Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 06:35:04 UTC No. 16488882

>>16488869
>I mean, so would it be correct for men and women to get married at the same age to avoid problems with the unborn child? what do you think?
this presupposes that girls and boys are equal


Women are kids with boobs and vagenes.
Women peak intellectually at age 15. It is when they discover first hand that no matter how bland or even evil they are, thousands of men will be eager to compete for them, fix their daily problems and give them an easy life free of charge.

The conclusion is that a society is always matriarchal and never patriarchal. This is because in any society, 99% of men are disposable cucks happy to compete for women. In any society women control men. Now as said, the girl peaks physically and intellectually at age 15, but boys peak physically and intellectually much later at age 30. Boys mature more slowly because they go much further in the intellectual development. Which gives the ideal age for marriage 15 for girls, 30 for men.

Now you talk about marriage but you also have to understand that the atheist marriage is a bastardization of the theist marriage
atheist marriage= the public servants say you are bound to another person defining a household and they give you tax cuts out of it

atheist marriage only makes sens if you take the democratic republic seriously, ie the bourgeois revolutionists public servants.

And the fact that they allow divorce without cause shows how much of a joke their marriage is.
The atheist marriage is just the hedonistic version of the theist one, people get married because they feel like it, then they get divorced because at least one of the person feels like it. There that's the atheist marriage for you.

The atheist marriage is nihilistic, like anything created by the atheists.

Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 06:58:00 UTC No. 16488900

>>16488869
>paternal age
It says nothing about men and women having healthier offspring at similar ages.

Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 07:16:22 UTC No. 16488922

>>16488869
>associated
aaaand into the trash it goes

Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 13:19:24 UTC No. 16489099

>>16488882
What is your point

Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 13:35:32 UTC No. 16489117

>>16488869
I wonder how much of these associations are driven by the fact ugly, deformed, and retarded men have hard time finding a mate, and so they end up having children later. Also, how severe defects are we talking about, and how common are they at optimal ages?

I think it's obvious that people should have children young in any case. The first ones as teenagers, most likely. However, it's also obvious that for women this is more important than for men, since outright infertility starts sharply rising for them as early as at the age of 30.

Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 13:43:54 UTC No. 16489124

>>16489117
>ugly men
Wft?

Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:21:36 UTC No. 16490655

huh

Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 18:36:48 UTC No. 16490672

>>16488869
Woman 18-22y
Man 38-42

Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 10:35:25 UTC No. 16491475

>>16488882
Women are children, they're perpetual teenagers, like kids but with cunning and a sex drive. In other words, awful. They're mortality is humean, whereas males are kantians. Humean morality is indefensible and is why so many women do terrible things to themselves ans others, because it felt OK in the moment, so it was OK.
I genuinely believe we won't survive for much longer as a species unless we fix female deficits with selective eugenic breeding to weed out the insanity within them.

women definitely possess less moral faculty then men, thanks to their regrettable inheritance of psychological emotionalism. Men through milliena have worked hard to create a bubble of unreality where women could live, a place of complete safety from the hostile world, but women have been luxuriously insulated from the perils of the real world for so long their instincts have drifted without the correcting hand of mother nature, and thus we have unintentionally bred women who are delusional and fundamentally unstable. Women are sadly closer to the beasts then men are. I hope one day corrective eugenic breeding will improve the faculties of man and who sorely need it the most, women. I have dreams that we're all one day akin to the elves from the LOTR, beautiful, impeccably moral, wise and thriving with ease.

Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 12:12:10 UTC No. 16491518

>>16488882
ok pedo

Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 19:31:29 UTC No. 16491841

>>16488869

You should be married and having kids at 16.

Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 23:37:30 UTC No. 16492093

>>16488882
>this presupposes that girls and boys are equal
Greater demand is placed on boys and men than on females therefore not equal on that basis alone. Women expect men to do things for them but they should not expect because that expectation never existed in a vacuum. Women should not expect anything if they don't' have and carry out corresponding duties. The problem is men have been giving support to women without the women doing anything constructive in return...and worse men giving support to women who are outright destructive.

Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 23:39:03 UTC No. 16492097

>>16491841
>You should be married and having kids at 16.
If you're a 16 y/o female. A man has more responsibility and unless he is sponsored and supported by other men its probably best in the modern Western economics for him to wait until he is in his 20s to start a family.

Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 23:42:58 UTC No. 16492101

>>16491518
There was no mention of anyone under the age of 12. How can anything he typed be 'pedo'?

Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:50:02 UTC No. 16492663

>>16488869
The truth is that this is exponentially worse for women. Issues with the starter seed vs anything wrong with the egg and the oven

Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 12:00:58 UTC No. 16492694

Notice how atheists and women go on a hysterical seething spree as soon as ''teen pregnancy'' is mentioned.

This means teen pregnancy is a good thing. A girl has better chance of survival from pregnancy at age 15 than at age 3 , let alone 45 or something.
And the sooner the pregnancy, the better her body is under control, especially the menstruation.

Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:34:56 UTC No. 16493032

>chink study
into the trash it goes

Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 18:20:34 UTC No. 16493091

>>16492694
>Notice how atheists and women go on a hysterical seething spree as soon as ''teen pregnancy'' is mentioned.
Because they worship the things they consume and pleasurable experiences. Teen pregnancy is viewed as interfering with lifelong worship at the Altar of Coom and Consoom ..its a boogeyman in their religion.

Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:14:23 UTC No. 16493376

>>16492694
If you control for substance abuse, teenage pregnancy is not only safer than those extremes, but it's pretty much the safest option of them all.