Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 16:53:05 UTC No. 16496306

Stop reading popsci headlines, you idiot.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 17:51:50 UTC No. 16496366

>>16496299
>scientists discover some interesting new phenomenon about quantum entanglement with a single particle in the LHC running at full power
>headlines: WERE TELEPORTING PEOPLE NOW
You're a stupid nigger if you believe any of those headlines in earnest.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 18:03:07 UTC No. 16496387

>>16496366
other than clickbait, what purpose do these retarded headlines serve exactly? Are they really that lucrative to spend all the time / energy on creating / publishing them?

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 18:08:56 UTC No. 16496393

>>16496387
>other than clickbait, what purpose do these retarded headlines serve exactly?
none, its clickbait to make money, thats it

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 19:18:21 UTC No. 16496456

>>16496387
Pretty much. Ad revenue is shockingly profitable. It doesn't take much time to shit out a completely un-researched article, and it's gotten even quicker with AI. Even if most of the people are clicking out of incredulous disbelief, it's still a click.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 19:46:23 UTC No. 16496474

>>16496456
What specific resources are needed to get in on this $$ making scheme? There's a near infinite amount of 'hook' ideas I could come up with to get morons thinking "oooooooo. Wow! looky here, I NEED to know moar about THIS!!"

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 19:46:34 UTC No. 16496476

>>16496299
>reseeding headline
I see what you did there

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 20:13:38 UTC No. 16496502

>>16496474
A web page that looks like a science news outlet that's believable enough to fool retards, preferably running on a home server so there's pretty much no overhead. Populate it with a bunch of AI genned articles that have half a basis in reality and absolutely load the site full of ad space. Then buy some ads on other sites to get some traffic to your page and presto, you're printing money.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 20:21:23 UTC No. 16496504

>>16496502
How would one handle income taxes on this venture?

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 20:25:06 UTC No. 16496505

>>16496504
You would probably have to 1099 it, but why would you?

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 20:32:03 UTC No. 16496509

>>16496387
Popular Mechanics did this same bullcrap even before the web.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 20:50:54 UTC No. 16496526

>>16496505
"death and taxes".
Even if the risk of "no 1099 filed" being found out is only 5%, why risk it? The IRS can really screw up lives if they don't get their share.

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 22:08:27 UTC No. 16496589

>>16496299
They could teleport hair folicles from the pubes to the head as a side effect if they wanted

Anonymous at Thu, 28 Nov 2024 23:51:42 UTC No. 16496668

>>16496299
balding IS solved dumbass