Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:33:14 UTC No. 16481775

>>16481774
Temu babies when

Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:46:35 UTC No. 16481781

>will be
sure man. sure.

Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 06:45:05 UTC No. 16481811

Perfect korean wives

Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 06:53:59 UTC No. 16481820

>>16481774
If it means I make babies normaly, and then they inject CRISPR or simillar stuff into mom, I'm starting to save up.

Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 15:57:06 UTC No. 16482444

>>16481820
>thinking this will be avalible to the non 1% in america

Anonymous at Wed, 20 Nov 2024 18:35:50 UTC No. 16486697

>>16481774
Good. The Chinese will look like Chads with genius IQ levels in a few decades, while the west fill be filled with ugly as sin retards.

Anonymous at Wed, 20 Nov 2024 18:42:51 UTC No. 16486708

>>16481774
Mark my words, gene-editing will ne the next superconductor. Nothing will ever happen

Anonymous at Wed, 20 Nov 2024 18:48:24 UTC No. 16486722

>>16486708
Jews already do the second best thing after gene editing, they do it at mass scale to avoid married couples that can have children with genetic diseases due recessive genes.

It will be big, first to prevent well known negative conditions, and then to boost positive traits.

Anonymous at Wed, 20 Nov 2024 19:00:41 UTC No. 16486744

>>16486722
>It will be big
That’s what they said about superconductors

Anonymous at Wed, 20 Nov 2024 19:17:22 UTC No. 16486770

>>16481774
>you can't make improve you children mental and physical abilities!
>why?
>you just can't, ok?

Anonymous at Wed, 20 Nov 2024 20:24:52 UTC No. 16486903

>>16481774
>immune to HIV/AIDS
Just don't be a fag/slut
I don't want doctors poking around my big gay baby

Anonymous at Wed, 20 Nov 2024 20:27:15 UTC No. 16486911

>>16481774
>a decade ago
another decade until I can edit myself?

Anonymous at Wed, 20 Nov 2024 20:36:32 UTC No. 16486934

>>16481774
Genetically engineered babies are a meme, like Fusion or Nuclear War - it'll never happen. I've seen the media hype about it since the early 2000s. The significance of the human genome is pretty overrated in public, humans only have about 25,000 protein-coding genes, wheat and the common carp have 30,000 to 40,000 in comparison.
>making them immune to HIV/AIDS
Why the fuck do we even still talk about HIV? It's a meme disease that is impossible to catch as long as you don't inject yourself with used needles, or let a man ejaculate inside your ass. Even then, through anal sex the risk is approximately 1 in 70 (or 1.4%) each time that you can get it from someone who is infected. Injecting yourself with a used needle and it's about 0.67% (or 1 in 150).

Anonymous at Wed, 20 Nov 2024 20:41:15 UTC No. 16486939

>>16486770
>123. If you think that big government interferes in your life too much NOW, just wait till the government starts regulating the genetic constitution of your children. Such regulation will inevitably follow the introduction of genetic engineering of human beings, because the consequences of unregulated genetic engineering would be disastrous. [19]

>124. The usual response to such concerns is to talk about “medical ethics.” But a code of ethics would not serve to protect freedom in the face of medical progress; it would only make matters worse. A code of ethics applicable to genetic engineering would be in effect a means of regulating the genetic constitution of human beings. Somebody (probably the upper-middle class, mostly) would decide that such and such applications of genetic engineering were “ethical” and others were not, so that in effect they would be imposing their own values on the genetic constitution of the population at large. Even if a code of ethics were chosen on a completely democratic basis, the majority would be imposing their own values on any minorities who might have a different idea of what constituted an “ethical” use of genetic engineering. The only code of ethics that would truly protect freedom would be one that prohibited ANY genetic engineering of human beings, and you can be sure that no such code will ever be applied in a technological society. No code that reduced genetic engineering to a minor role could stand up for long, because the temptation presented by the immense power of biotechnology would be irresistible, especially since to the majority of people many of its applications will seem obviously and unequivocally good (eliminating physical and mental diseases, giving people the abilities they need to get along in today’s world). Inevitably, genetic engineering will be used extensively, but only in ways consistent with the needs of the industrial- technological system. [20]

Anonymous at Thu, 21 Nov 2024 00:05:30 UTC No. 16487220

>>16486934
>>16486708
It literally happened in 2018.

Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 05:20:56 UTC No. 16488851

>>16487220
Yes.

Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 06:01:10 UTC No. 16488866

>>16487220
I am dubious as to the validity of that
but if it is true I fully endorse killing the kids and the mother

Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:24:10 UTC No. 16490864

>>16481774
They will probably become 'pre-vaccined' when the government gets their hands into it and forces regulation.

Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:32:33 UTC No. 16490883

I think it's far more complex than this implies. We dont even know what most genes do, only what they're associated with. I've even heard that one gene may may seem to express a trait in one group of people may not have that effevt in another. In other words, a "tall gene" for people in wales will not necessarily work for people in Rwanda. There are many complicated interaction at play.

Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:52:58 UTC No. 16491255

>>16488866
Slaw

Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 15:18:36 UTC No. 16492856

>>16491255
Finna?

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 10:43:19 UTC No. 16493916

>>16492856
If You're a financial consolidation evil, and not an Ethical Generative Good...

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 10:44:48 UTC No. 16493917

>>16493916
S'law

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 09:43:32 UTC No. 16496035

>>16481774
In a century we will see pre-natal genetic modification as we see today vaccinations. Would I like for my child not to worry about genetic diseases, heart conditions, alzheimer, cancer and other unborn diseases? Yes. If I can help my child health, fitness and resilience, I will. We put children in school not just to amass knowledge and memories but improve their thinking. Pregnant women don't drink alcohol, eat healthy and don't smoke so thay their children are born healthier and smarter. The intend is the same, but with genetic modifications we can ensure that a child is born with more abilities and potential to achieve its goals. And when the cost are a few thousand dollars every child could.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 10:00:19 UTC No. 16496042

>>16481774
If this ever goes mainstream, it's going t cause a genetic cataclysm and seriously endanger the entire species.
The first one or two generations will be fine, then you'll start to see more and more frequent cases of generic defects, getting more common and extreme with each generation.
Widespread infertility, deformities, and illness will be the least of your worries. You'll see a huge increase in dementia, schizophrenia, and antisocial disorders, to the point that society is going to break the fuck down.

I'm warning you like I warn everyone.
Do not fuck with genetics.
It will fuck us all up.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 10:57:29 UTC No. 16496076

ya ya ya wake me up when they figure out how to edit either post natal genes or when they figure out how to change skin color

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 11:16:06 UTC No. 16496084

>>16496042
Why and how should these genetic defects arise.
Why didn't this happen to animals nd crops that we genetically engineer since more than 30 years. That are more than 5 generations.
Reality proofs you wrong.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 11:18:14 UTC No. 16496086

>>16496076
>how to edit either post natal genes
They did that with sickle cells.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 12:28:53 UTC No. 16496114

>>16481774
>genetically engineer babies to be taller, stronger, faster
>babies turn out black

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 19:40:03 UTC No. 16496470

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Nov 2024 17:14:04 UTC No. 16497324

df

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Nov 2024 18:08:42 UTC No. 16497371

>>16486708
Because of government regulations. Not because the technology is flawed.

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Nov 2024 18:10:04 UTC No. 16497373

>>16486722
>boost positive traits.
Too many leftists in the field for that. They want it regulated because they hate the idea of eugenics. Shame we live in a dysgenic society that needs eugenics to stave off collapse.

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Nov 2024 18:16:02 UTC No. 16497380

>>16486934
>Genetically engineered babies are a meme, like Fusion
Human innovation won’t stop in the grand scale. Government regulations set it back or slow it, but eventually civilisations collapse and renew.
> Why the fuck do we even still talk about HIV?
Evolution exists. Selection pressure against HIV viruses susceptible to current therapies, so you should expect to see viruses resistant to them. Same with antibiotics.

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Nov 2024 18:23:33 UTC No. 16497388

>>16486770
Leftists really struggle with the difference between doing something and not doing something.
E.g they equate not giving a starving man food to stabbing a man to death.
E.g they equate genetically enhancing your child to poisoning their child.

Letting people are dysgenic subhumans.

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Nov 2024 18:25:51 UTC No. 16497389

>>16486939
>medical ethics
Made up bureaucratic HR welfare nonsense. Have you read the Nuremberg code, it’s appallingly worded.

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Nov 2024 18:26:52 UTC No. 16497390

>>16488866
>NNNOOOOO WE MUST ONLY HAVE DYSGENICS!!!
Subhuman.

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Nov 2024 18:28:16 UTC No. 16497392

>>16496035
Would be nice. But I think regulations will get too much. Also I thing dysgenic breeding has been permitted too long - civilization will degrade too much by then. Watch Edward Dutton.

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Nov 2024 18:31:06 UTC No. 16497393

>>16496042
You’re a retard. Natural selection acts on a free market as well as a species.
Why would people buy faulty genetic treatments? They won’t. Instead they’ll buy treatments that work from competitions. Thus there is a selection pressure for companies to produce functional therapies.

Try using that minute brain of yours.

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Nov 2024 18:32:56 UTC No. 16497394

>>16496042
> It will fuck us all up.
What do you think allowing the dumbest in the population to have the highest fertility is doing? You’re blind and stupid.

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Nov 2024 18:34:04 UTC No. 16497398

>>16496084
He believes in stories like “the machine stops” or Star Trek’s Kahn.

Anonymous at Sat, 30 Nov 2024 18:29:46 UTC No. 16498407

>>16496042
>I'm warning you like I warn everyone.
Like without a shred of evidence?

Anonymous at Sun, 1 Dec 2024 02:23:11 UTC No. 16498801

>>16497373
The silly part is how partner selecting works these days, only certain individuals are reproducing (lookism and retards with no foresight) we are getting taller and dumber in because of it.

Anonymous at Mon, 2 Dec 2024 08:31:28 UTC No. 16500023

>>16481781
It happened 6 years ago. Offically.

Anonymous at Mon, 2 Dec 2024 14:31:11 UTC No. 16500193

>>16498801
Ask me how I know that you're short and insecure about it

Anonymous at Mon, 2 Dec 2024 15:07:54 UTC No. 16500216

>>16486934
>HIV is a meme disease that is impossible to catch
Is that what you tell yourself so you can justify having unprotected sex with prostitutes and various strangers? Come on anon, you can be honest here.

Anonymous at Mon, 2 Dec 2024 15:13:53 UTC No. 16500222

>>16496035
>Pregnant women don't drink alcohol, eat healthy and don't smoke
>eat healthy
No pregnant woman eats healthy. What planet are living you on? They justify eating heaps of fattening food to themselves and others because they are pregnant.

Anonymous at Wed, 4 Dec 2024 07:17:35 UTC No. 16501900

>>16496086
>They did that with sickle
Wasn't there some political movement that had iconography that was associated with "axe and sickle", err no, I mean "saw and sickle"?

Anonymous at Wed, 4 Dec 2024 07:33:14 UTC No. 16501902

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdRdbP4wQAo

Waifu time