cannot stay on-topic.

Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 03:08:44 UTC No. 16481646

>>16480188
develop a means of quantifying it