Image not available

1200x852

balls cancer.jpg

🗑️ 🧵 HRT causes testicular cancer

Anonymous No. 16491883

NEW study finds testicular cancer rate 26.5x higher in males undergoing "gender-affirming" orchiectomies (removal of testicles).

Evidence suggests puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones are causing testicular cancer.
A study of 458 men shows they are 26.5 times more likely to develop testicular cancer after long term treatment with cross-sex hormones or puberty blockers.

All cases in the study occurred after at least 2 years of feminizing hormone therapy.

Anonymous No. 16491914

>>16491883
Is not hrt

Simply isn't affect all males

Anonymous No. 16491919

Sounds like a win-win to me. Good girls should be getting their balls snipped anyways

Anonymous No. 16491928

>>16491883
>Fang Ming Deng
lmao

Anonymous No. 16491968

>>16491883
>orchiectomies (removal of testicles).
How can they get testicular cancer is they have their testicles removed? Am I missing something (not my balls, just checked)?

Anonymous No. 16491969

>>16491883
This was already known previously just shows again that the troons aren't doing it for fun as some assume they do (e.g. chaining their gender every single week.) they actually take the risk of cancer because they're so uncomfortable in their own skin.

Anonymous No. 16491971

>>16491969
You're assuming they're acting rationally and are well informed. Neither is a good assumption.

Image not available

623x743

butthurt chink.jpg

Anonymous No. 16492110

>>16491928
why are you so mean to chinks?
you make them look like this
and sound like this:
>datz lacist!!!!

Anonymous No. 16492273

>>16491883
Good think they cut their balls off then, isn't it.

Raphael No. 16492302

>>16491883
Good

Anonymous No. 16492405

>>16491968
when they do the surgical sterilization, they conveniently get easy tissue samples to send to the lab. then they can analyze those for effects of the previous chemical sterilization.

Anonymous No. 16492417

>>16491969
If you're signing up for an elective castration because you're "uncomfortable in your own skin" you are not competent to be making medical decisions for yourself.

Anonymous No. 16492433

>>16492417
While thats true, its also true that someone of that nature is genetically inferior and should be castrated in order to assure that their inferior genetics is not passed on to future generations of humanity

Image not available

586x571

1711772616296857.png

Anonymous No. 16492440

>>16491883
I don't believe you, though.

Anonymous No. 16492445

>>16491883
trannies normally get their testicles removed in the first place, either because they're getting sexual reassignment surgery and it's all going to be gone, or because it makes the medical regimen easier. So long as you have balls you either need a high enough estrogen dose to suppress the natural androgen production, which for some people can be quite high, or you need to take antiandrogens which often have short term or long term side effects and are undesirable to take for potentially the rest of your life.
so most trannies conveniently get their balls removed regardless of testicular cancer

Anonymous No. 16492466

What about taking testosterone as a man? i require gender affirming care as I identify as a male pro max [2029 leaked]. Surely it lowers risk of testicular cancer since it makes the balls small and stop working, right?

Anonymous No. 16493286

>>16492273
No, they should die.

Image not available

941x919

IMG-20241125-WA0002.jpg

Anonymous No. 16493303

>>16492433
This. If you ever identify as trans, you should be enrolled to get immediate government paid for castration. Not a sex change surgery, just a ball chop
Because you're clearly too fucked up to bring children into this world.

Since that isn't the case, people like Chris Chan are allowed to have children, which is pretty horrific.

Anonymous No. 16493320

>>16493303
Why not just a vasectomy?

Anonymous No. 16493332

>>16493320
So you're externally tagged and shamed for life as a mentally stunted retard

Anonymous No. 16493363

>>16491883
isn't this just a consequence of it being way easier to find tiny tumors in removed dead tissue than living tissue still attached to the patient?

Image not available

679x458

1719456449484839.jpg

Anonymous No. 16493367

>>16491883
>testicular cancer rate 26.5x higher
>in males without testicles

?????????

Anonymous No. 16493371

>>16493332
Where do you live that people walk around with their genitals showing?

Anonymous No. 16493377

>>16493367
I asked that too but as >>16492405 pointed out, OP's wording isn't reflective of the chronology of the subjects of the study.

Anonymous No. 16493379

>>16492405
right but this is then compared to detected testicular cancer rates in the general population, who have not conveniently had their balls removed for testing
the two groups aren't comparable

Anonymous No. 16493751

>>16493363
i want to see the incidence in trans women without orchi

>>16492466
>Surely it lowers risk of testicular cancer since it makes the balls small and stop working, right?
i mean estrogen does that as well so

Image not available

1280x720

cancerx.webm

Anonymous No. 16493899

Anonymous No. 16494553

>chink scientists
into the trash bin it goes

sage No. 16494845

>>16491883
1 out of every 3 females will develop a myoma.
It’s just that at the point where they develop them nobody checks and it’s not that big of a deal most of the time, so nothing happens.

Anonymous No. 16495496

>>16491883
What destroying your endocrine system causes health issues, who would've thought?

Anonymous No. 16495518

>>16491969
the doctors probably don't even inform them about the side effects
>were you informed about the side effects of the Covid vaccine

Image not available

717x587

CEM2348723_152832....png

Anonymous No. 16495762

>>16493899
>ack!