Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 03:01:45 UTC No. 16495793

>>16495786
>What are some examples of midwits who think they’re high IQ?
You

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 03:08:33 UTC No. 16495799

>>16495793
I deliberately worded that way because I knew the first response would be that :)

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 03:08:48 UTC No. 16495800

>>16495793
Fpbp.
You don't have near the IQ you think you do.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 03:10:36 UTC No. 16495803

>>16495800
Media literacycel or inner voicel?

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 03:16:51 UTC No. 16495813

>>16495803

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 03:38:33 UTC No. 16495830

>What are some examples of midwits who think they’re high IQ?

People who make posts on /sci/ in order to sneer at others and feel superior about their own intelligence, rather than anything relating to math or science.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 03:52:39 UTC No. 16495841

>>16495830
Sneering at others has nothing to do with intelligence, only midwits deluded themselves into thinking that complete non sequitur was true

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 04:40:27 UTC No. 16495870

>>16495841
But unjustified self-fellatio is not the mark of a superior intellect. Nearly everyone is a midwit or below, so you can call any idea a midwit idea and be technically correct. But it only makes sense to do that if one assumes that they are enough of a genius to set themselves above the rest of the world, which is probably false.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 04:43:02 UTC No. 16495872

>>16495870
>unjustified self-fellatio is not the mark of a superior intellect
You just made this up and the OP post is not self fellatio. Cope midwit.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 04:45:45 UTC No. 16495873

>>16495872
waaaah

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 14:59:14 UTC No. 16496200

Everyone talks about IQ but no one talks about capability. You can have the highest IQ in the world but if you're not capable of using it in any meaningful way then its just novelty.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 15:28:28 UTC No. 16496222

>>16495799
Yes, you got the predictable result from you posting something stupid. That doesn't make you less stupid or the reaction any less true. You made this thread because you're a lonely troll who seeks to feel part of a community by creating a group to share a feeling of superiority over. We see a couple of these types of posts each week.
You're probably the proverbial "bright but lazy" type who actually is only smart compared to the rest of your family and social circle. You have jealousy for those smarter than you, which is most everyone who graduated high school (you probably have a GED because you fancy yourself too smart for school but really you're dumb and lazy). But if you can convince a couple of other anons to join in with you on shitting on people who are actually smarter than you, you can make the intrusive thoughts about your true nature go away for a few hours.
Good luck anon. Most of us will be with our loving families tonight while you eat your Banquet tv dinner and pretend you didn't want to have a meal with your dysgenetic family anyway.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 17:58:13 UTC No. 16496373

>>16496200
This, I know a few Mensa geniuses who are wicked smart and believe they're God's gift to humanity, but are barely self sufficient. They have to call a handyman to fix the smallest inconveniences around them because they're incapable of critical problem solving and repairing things themselves.
>>16496222
Kek, OP btfo'd

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 21:32:17 UTC No. 16496556

>>16496222
>Writes a paragraph of nothing but conjecture calling someone else dumb for the same reason they are doing in their very post
You’re literally too low IQ to realize the irony, you should give up

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 21:33:39 UTC No. 16496559

>>16496373
>>16496200
Not really. Higher capacity for pattern recognition is not useless even if you’re not actively doing something

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 22:23:36 UTC No. 16496597

>>16496559
Recognizing patterns doesn't mean shit if you aren't doing something with that recognition. That's like a fatass recognizing he's a gross fatty, but not actually changing his routine to fix it.

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Nov 2024 00:03:49 UTC No. 16496678

>>16496597
You’re always doing something when you recognize patterns. You can understand how people think, and why they think it.
“Without doing anything with it” means what? Doing what YOU want them to do? That’s just dumb.

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Nov 2024 01:23:56 UTC No. 16496734

>>16495799
>>16495803
>>16495841
>>16495872
>>16496556
>goes on a board for science and math
>makes pretentious timewasting thread about how everyone who disagrees with you is stupid
>spergs out and hurls insults at the slightest pushback
I want to believe that you are under 18.

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Nov 2024 01:28:15 UTC No. 16496740

>>16496734
>WAAAAAH I GOT CALLED A MIDWIT MOMMY HELP

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Nov 2024 10:00:19 UTC No. 16497033

>>16495786
People that are full of themselves. Screaming and coercing your point doesn't make you any more right. Lacking common decency and sensibility has never been a sign of high intelligence.

Anonymous at Fri, 29 Nov 2024 11:50:18 UTC No. 16497098

>>16496200
IQ doesn't predict individual success (it doesn't measure anything like sanity, social skills, creativity, work ethic, etc) but it's crucial for societal success - there are no successful low IQ societies

Anonymous at Sat, 30 Nov 2024 17:28:38 UTC No. 16498353

>>16495786
People who prattle about "media literacy" are annoying af

🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 30 Nov 2024 17:30:06 UTC No. 16498355

>>16495786
boards.4chan.org/sci/