Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 07:19:08 UTC No. 16493830

>>16493818
Possibly, but then we have no explanation for why space and everything in it only expanded and developed until this finite point. This implies some kind of beginning (bing bang) and a finite amount of time between now and that beginning. What was going on before?

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 07:20:36 UTC No. 16493832

Trvth

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 09:00:32 UTC No. 16493885

>>16493818
If nothing changes from one second to the next, then time may as well not have passed. Unrecorded periods of stasis may have existed before our current period of constant change.

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 11:03:57 UTC No. 16493923

>>16493818
Time doesn't exist. Only space is real.

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 11:49:37 UTC No. 16493952

>>16493818
The more you learn, the less you will like what you learn. Plan accordingly.

>>16493830
More Big Bang 20th century clap trap drivel.

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 21:09:07 UTC No. 16494458

>>16493818
>Think about it
No. This is not a philosophy (faggot ass pseud) board. Study it, run experiments, test hypotheses, and verify theories. Science is not a spectator sport.

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 22:09:01 UTC No. 16494554

>>16494458
Following your logic the hypothesis that micro-organisms exist was worthless before the invention of the microscope. Fair enough but doesn't that mean that science should focus on AI development for now to enhance our perception and cognition so that we can make significant leaps in our understanding again?

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 22:18:28 UTC No. 16494565

>>16494554
>Untestable hypothesis is worthless
Yep
>Focus on AI development
Yep
>To enhance our perception and cognition
Retard

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 22:23:04 UTC No. 16494570

>>16493818
More like (0,1], imho.

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 22:33:35 UTC No. 16494577

>>16493885
Pre-Higgs field local stability, all was photons. No mass, no time. Small. Hot. Everything at c, pure information, complete chaos.
And then the Higgs split out at some constant, non-zero value, and a ton of stuff become just stuff, not just impulse amd wavelength, but stuff.
Higgs field hugged the fucking universe and shit squirted out when it did.
(0,1], not (inf,1].

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 22:37:23 UTC No. 16494579

>>16494458
>Science is not a spectator sport.
We don't all science for Man U, or The Dallas Cowboys. Some of us are lifetime G league or even undergraduate intramural lab aides, you know.

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 22:39:28 UTC No. 16494580

>>16494565
>Retard
If not augmenting perception and cognition what is the alternative potential of AI besides realizing a dystopian movie?

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 22:50:21 UTC No. 16494587

>>16494580
Retard

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 22:59:54 UTC No. 16494598

>>16494587
[ math ](0,1] vs (-inf,1][ /math ]

Anonymous at Tue, 26 Nov 2024 23:20:43 UTC No. 16494632

[math](0,1][/math] vs [math](-\infty,1][/math]

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 05:47:27 UTC No. 16494889

>>16493818
>the present
Lol. You don't feel in present, only in past.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 16:00:12 UTC No. 16496247

>>16493818
>>This is the nature of time in a 3 dimensional model.
Just because the human mind is limited to perceiving space in three dimensions does not necessarily mean that reality only works in three dimension (+time). Thus, a three-dimensional model may well be inadequate.