Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 13:49:31 UTC No. 16489128

>>16489120
No, but metric time, along with everything else metric, would be great after switching to base twelve. Base ten is a terrible choice but we're stuck with it. As a cope, we can use base twelve in certain applications like time keeping.

Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 14:38:02 UTC No. 16489170

>>16489120
100 seconds in a minute, 100 minutes in an hour, and 10 hours in a day

leads to 100,000 seconds in a day, close to the current 86,400

Either change the definition of a second by ~15%, or lift huge amounts of material to slow the rotation of the earth by around 15%

I prefer the "slow the rotation of the earth" option, but either will be fine

Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 14:45:41 UTC No. 16489185

No matter what system you come up with, you're still stuck with the number of days in a year being ~365.242.
>>16489170
> "slow the rotation of the earth"
OK, this madman does have a solution to the days in a year problem but the implementation details are going to be a bit annoying.

Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 14:46:17 UTC No. 16489187

>>16489170
Do you look like this by any chance?

Anonymous at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 17:03:23 UTC No. 16489347

>>16489120
Oh yes, lets go!
>10 months in a year
>10 weeks in a month
>10 days in a week
>10 hours in a day
>10 minutes in an hour
>10 seconds in a minute
>