Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 12:11:21 UTC No. 16490362

>>16490361
Why are you pushing the transhumanist' agenda?

Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 13:42:42 UTC No. 16490422

>>16490361
That's just conflating semantics. Woman =/= Female. Genders =/= sexes. Hermaphrodites are of both sexes. They can have both or partial genitalia. That's not even getting into Chimerism. Like, are you masturbating or are you jerking off the twin you assimilated in the womb?

I think there's more nuance to sexual identity as well. It's like with animal taxonomy. It's not all physical. The biggest difference between coyotes and wolves is their hunting and social behavior.

On top of that, gay men don't need to have sex to be gay. Sex isn't a qualifier. Needless to say, virgins aren't sexualy active but form an identity regardless.

Here's the thing with collective nouns. They exist by virtue of plurality. You're not male because you have a penis. You are male because there are other humans - other lifeforms, really - that also have a penis. The group has to exist for you to be included in it, right?

Besides, with cloning technology it's only a matter of time before these organs become vestigial. Then the only thing distinguishing men and women would behavior differences.
OR! You never know; penises could evolve additional functions and become wifi "hotspot" antennas so the terms "gay" or "straight" takes on a completely different meaning depending on they willingly service and who even has the capacity to utilizes them.

Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 17:02:34 UTC No. 16490568

>>16490422
>"The world according to me"
Ok chief.

Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:58:59 UTC No. 16490789

>>16490422
Hi tranny. Are you still unable to understand the difference between a male XY and a female XX, even if she has a genetically modified penis?

Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:29:56 UTC No. 16490876

>>16490789
The understanding is that sex chromosomes are instructional blueprints that express themselves at different stages of development. It's entirely possible for the Y chromosome to remain dormant in a person their entire life. And that person would undoubtedly be identified as a woman.
Because gender is a social construct. They are women because people treat them as women.

There's a condition known as güevedoces (lit: testicals at 12) where a person is perceived to be a girl until puberty. They have Y chromosomes, they even have what are called "testicals", but they're internal. Classification and categorization is subject to change. Just like how Pluto was demoted to "Dwarf Planet"; these "testicals" and their function could be reevaluated and renamed.
Humans have lots of vestigial organs. Men have nipples. Some men even lactate. Science might find it prudent to reclassify them because of this trait. But science isn't society and genetic female, legal female, archetypal female, and femininity as an artistic form are all completely different concepts that might be difficult to grasp for people with associative vocabularies.

Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 21:58:52 UTC No. 16490912

>>16490876
I'm talking about GMO human clones, retarded freak. Stop spamming my thread with delusional bullshit.

Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 22:47:51 UTC No. 16490944

>>16490912
No, you're not. No, it isn't.
You might be a Reddit Moderator that's accustomed fabricating community discourse. But this is 4chan.

The questions in the OP are clearly about linguistics and terminology. And that's exactly what everyone in this thread is talking about. Which now includes your dumb ass "naming" a subject you haven't contributed shit too.

Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 22:49:11 UTC No. 16490945

>>16490361
Suffer Not the Tranny to Live

Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:06:00 UTC No. 16490965

>>16490361
It's impossible because they would lack the "femaleness" that a true female has.

Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:12:07 UTC No. 16490972

>>16490965
They are real females, but with a penis. What exactly don't you understand? Do you understand they can do anything with GMO clones?

Anonymous at Sat, 23 Nov 2024 23:13:13 UTC No. 16490974

>>16490972
You've simply restated your position without contending with my post.
That is not an argument, therefore, I am claiming victory and exiting the thread now.

Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 02:18:28 UTC No. 16491155

>AI chat said
Never imagined that whatever replaced google would be even stupider but here we are. You can't just slice out the "vagina" code from your DNA and swap it with some dude's "penis" code.

>If it's physically possible, men willing to have sex with them would be considered gay or straight?
It's well established that futa = straight.

Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 08:20:56 UTC No. 16491408

>>16491155
Futa is a hermaphrodite. These are just females with male penises.

Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 16:30:15 UTC No. 16491659

>>16490361
Are you this guy?:
>>16490361

Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 16:31:31 UTC No. 16491662

>>16491659
Sorry referenced wrong post. Should be this:
>>>/adv/32354456