🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 03:43:20 UTC No. 16490152
Wasn't global warming supposed to wipe out the polar bears?
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 04:42:44 UTC No. 16490181
>>16490152
I'm still waiting for the three to five feet of sea level rise this century James Hansen promised in the 80s. Last I checked it was millimeters per decade and mostly natural. But I guess theres some *extra millimeters*.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 05:00:21 UTC No. 16490189
>>16490181
dark millimeters
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 05:04:11 UTC No. 16490191
>>16490152
>Wasn't global warming supposed to wipe out the polar bears?
They're still on that projection. That population increase is only local.
Polar Bear numbers across the world have continued to decline - the population in your article is only true for the Southern Hudson Bay bears which have experienced 10 additional days of thick ice, whereas other populations across Canada have experienced 3-4 weeks less of thick ice.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 05:39:00 UTC No. 16490221
>>16490191
>Polar Bear numbers across the world have continued to decline
No they haven't, they're up over 300% during the last 50 years.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 05:42:53 UTC No. 16490223
>>16490221
prove it
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 06:39:09 UTC No. 16490234
>>16490191
https://www.gzeromedia.com
>TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP
Yeah this seems credible.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 06:56:54 UTC No. 16490242
>>16490223
Not the guy your talking to but this article claims a tripling of the population over 50 years, but it credits a hunting ban for the increase.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 06:57:57 UTC No. 16490243
>>16490242
Forgot link
https://www.thegwpf.org/publication
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 08:50:38 UTC No. 16490275
>>16490242
>>16490243
NTA but the population trend isn’t known because they’re not an easy species to track population stats of. It’s not totally accurate to say they’re continually declining, but an increase of only 20,000 after a 50 year hunting ban is pretty bad recovery. In comparison humpback whales were only at around 5,000 in the 60s, and have since jumped to 130,000+ despite having way longer generation times. It’s possible they recovered more since the hunting ban and then started declining more recently with habitat loss, we can’t say
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 09:40:30 UTC No. 16490284
>>16490243
>posting a blog from a lobbying group
oh nononono....
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 10:14:00 UTC No. 16490309
>>16490152
The paris agreements saved them, now the US is backing out and they will die again
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 10:24:00 UTC No. 16490313
>>16490152
Polar bears are antisemitic
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 10:25:00 UTC No. 16490314
>>16490189
Kek
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 15:48:36 UTC No. 16490518
>>16490275
>there should be as many polar bears as there are whales because... uh... there just should be okay!!!
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 20:14:25 UTC No. 16490805
>things you can measure arent happening
>its not happening as fast as that one reporter once wrote to sell more clicks
/pol/ thread.
Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 22:10:15 UTC No. 16490921
>>16490518
Anon you may be retarded
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 01:19:18 UTC No. 16491102
>when I lock myself at home, cover my ears, close my eyes and scream really loudly, then I still can pretend nothing is happening
https://oeco.org.br/wp-content/uplo
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 02:10:39 UTC No. 16491149
>>16491097
More like
>we don’t know whether it’s rising or declining, but we do know the recovery has been poor so we should take the steps to ensure we don’t undo the recovery efforts we’ve already done
Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 02:25:14 UTC No. 16491163
When did you realize that "we don't know" is the only valid scientific answer to questions