Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 14:56:13 UTC No. 16495141

why do chuds act like whites going extinct is some tragic phenomena?

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 14:56:46 UTC No. 16495143

>>16495141
So you think races are different species? Fascinating.

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 15:23:58 UTC No. 16495153

>>16495137
Because most times it is due to human impact, if it were due to natural impact the ecological consequences on the human population would be minimal but since it is a sudden disruption in the ecological systems involved then it is a problem

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 15:24:33 UTC No. 16495154

>>16495153
Humans are natural, you dunce.

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 15:28:06 UTC No. 16495157

>>16495154
Retard. If it's caused by humans, it's artificial by definition, and that is the opposite of natural.

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 15:33:47 UTC No. 16495163

>>16495143
are you retarded? because inventing stuff in a comment is pretty retarded.

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 15:39:23 UTC No. 16495167

>>16495137
Some endangered species are pretty cool like rhinos. I hope we can resurrect wooly mammoths soon using Jurassic Park tech.

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 16:00:11 UTC No. 16495186

>>16495157
So humans aren't natural or bound by natural law?

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 16:36:36 UTC No. 16495231

>>16495137
Extinctions remind humans of their own mortality.

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 17:37:33 UTC No. 16495273

>>16495157
An arbitrary distinction. Other animals can use tools and cause sudden disruptions as well. Why do beavers get a pass for destroying ecosystems with their dams?

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 17:47:28 UTC No. 16495287

>>16495186
Our creations aren't natural.

>>16495273
Beavers aren't humans, so they can't do anything artificial.

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 17:59:41 UTC No. 16495294

>>16495287
>Our creations aren't natural
Define natural

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 18:05:51 UTC No. 16495303

>>16495294
Not man-made.

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 18:06:31 UTC No. 16495304

>>16495287
>Beavers aren't humans, so they can't do anything artificial
I see, no reading comprehension. Pity.

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 18:07:35 UTC No. 16495305

>>16495303
Is the fat, man-made shit i just clogged your mom's toilet with natural?

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 18:07:58 UTC No. 16495306

>>16495304
>no reading comprehension. Pity.
It is. You should work on that.

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 18:10:56 UTC No. 16495309

>>16495305
>Is man-made natural?
Now there's a conundrum.

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 18:14:21 UTC No. 16495314

>>16495309
Conversing with you irl must be truly bizzare
>someone says they took a shit
>"OMG THAT'S NOT NATURAL"

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 18:15:57 UTC No. 16495315

>>16495314
Stop playing with your poop, and that won't happen.

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 18:19:47 UTC No. 16495324

>>16495315
>mention taking a shit
>Anon immediately thinks about playing with it
You're only making yourself look more unhinged

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 18:22:11 UTC No. 16495327

>>16495324
Otherwise good point, but we were actually talking about beavers and extinction here, and you suddenly wanted to talk about shit. I'm the adult here, so I shouldn't have indulged you, and I do apologise for that.

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 18:59:31 UTC No. 16495354

>>16495303
But man is natural, an extension of nature, thus everything man does is, by definition, natural

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 19:24:19 UTC No. 16495377

>>16495354
>everything is natural
Powerful.

Anonymous at Wed, 27 Nov 2024 23:41:13 UTC No. 16495603

>>16495137
OP extinction when?

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 03:47:23 UTC No. 16495837

>>16495354
Imagine a world where humans never evolved. Is it possible for the pictured structure to exist in said world?

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 03:59:05 UTC No. 16495847

>>16495137
Because some people have an inherent appreciation for nature’s beauty unlike some sweaty lard who sits at his desk all day contributing nothing to the world

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 04:39:38 UTC No. 16495868

>>16495273
They don't, they fucked it so its their responsibility to fix it, but beavers don't give a fuck. Humans on the other hand do care about their actions and their consequences on animals. Not too sure how we can convince those bastard beavers to be more considerate but I've got my theories.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 06:05:26 UTC No. 16495924

>>16495153
>>Because most times it is due to human impact,
so that's just deifying nature. nature=good inherently with some telos, humans=bad inherently with no telos, only chaos

To take power from feudalist societies, atheists determined there's no grand narrative and no grand goal. It's kind of weird atheists were lying.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 06:06:29 UTC No. 16495926

>>16495868
responsibility is a social construct determined by the bureaucratic upper caste running the society

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 06:19:06 UTC No. 16495933

It's just nice to have your homies live.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 07:41:56 UTC No. 16495996

>>16495273
>Why do beavers get a pass for destroying ecosystems with their dams?
They don’t, they’re a keystone species that improves ecosystems

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 07:55:50 UTC No. 16496006

>>16495273
>An arbitrary distinction.
No it is not. It is the opposite of "artificial". It is synonymous to the word anti-artificial or non-artificial. It is arbitrary as saying "the northern hemisphere is an arbitrary distinction from the southern hemisphere". No, it is not. If you posit a northern hemisphere, you automatically also posit the existence of a member of the contravalent set, which is the anti-north hemisphere. The trivial name for anti-north is "south".

Why have we invented the word "natural"? Because it's useful. Do you dispute that it's useful?

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 09:00:12 UTC No. 16496020

>>16495837
Imagine a world where bees never evolved. Is it possible for the pictured structure to exist in said world?

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 13:44:00 UTC No. 16496157

>>16496020
>made of wax
>does not require metallurgy
Yes, another animal could create that at some point, given enough time. An animal (besides man) will never harness metallurgy.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 14:03:53 UTC No. 16496168

>>16495154
Humans are parasites, and they're pushing the biosphere over the tipping point. You may say dying from sepsis is natural, but knowingly avoiding treatment goes against self preservation. Humans aren't supposed to be mere parasites, we are the sensory organ of the biosphere and our growth is comparable to that of undifferentiated cancer.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 20:16:26 UTC No. 16496503

>>16495137
I like tigers.

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Nov 2024 06:20:37 UTC No. 16496916

>>16495137
animals are cool

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Nov 2024 06:21:38 UTC No. 16496917

>>16495137
we are not getting anymore new animals so we got to not act like niggers and try to save the ones we have.