Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 11:55:11 UTC No. 16489032

>>16489031
>If intelligence was genetic
*were

Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 12:03:24 UTC No. 16489037

>>16489032
It's was spastic.

Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 12:03:41 UTC No. 16489038

>>16489031
Maybe intelligence isn't genetic but to really improve it you would need a lot of will power to make your brain go through the unnatural intellectual struggle everyday for many hours. And for me it doesn't seems like you can really improve your will power when you have a low will power to begin with because you lack will power to improve your will power.

Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 12:24:29 UTC No. 16489057

>>16489038
Fag. Improving information transfer and receipt (intelligence) is easier than that, you just try to learn more.

Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 14:03:47 UTC No. 16489141

>>16489031
>there may be a baby who is more intelligent than our oldest and wisest
Well, yeah? There are genius kids that can speak several languages fluently, you think a downie can compensate for that by living longer?

Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 14:26:02 UTC No. 16489157

>>16489141
Who gives a shit. Language is a privilege, it's not much intelligence to speak multiple languages.

Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 14:31:22 UTC No. 16489165

>>16489031
Except. Aliens. Don't. Care. They. Are. Only. As. Conscience. As. Us. And. Far. Superior. Technologically.

Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 14:45:12 UTC No. 16489183

>>16489165
Poof 1
>>16489141
Poof 2
>>16489038
Poof 3

Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 19:47:51 UTC No. 16489524

>>16489031
>If intelligence was genetic, there may be a baby who is more intelligent than our oldest and wisest
debunk1:
If it weren't for genetics, you would have the same intelligence as an ape because you wouldn't have a characteristic gene that distinguishes the human brain from that of other mammals.

Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 20:10:13 UTC No. 16489549

>>16489031
>If height were genetic then a baby would grow without food anyway.
Retard.

Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 21:18:40 UTC No. 16489657

>>16489031
>If height was genetic, there may be a baby who is taller than our oldest and tallest. Obviously it's not genetic

Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 17:30:28 UTC No. 16490588

>>16489031
Raise a dog as a human baby, then demonstrate it's human-level intelligence to prove intelligence is not genetic.

raphael at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 03:41:28 UTC No. 16491240

>>16489032
this tells anons iq prob 110

Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 05:13:01 UTC No. 16491318

>>16489031
>If belonging to a species was genetic, babies would emerge from the womb already looking like fully-grown and mature adults, but they don't, therefore it isn't.
(I'm just showing you how utterly retarded your "argument" is.)