Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 14:41:41 UTC No. 16478990

>>16478636
It only bans classical information velocities. Quantum shenanigans are a different story.

Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 15:39:51 UTC No. 16479032

>>16478990
That's not what I'm asking.

If all motion is relative then an earth centric model of the universe is merely choosing a space time moving with the earth and writing the equations from there. Except we can't to that because then stars would be breaking the speed limit.

Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:10:20 UTC No. 16479051

>>16479032
>Except we can't to that because then stars would be breaking the speed limit.
how?=

Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 16:26:20 UTC No. 16479063

>>16479051
Just some quick napkin math so it's probably wrong, but if the earth were stationary in a given space time anything over 500AU away would be rotating faster than c.

Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 17:59:05 UTC No. 16479461

>>16479063
GR talks about inertial reference frames... i.e. not rotating

Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 05:53:27 UTC No. 16480239

>>16479032
Well, that's why I said it's about information. You only measure the velocity of things by the photons they emit. You will never receive photons from something that is at the speed limit, at which point it doesn't exist from your frame anymore.
Presumably there are things like that outside of the visible universe but we can't have that info.

DoctorGreen !DRgReeNusk at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 11:07:40 UTC No. 16480453

>>16480239
>You only measure the velocity of things by the photons they emit
that's gay and retarded