Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:22:29 UTC No. 16491703

Modern day stemfags are mostly left
some because they haven't thought anything other than consooming media, some want to talk on topics such as race, genetics and larp as supreme authority, others are scared that right government would cut funding to their field

Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 17:26:28 UTC No. 16491708

>>16491703
>Modern day stemfags are mostly left
Honestly no, most are conformists that would say anything to not be bothered

Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 21:57:45 UTC No. 16492008

I like Dawkins because he's like a midwit who makes other midwits mad lol. Especially his stance on trannies and eugenics (they work but we should be CULTURAL christians about them though)

Anonymous at Sun, 24 Nov 2024 23:16:59 UTC No. 16492075

>>16491558
>Why biologists are such midwits in comparison to other stem people?
>posts pic of Dawkins

OK retard ESL OP

Dawkins IQ mogs 99% of scitards. Seeing how he triggers religitards is just funny. Not his fault your god hypothesis is trash though.

Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 01:07:47 UTC No. 16492215

>>16491708
this. I don't give a fuck about what you have to say unless it pertains to practical matters or my field

raphael at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 02:58:40 UTC No. 16492353

>>16491558
average bio grad is 110 FSIQ so theyre dumb as shit

Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 04:05:02 UTC No. 16492404

>>16492075
>OK retard ESL OP
Ad hominim
>Dawkins IQ mogs 99% of scitards
fallacy of defective induction
>Not his fault your god hypothesis is trash though.
strawman fallacy
>Seeing how he triggers religitards is just funny.
I'm not religious

Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 12:21:56 UTC No. 16492716

>>16491558
>pic of Dawkins
you're unironically stupid. He's arguably more intelligent than some physicists, maybe not in the math/IQ sense or understanding very difficult concepts, but he's rational and doesn't get lost in his own sauce (Michio Kaku is a prime example of a physics schizo)

being rational in general is much more important than being good at math

Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:48:15 UTC No. 16492981

>>16492716
Op is right though bio fags are also mogged verbally

Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 23:00:32 UTC No. 16493436

>>16492404
Fallacy fallacy

Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 23:09:09 UTC No. 16493445

In my opinion it was wise hell expenditure.

Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 23:10:54 UTC No. 16493447

>>16493445
It was a white wash and straight reversal of the war crime, which is super harsh. Revenge more than a hundredfold.

ENOUGH

Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 23:13:37 UTC No. 16493449

>>16493447
This is why you engage in diplomacy before war, so you're not actually risking crime punishment. Yes, you let the enemy know you're coming and why. This is the art of politics.

Anonymous at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 23:17:01 UTC No. 16493450

>>16493449
Think, they are ready for you(so what?) so you skip the easy surprise of a crimes level. And a simple turn like that makes the situation less criminal and impossible that way.

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 03:00:14 UTC No. 16493638

>>16493436
No, you are just wrong because you said bullshit without argumentation and evidences and your comment doesn't make sense without all these fallacies

raphael at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 08:09:04 UTC No. 16493862

>>16493638
>>16493436
ROFL

i agree with anon these are fallacies

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 20:02:53 UTC No. 16494378

>>16492008
He is a good midwit

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 12:43:49 UTC No. 16495055

>>16493862
Clown

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 13:18:36 UTC No. 16495071

>>16491558
All science is on a continuum between math and stamp collecting.
Biology is the most stamp collecting science. You don't do your own calculations or solve things with deep thinking, you see what's there already, catalogue, memorize, and argue about how to organize.

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 13:45:04 UTC No. 16495088

>>16492404
NTA
>Ad hominim
False.to be an Ad Hominem fallacy the attack must be presented as an actual argument.
This was merely an insult.
>fallacy of defective induction
You might mean the informal fallacy of defective induction, especially since Dawkins' IQ is not public.

the real problem is this
>>16491558
Is not an argument, it is merely a statement of unsupported personal opinions. Since OP made no formal argument the replies cannot be fallacies.

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 15:24:45 UTC No. 16495155

>>16491558
>most left leaning
stopped reading right there

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 15:52:49 UTC No. 16495179

>>16495155
It's true, most left leaning stem people

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 16:00:53 UTC No. 16495188

>>16495179
>glorified trade schoolers vote republican
I'm not surprised.

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 16:08:21 UTC No. 16495193

>>16495088
>unsupported personal opinions
Fact for left leaning
>>16495179
Fact for mediocre standardized test performance
>>16492981
Fact for lunatic there are no information available but biology is associated with higher mental illness factors
>More women
>Higher divorce rate
>Left leaning
>Since OP made no formal argument the replies cannot be fallacies.
It can be, it's just listing of facts that could be responded by fallacies. Fallacies are not limited only to formal statements

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 16:11:25 UTC No. 16495195

>>16495193
This pic is percentage of divorces btw

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 16:11:49 UTC No. 16495196

>>16495193
>Fact for left leaning
I'm so far to the right I bet cash money that you're a fucking socialist compared to me.

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 16:13:04 UTC No. 16495198

>>16495179
>Thinks all Bilogists, mathematiciand, Enineers, etc are professors.
lol
The COMPETENT ones have real jobs in the private sector

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 16:14:05 UTC No. 16495199

>>16495193
>Fallacies are not limited only to formal statements
Thanks for proving you lack the education to understand actual Logic

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 16:15:28 UTC No. 16495201

>>16495193
>List of random occupations with numbers
>no definitions or explanations
>no sources
OP confirmed for tryhard pseud

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 16:17:44 UTC No. 16495204

>>16495199
>Tell a fact
>Respond with statement I didn't tell then making some bullshit up and "proving" I'm wrong isn't fallacy in your opinion
This is your picture

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 16:18:46 UTC No. 16495207

>>16495201
https://www.monster.com/career-advice/article/job-divorce-rate-1017

raphael at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 19:00:53 UTC No. 16495358

>>16495055
whats your iq?

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 10:56:52 UTC No. 16496074

>>16495196
Try to impress me

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 13:24:03 UTC No. 16496145

Your only interaction with biologists has been through twitter and podcast clips.

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Nov 2024 06:44:20 UTC No. 16496930

>>16496145
No, my professor is the thing I described

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Nov 2024 07:47:33 UTC No. 16496983

>>16491558
>Why biologists are such midwits in comparison to other stem people?
Every time there’s a bio thread on this board made by some mathfag asking a stupid question they display a staggering level of retardation. See: every race/evolution thread

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Nov 2024 20:03:48 UTC No. 16497477

>>16496983
What do they say? Can you give a summary?

🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 29 Nov 2024 20:37:38 UTC No. 16497531

Dawkins devoted his career to arguing that belief in God was immoral while at the same time arguing that objective morality doesn't exist. He is either schizo or low IQ, possibly both. Definitely an emotional thinker rather than a rational one

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Nov 2024 22:37:35 UTC No. 16497641

>>16491703
THiS.
If you spend half your brains processing power rationalizing non-sensical leftists view points, and make it a habit, you basically limit your self. Its sort of like how christcu-ckism turn ancient greek intellectuals into people arguing about how many angels fit on the head of a pin. Leftism is doing this to science now.

Anonymous at Sun, 1 Dec 2024 02:40:34 UTC No. 16498819

>>16495198
>The COMPETENT ones have real jobs in the private sector
This.

Anonymous at Sun, 1 Dec 2024 04:42:22 UTC No. 16498878

>>16495198
They are representative of general trend. And people who work in industry are not so much right wing as you would expect, and certainly not mire right wing as other fields

Anonymous at Sun, 1 Dec 2024 05:19:53 UTC No. 16498906

>>16491558
You write like an engineering undergrad.

Anonymous at Mon, 2 Dec 2024 13:29:22 UTC No. 16500154

>>16498906
why?

raphael at Mon, 2 Dec 2024 16:09:01 UTC No. 16500260

>>16495358
i thought so

Anonymous at Mon, 2 Dec 2024 19:09:34 UTC No. 16500471

>>16492716
Shizos are based, midwits aren't

Anonymous at Tue, 3 Dec 2024 00:24:02 UTC No. 16500714

>>16491558
They have feelings for animals. That's basically what happens. Maths is not involved. It's not really science, just feelings.

Anonymous at Tue, 3 Dec 2024 09:57:28 UTC No. 16501070

>>16491558
Dawkins is smart because he correctly realised that God doesn't exist

Anonymous at Wed, 4 Dec 2024 05:53:41 UTC No. 16501877

>>16501070
Upvote

Anonymous at Wed, 4 Dec 2024 20:44:32 UTC No. 16502635

>>16500714
Explains woman occupation there

Anonymous at Thu, 5 Dec 2024 08:21:10 UTC No. 16503364

>>16491558
this retard debunks his own pathetic copes about race and intelligence

Anonymous at Thu, 5 Dec 2024 17:58:31 UTC No. 16503762

>>16503364
Truly the midwit of midwits

Anonymous at Fri, 6 Dec 2024 06:07:39 UTC No. 16504584

Very high quality post

Anonymous at Fri, 6 Dec 2024 20:34:04 UTC No. 16505144

>>16492404
Fucking owned him!