🧵 /sfg/ - Spaceflight General
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 14:44:42 UTC No. 16535033
Jacklyn - edition
previous >>16532468
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 14:46:38 UTC No. 16535035
>>16535033
Nooglen lands in one piece without falling over or exploding: yes or no?
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 14:49:08 UTC No. 16535037
blue origin jack glenn?
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 14:49:35 UTC No. 16535038
When Raptor 3?
When ship catch?
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 14:50:05 UTC No. 16535042
>>16535035
https://strawpoll.com/kogjRDj32g6
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 14:51:48 UTC No. 16535043
>>16535035
No
It either aborts steering off away from the pad or misses completely
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 14:52:35 UTC No. 16535044
>>16535036
earth after the martians glassed the planet
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 15:01:32 UTC No. 16535048
>>16535036
I miss this ugly piece of shit more and more each day
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 15:03:53 UTC No. 16535050
>>16535048
Callisto is not ugly. It looks like the night sky in planet form.
It will also be the home of Arcadia, the city where the UJE (United Jovian Empire) will be ruled from (by me).
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 15:05:27 UTC No. 16535052
>>16535050
Why is Jupiter tilted 30 degrees from the plane of the Milky Way? Grok sucks.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 15:17:32 UTC No. 16535059
>Speaking of the vice president, it's unlikely that the National Space Council will be reconstituted under JD Vance
we're getting rid of the space council?
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 15:18:16 UTC No. 16535060
Why is everyone on social media talking about anti gravity tech
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 15:21:03 UTC No. 16535063
>>16535042
50/50 chads keep winnin'
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 15:25:09 UTC No. 16535065
>>16535035
I'll be surprised if it makes it past max q, let alone staging.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 15:26:47 UTC No. 16535067
>>16535036
fuck off.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 15:28:52 UTC No. 16535070
>>16535060
the schizo had it in his manifest or something
talking about how the drones flying over the US that got people riled up a little while ago (which made propeller noises btw) are actually chinese gravity tech.
there's a nonzero chance that the schizo who had a melty on /sfg/ not too long ago went critical and decided to blow up a cybertruck.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 15:41:45 UTC No. 16535081
>>16535059
whats the purpose? sounds like some pointless committee
fuck bureucracy
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 15:58:25 UTC No. 16535098
>>16535081
>fuck bureucracy
on it
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 16:00:47 UTC No. 16535101
>>16535059
Elon is the space council.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 16:04:54 UTC No. 16535108
>>16535070
amazing
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 16:12:50 UTC No. 16535111
>>16535098
the Frieren Aviation Administration
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 16:25:33 UTC No. 16535121
>>16535036
oh hiiiiii!!!!!!!!! XD
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 16:36:25 UTC No. 16535130
>>16535111
What’s the point of the rocket engine then?
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 16:37:01 UTC No. 16535131
test
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 16:43:34 UTC No. 16535137
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 16:45:08 UTC No. 16535140
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 16:45:09 UTC No. 16535141
>>16535036
We absolutely must industrialize this rock. Even if Elon doesn't want to do it.
The future is building spaceships and launching them from the lunar surface where there is barely any gravity. We can sojourn to any point in the solar system and beyond from there.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 17:04:40 UTC No. 16535166
>>16535141
its very likely that it will be colonized but it will probably be after we're dead
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 17:07:05 UTC No. 16535170
>>16535111
fuck off weeb
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 17:07:32 UTC No. 16535172
>>16535141
>the moon is a gateway
lrn2deltav
the moon is a detour
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 17:09:33 UTC No. 16535173
>>16535172
all i see here is that LEO needs to be established as a 'staging orbit' to act as a logistics hub for cargo & crew to either the moon or mars
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 17:14:01 UTC No. 16535179
>>16535178
oh god
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 17:15:14 UTC No. 16535183
we need to land some shit on mercury. I don't care how high the delta V requirements are. gravity assist off venus twice, make the probe tiny, whatever. just get it done.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 17:16:17 UTC No. 16535186
>>16535183
it's unironically a boring rock
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 17:17:02 UTC No. 16535188
>>16535186
they all are but it's the most obvious boring rock we have yet to put something on.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 17:19:27 UTC No. 16535194
>>16535186
It has interesting properties, and it's the only one of the terrestrial planets we don't have surface photos from yet.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 17:26:42 UTC No. 16535199
>>16535130
Spells have ranges, rockets can work even when you can't see them anymore.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 17:34:33 UTC No. 16535204
>>16535183
I'd rather land something on Ceres
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 17:37:07 UTC No. 16535207
>>16535141
I'm starting to think Elon is regreting the HLS contract (that is if NASA forces them to complete the contract). Because I think he wanted to use it to flight test Starship but then have it cancelled at the last minute because 'it's too complex' or sth like that.
He's starting to show his real attitude (doesn't care about moon)
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 17:52:10 UTC No. 16535214
How much longer until somebody figures out a way to break humanity's dependence on chemical rocketry?
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 17:55:33 UTC No. 16535215
>>16535214
spin launch exists
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 17:58:18 UTC No. 16535217
>>16535207
Do you guys have any idea how dumb you look responding to Elon's comment about skipping the Moon while ignoring what he was responding to?
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 17:59:39 UTC No. 16535220
>>16535215
ahem
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zi
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ibS
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 18:00:04 UTC No. 16535221
>>16535219
Don't bother, I don't care.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 18:00:21 UTC No. 16535222
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 18:00:35 UTC No. 16535223
>>16535215
Alright but where are the fusion reactors to power the beam sailing spacecraft?
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 18:01:01 UTC No. 16535225
>>16535220
I didn't really believe in spinlaunch but if thunderfoot hates it I guess there must really be something to it.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 18:01:19 UTC No. 16535226
>>16535219
you mean there's a non-zero chance I might have argued with elon himself here and called him a retard? uh oh, sorry for that
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 18:01:36 UTC No. 16535227
>>16535221
The future of spaceflight hinges on the mental stability of our favorite autist
>>16535222
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 18:02:37 UTC No. 16535229
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 18:02:59 UTC No. 16535230
>>16535227
that's not elon, elon types the X logo with the double line
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 18:03:31 UTC No. 16535231
>>16535230
Just one of multiple signs that this is a troll.
Anon is dumb for falling for it.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 18:05:40 UTC No. 16535235
>>16535230
Why would he do that if he's pretending to be someone else? Lol. Also >>16535227 was deleted right after he posted it.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 18:06:52 UTC No. 16535237
>>16535141
That's Callisto dumbass
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 18:09:06 UTC No. 16535239
>>16535214
>How much longer until somebody figures out a way to break humanity's dependence on chemical rocketry?
A lot longer now that incredibly power dense (while still having good ISP) engines like Raptor exist.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 18:09:50 UTC No. 16535241
>>16535231
Everyone is dumb. People spent the last few weeks thinking that 737s are hyperdimensional Iranian attack drones and that fog is chemtrail vax smoke.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 18:09:59 UTC No. 16535242
>>16535220
Spinlaunch on Moon with a solar powered oxygen production makes the Moon attractive for missions to Mars.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 18:21:42 UTC No. 16535254
>>16535219
>"I was not believed"
>that filename
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 18:21:44 UTC No. 16535255
>>16535219
jesus this is really pathetic, you're showing us a tripfag preteding to be an elon wannabe dittmann.
can you just go back to /pol/?
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 18:27:11 UTC No. 16535259
>>16535219
I mean, it's just a tripfag. But if he lurks on /pol/, he's just 2 clicks away from sfg anyways, I'm sure he'd be curious as to what this website is saying about starship.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 18:28:58 UTC No. 16535261
>>16535259
If I were Elon I'd simply post anonymously, not as some attention-grabbing tripfag.
Duh.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 18:33:04 UTC No. 16535267
>>16535261
hi elon, pls consider covering all of mars with mattresses
thanks
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 18:43:53 UTC No. 16535284
>>16535111
>>16535098
insanely hot and cute
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 18:46:01 UTC No. 16535288
>>16535217
The moon is a distraction. DOGE will delete it, thankfully
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 18:47:37 UTC No. 16535289
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 18:49:26 UTC No. 16535292
>>16535288
if you guys hate the moon you should watch the latest sonic movie, won't give spoilers
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 18:51:23 UTC No. 16535293
I don't hate the Moon. I just think that it should be moved to another orbit between Dirt and Mars and become it's own planet
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 18:51:56 UTC No. 16535295
The New York Times admitted that scientists have been inventing bogus species to justify Endangered Species Act lawsuits since 1970.
Total Beetle Death
https://x.com/aarmlovi/status/18755
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 19:04:05 UTC No. 16535305
>>16535219
That's 100% Elon. Same talking points, same writing style.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 19:05:53 UTC No. 16535310
>>16535042
Two thirds of /sfg/ is retarded
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 19:06:52 UTC No. 16535313
a fucking O-ring
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 19:08:30 UTC No. 16535314
>>16535130
Maybe the magic only dispels the effect of gravity so you still need to accelerate the thing.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 19:11:08 UTC No. 16535315
>>16535310
I know right, who would choose "no" as an answer??
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 19:12:09 UTC No. 16535317
>>16535141
Gay argument by assertion.
If there's anything worth getting from the moon, there will be ventures moving that shit to orbital shipyards. But of course that relies on the cost of upmass falling dramatically, which removes most of the incentive for doing so.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 19:14:10 UTC No. 16535320
>>16535242
What is an onlyfans ratio?
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 19:16:12 UTC No. 16535321
>>16535315
The other 1/3
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 19:18:04 UTC No. 16535324
>>16535320
Oxidizer / Fuel
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 19:20:37 UTC No. 16535327
>>16535321
the remaining retards? yeah.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 19:23:07 UTC No. 16535330
>>16535327
the non-retarded answer should've been "N/A".
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 19:30:45 UTC No. 16535334
>>16535033
Will SpaceX send hydrogen to Mars so they only have to do atmospheric extraction instead of mining water, to gather all elements for making the fuel? It would be just 2 Starships of hydrogen. I wonder what they will send with the first 5 unmanned Starships to Mars, apparently Optimus robots but I am not sure how useful they will be in 2 years.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 19:34:28 UTC No. 16535336
>>16535293
Why? It's part of human culture since the ancient times and is the reason we even exist. It's a symbol of Earth's uniqueness and is something interesting to observe in the night sky.
Our real goals should be moving Ceres into Mars orbit, and moving Io into Venus orbit so our counterpart has a real moon.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 19:36:09 UTC No. 16535338
>>16535336
We should have like seven or eight big moons, on grounds that it'd look neat in the sky.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 19:37:52 UTC No. 16535340
>>16535336
if venus had a moon we would have figured out orbital mechanics by the time of the ancient greeks.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 19:40:52 UTC No. 16535344
>>16535305
It's the same talking points I use on /sfg/
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 19:40:53 UTC No. 16535345
>>16535340
It took them way too long to realise Venus had phases like Luna.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 19:40:57 UTC No. 16535346
>>16535255
See this >>16535229 screenshot he posted and then deleted, showing admin tools and the "view post engagements" that only shows up on your own posts, on an Elon post
>>16535261
Elon would definitely be a tripfag
>>16535305
This would be damning enough
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 19:42:23 UTC No. 16535348
>>16535336
>Why?
FUCK EARTH
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 19:42:36 UTC No. 16535349
>>16535292
does Dr Eggman piss on it?
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 19:43:25 UTC No. 16535350
I can't believe there are retards here falling for this obvious bait
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 19:45:22 UTC No. 16535353
>>16535214
When we get closed cycle gas core NTP so never
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 19:46:54 UTC No. 16535355
I can't wait for Flight 7! I'm so excited!
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 19:48:12 UTC No. 16535356
>>16535355
I'm waiting for Flight 1.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 19:50:00 UTC No. 16535357
>>16535350
They're not, they're actively attempting to push it on everybody else. It's the same pack of retards who were spamming about indians last week, and for the same reason. They think they're not instantly recognizable, because they're not very bright.
>>16535355
I'm eager to see the test sat deployment, the last pez dispenser door didn't fly so good and they must have improved the mechanism some since then.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 19:56:26 UTC No. 16535361
>it currently costs $100 million to send a lander to the moon
how much would it cost for starship to send a lander?
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 19:58:39 UTC No. 16535363
>>16535361
who are you quoting? chandrayaan 3 was about 88 million for everything.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:01:12 UTC No. 16535365
>>16535293
>move moon
>>16535336
>move ceres/io
lol. do you know how much energy it would take to do any of that shit? obviously not. these arent just small rocks but its like saying you are going to move Antarctica with a steamship.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:01:25 UTC No. 16535366
>>16535363
>third world prices
im talking about missions like intuitive machines
>NASA awarded Intuitive Machines a CLPS task order for the IM-1 mission in 2019 that is worth, after modifications, $118 million.
https://spacenews.com/final-prepara
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:05:03 UTC No. 16535368
>>16535133
these numbers are fake for africa
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:05:45 UTC No. 16535369
>>16535365
Ceres is tiny.
We can do it within a century.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:06:51 UTC No. 16535372
>>16535366
>government "inefficiency" prices
then it will continue to cost whatever they can convince nasa to pay regardless of launch vehicle costs.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:06:57 UTC No. 16535373
>>16535346
just some larping tripfag
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:08:20 UTC No. 16535374
We should try to colonise Antarctica. We've had permanently settled habitats there for decades, but we should try to get it self-sustaining. All nations come together to build a city in Antarctica. The Earth belongs to us.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:09:10 UTC No. 16535375
>>16535369
Its not about size but mass. and its the energy required to change its velocity. Moving a 9.1x10^20 kg object is like kardashev level 2 stuff.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:09:10 UTC No. 16535376
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:09:40 UTC No. 16535377
>>16535327
no, the non-retards
the comment you were replying to made that quite clear, make sure to read next time.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:09:41 UTC No. 16535378
>>16535375
Just do it bit by bit then. We don't have to do it in one go.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:11:33 UTC No. 16535380
>>16535334
No.
>>16535346
nobody cares, i'm pretty sure we established this.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:12:56 UTC No. 16535381
>>16535353
>le nuclear lightbulb
It's space, who cares about fallout. The solar winds will carry it away.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:13:55 UTC No. 16535382
Nuclear Pulse Propulsion is the only way to send manned missions to deep space or other solar systems
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:15:53 UTC No. 16535383
>>16535374
reminder that the Antarctica-Mars equivalency argument that we can't colonize mars because we can't colonize antarctica is retarded.
we CAN colonize antarctica, there's just stupid international rules in place that stop anything more than research outposts being built.
if prospectors were allowed to look beneath the antarctic ice sheets, i can bet you we'd have mining towns there a few years later.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:17:57 UTC No. 16535387
>>16535381
You wanted to totally replace chemical rockets. That's the only nuclear engine that doesn't spray fallout everywhere meaning you can launch from the ground
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:19:44 UTC No. 16535389
>>16535334
They need to mine water for people anyway.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:20:44 UTC No. 16535391
>>16535387
The rules say you can still use chemical rockets to get to leo
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:20:55 UTC No. 16535392
>>16535377
ah you're one of the retards, got it! I hope you can pick the non-retarded option next time, good luck!
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:21:30 UTC No. 16535394
What book about the Mercury age would you recommend?
Is "The right stuff" any good, or is it more propaganda?
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:22:31 UTC No. 16535396
>>16535387
There's also the Serpent NTP+Arcjet engine but the TWR on that is pretty bad.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:22:40 UTC No. 16535397
>>16535033
>Jacklyn
what happens when she sinks in a massive fiery bezos bomb?
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:22:44 UTC No. 16535398
>>16535376
When you realize Antarctica is a classic JRPG map.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:23:08 UTC No. 16535399
>>16535391
There just isn't a lot of interest in muke engines. Lockheed is supposed to launch and test one in 2027 but who knows if that will really happen
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:23:15 UTC No. 16535400
>>16535392
>no it's not fair, i'm part of the two-thirds who is retarded, how could this be happening to me!
>i know, i'll call him a retard instead, that'll set him straight!
No.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:25:48 UTC No. 16535401
>>16535334
>I wonder what they will send with the first 5 unmanned Starships to Mars
They need solar stations and rudimentary construction bots that can pave landing pads and make protective structures with rocks and dust.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:27:10 UTC No. 16535403
>>16535401
Have they actually talked about landing infrastructure before? Are they just going to yolo it with the first wave until they get humans there to build landing pads?
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:27:21 UTC No. 16535404
>>16535355
*Starship 7
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:31:19 UTC No. 16535405
>>16535370
2 weeks
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:33:39 UTC No. 16535406
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:36:59 UTC No. 16535410
>>16535033
Starship optimism bros... it's..... OVER
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:38:39 UTC No. 16535413
>>16535406
I used to have this picture printed out on office paper and stapled to my wall.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:38:48 UTC No. 16535414
>>16535410
There’s no way to sugarcoat this
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:40:12 UTC No. 16535416
>>16535400
oh nice, you save me the effort of greentexting you
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:40:13 UTC No. 16535417
>>16535410
They could have deployed payload if they really wanted. It's not the design goal of Starship to be expendable.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:41:05 UTC No. 16535419
>>16535417
Oh please
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:41:33 UTC No. 16535420
>>16535410
most people don't know this but the banana was deployed and used a kick stage to get itself to orbit
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:42:00 UTC No. 16535422
>>16535374
>>16535376
I bet there's tons of really old archeology under the ice that we don't even consider possible currently.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:46:07 UTC No. 16535424
Anons, how retarded/unfeasible is this idea for unmanned missions:
The idea would be to build a smaller version of LHC in space which would serve as the propulsion device for small probes (e.g. 100 grams or whatever), using lasers as power delivery and slowly applying electromagnetic propulsion to the object that we're trying to launch to other galaxies.
>Build a series of modular rings which will form a ring structure in space
>Launch and position the modules individually until they form this ring structure in whatever orbit is optimal
>Launch a relay station for power delivery, which will sit closer to earth
You'd fire a high power laser to the relay station, and the relay station would redirect the laser beam to one of the ring modules, the ring module would take some of that energy (while passing the rest of the laser beam to the next ring module) and push the probe to the next ring in the loop using electromagnetism. The cycle would repeat until you accelerate the object to the required speed, at some point you'd just let the object pass through the ring when it's aligned to your target destination.
how retarded is this on a scale from 1-10?
Aleph at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:46:08 UTC No. 16535425
>>16535033
WE NEED FUCKING GAS PLANETS FUCK MARS LETS JUST GROW SOME MOTHERFUCKING GANJA ON THAT SHIT
>>dead ass serious it's MADE for ganja
-anon /out/
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:50:52 UTC No. 16535427
>>16535033
OK why does it need a tug boat?
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:50:58 UTC No. 16535428
>>16535424
One ring explosion and Earth has to be abandoned in favor of the Galilean moons and Mars.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:51:22 UTC No. 16535429
>>16535424
I forgot to mention, you'd be increasing the speed of this object over the course of 2-3 years, or whatever is practical from the standpoint of our SOTA lasers
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:53:18 UTC No. 16535431
when is QI meme sat#2 launching / doing it's experiment (totally won't break this time, right?)
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:54:36 UTC No. 16535432
>>16535399
Draco, right? If they've still got the space forces support I'm sure it'll happen
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:55:26 UTC No. 16535433
>>16535431
2 weeks
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:56:53 UTC No. 16535434
>>16535401
>solar stations
Kek
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 20:59:27 UTC No. 16535437
>>16535431
okay I did some googling, looks like transporter 13, NET feb
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 21:00:00 UTC No. 16535439
>>16535428
In that case, would it be possible to position this ring structure reasonably far away from earth, assuming it doesn't compromise the power delivery too much? We'd be speeding up these objects inside the ring over the course of 2-3 years, or more, maybe there's wiggle room for a less than optimal laser power delivery
seems like the idea is more dangerous/risky than retarded
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 21:01:36 UTC No. 16535440
>>16535439
Possibly, I was merely referencing Cowboy Bebop.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 21:06:45 UTC No. 16535445
>>16535422
DONT DIG IN THE FUCKING ICE
t. William Dyer
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 21:06:56 UTC No. 16535447
>>16535427
barges don't have engines for travel
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 21:07:19 UTC No. 16535448
>>16535445
Who?
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 21:13:35 UTC No. 16535450
>>16535397
We make yo mama jokes in his replies on social media.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 21:14:48 UTC No. 16535451
>>16535050
>The likely presence of an ocean within Callisto leaves open the possibility that it could harbor life. However, conditions are thought to be less favorable than on nearby Europa.
Oh no non onon!
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 21:14:51 UTC No. 16535452
>>16535033
IT'S HAPPENING!!! THE JAPANESE ARE GOING TO THE MOON IN THIS MONTH!!
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 21:15:30 UTC No. 16535453
>>16535447
Why not?
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 21:17:02 UTC No. 16535454
>>16535452
And it's a rideshare with Astrobotic, isn't it?
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 21:19:16 UTC No. 16535455
>>16535453
SpaceX's landing barges are also towed out to sea.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 21:22:03 UTC No. 16535458
>>16535447
they do
>>16535427
regulations
automated ships can travel on they own in ports
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 21:22:48 UTC No. 16535459
>>16535453
It's the definition. Ships, including drone ships, can move under their own power. Barges can't.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 21:23:02 UTC No. 16535460
>>16535455
I said why not
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 21:23:20 UTC No. 16535461
>>16535458
*can't
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 21:26:20 UTC No. 16535462
>>16535416
>NO IT'S YOU NOT ME
why are you seething so hard?
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 21:28:43 UTC No. 16535463
>>16535462
hey man, you're the one who picked the retard option. You're in no position to criticize anyone lol
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 21:33:06 UTC No. 16535466
>>16535464
China is barely improving, wtf. What's the point of all that fearmongering?
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 21:33:08 UTC No. 16535467
>>16535403
Not sure about SpaceX specifically, but it's something that has been talked about in general.
It's easier to do on the moon because solar energy is so high that you can just use mirrors or lenses to melt regolith repeatedly
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 21:33:19 UTC No. 16535468
>>16535463
i didn't though, i picked the intelligent option, you and two thirds of /sfg/ picked the retard option, your inability to read text is just another indicator of your retardation.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 21:35:27 UTC No. 16535469
>>16535464
195, 70, 16, 4, 18, 20
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 21:35:54 UTC No. 16535470
>>16535464
New Zealand will surpass Russia
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 21:36:24 UTC No. 16535471
>>16535466
They have a lot of new launch vehicles cooking. I dunno about fearmongering but thems the breaks.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 21:36:38 UTC No. 16535472
>>16535464
US around 160-180, China below 80. Another year of Japan launching more than Europe.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 21:37:09 UTC No. 16535473
>>16535466
militarized thirdies like chinks and other shitholes are very insecure about themselves and usually adopt the foreign propaganda tactic of the "blowfish" kinda like that one scene from breaking bad, except it doesn't actually work and all it actually does is give MIC lobbyists in western countries ammo with which to fearmonger so they can sell a ridiculously overkill plan of preparation to politicians.
you saw this again recently with le chink 6th gen.
no doubt it's a capable plane but the blowfish dictates that they sell it like an unmatched UFO because hey, it's got no vertical stabilizers, nobody's EVER seen that before and it looks cool!
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 21:39:09 UTC No. 16535476
>>16535470
kek based
RocketLab = New Zealand
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 21:44:50 UTC No. 16535482
>>16535470
Maybe. Soyuz has launched pretty consistently over the last five years and that doesn't look like it's going to change this year. Rocket Lab's had ambitious predictions for the last few years that they've consistently failed to reach, mostly due to payload delays or lack of customers. Electron will need to have a very good year and Soyuz would need to have a very below average year.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 21:45:39 UTC No. 16535483
>>16535470
Rocket Lab is an American company my kiwi friend
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 21:55:59 UTC No. 16535490
>>16535468
>projection: the post
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 21:56:37 UTC No. 16535491
Good video about India's lasted spaceflight achievement
https://files.catbox.moe/yp0cs6.mp4
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 21:58:26 UTC No. 16535492
>>16535468
>>16535490
you guys still at it? why not redirecting all this hate towards the real enemy: venusians
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 22:06:25 UTC No. 16535498
>>16535492
>you guys still at it?
I don't even know what option he's talking about. But it's fun seeing a dumbass melting down
>the real enemy: venusians
no need to worry, they will never exist lmao. Not with their GAYloons at the very least
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 22:07:31 UTC No. 16535499
>>16535490
>if i say the word projection first after doing it for the entirety of the conversation they won't look at me
not how that works champ.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 22:09:08 UTC No. 16535501
case in point
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 22:11:01 UTC No. 16535504
These is a vishnu in space
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 22:25:27 UTC No. 16535512
>>16535491
well its true
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 22:35:03 UTC No. 16535522
>>16535464
>Estimates on 2025 numbers?
i lean towards 300 for global launches since it fits the trend (see pic). the safe estimate though is 250-300 launches. 250 if things go poorly, 300 if things go well. one of the NSF talking heads thinks 350 is possible, which is plausible but wildly optimistic imo.
>>16535466
china doesnt have enough payloads afaik. they only just started to launch some of their megaconstellation sats, so maybe their numbers will jump up this year.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 22:39:49 UTC No. 16535527
>>16535482
They're launching Neutron this year. Russia only had 4 more launches last year
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 22:46:46 UTC No. 16535529
>>16535527
to be fair, rocketlab is a company based in the US and their neutron operations are entirely in the US, neutron will probably never launch from new zealand unless they see use in launching polar missions from there, but that would require building a launch pad, support infrastructure and shipping neutrons all the way over there, just for better polar and SSO orbit performance
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 22:47:56 UTC No. 16535530
>>16535242
isnt it normal in ksp to refill fuel in minimus orbit instead of kerbin?
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 22:53:59 UTC No. 16535533
>>16535527
They're not launching Neutron this year
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 22:58:02 UTC No. 16535535
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 22:59:20 UTC No. 16535536
>>16535141
Lunar regolith is still a huge problem for any significant surface construction activity.
It's too abrasive.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:01:25 UTC No. 16535541
>>16535539
what a doofus
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:03:00 UTC No. 16535543
>>16535539
He's just telling the truth instead of pretending like it's some super special legal extenuating circumstance subpoena
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:05:15 UTC No. 16535546
>>16535539
is this real?
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:05:38 UTC No. 16535547
>fighting disinformation
cool story you got there
it would be a shame if something were to happen to it
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:05:46 UTC No. 16535549
>>16535546
I refuse to go on /x/, idk
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:08:17 UTC No. 16535551
>>16535539
>>16535546
>>16535549
It's fake.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:08:51 UTC No. 16535553
>>16535551
ngl embedded x posts would fix this
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:10:51 UTC No. 16535554
>>16535464
How many launches did Africa have?
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:11:13 UTC No. 16535555
>>16535033
5555 for Mercury!!!!!
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:12:57 UTC No. 16535558
>>16535539
what did you screenshot this on, a gameboy?
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:16:06 UTC No. 16535562
>>16535555
wtf I love mercury now!
you could have eskimos and hot tanned babes living a few blocks away
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:18:01 UTC No. 16535564
>>16535555
Why haven’t we done a mercury lander yet
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:21:25 UTC No. 16535565
>>16535555
made me think of this
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:23:26 UTC No. 16535567
>>16535295
>flagrantly admitting they have a bias for finding one result other than another in their ""scientific"" research
Shameful. Actually shameful.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:24:10 UTC No. 16535568
>>16535295
neat. who asked?
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:25:21 UTC No. 16535570
>>16535564
Because Europeans were too poor to have it on BepiColombo.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:26:09 UTC No. 16535572
>>16535568
I did. I asked. Now what? Bet you feel fucking embarrassed now, huh punk?!
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:26:48 UTC No. 16535573
>>16535452
>Japanese space mission
It will somehow fail. I don't know why but JAXA missions always seem to fail for one reason or another. Something about Japanese culture prevents their engineers from voicing concerns and addressing problems maybe.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:26:58 UTC No. 16535574
>>16535533
Yes they are
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:29:55 UTC No. 16535578
>>16535573
that's fine, I don't care. As long as the nips keep producing rocketgirl yuri I will consider it as plentiful contribution to the global space effort.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:30:03 UTC No. 16535579
>>16535570
Why the fuck would you sacrifice this for some shitty magnetometer or whatever the fuck it is? Who the fuck actually cares about any of that? I want to see a view from the surface of Mercury.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:31:31 UTC No. 16535580
>>16535572
all I care about is spaceflight. what you posted wasn't space. it wasnt flight. it wasnt spaceflight. thats the litmus test in case you were confused
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:31:40 UTC No. 16535581
>>16535578
I just wish Japan could be a global leader in technology and industry like their 80s and early 90s animes thought they would be.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:33:44 UTC No. 16535582
>>16535580
>all I care about is spaceflight.
wrong general
wrong board
wrong site
now go back to discussing indians, tesla explosions and bureaucratic corruption
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:34:26 UTC No. 16535583
>>16535581
Imagine space capsules having the aesthetics of a late 80s Sansui VCR, with the rubbery buttons.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:34:40 UTC No. 16535584
>>16535581
They never should have kneeled to Eurocentrism.
It would've been much more kino to have two major global powers; European and East Asian.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:37:17 UTC No. 16535586
>>16535580
>a major cause of launch and pad construction delays being exposed as intergenerational fraud going back to the Apollo days is not spaceflight
You are a gay mudfoot.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:40:50 UTC No. 16535587
>>16535586
Why should spacegods care about what libtard earthers say?
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:46:55 UTC No. 16535591
>>16535194
>It has interesting properties
like?
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:48:18 UTC No. 16535593
>>16535227
Having admin access wouldn't be indicative of this being Elon, as there are plenty of users in X who would have admin privileges besides Elon. This is common in most organizations, as admin privileges are trivial to get as an engineer depending on which department you're a part of. It's root privileges that are difficult to get and those are very well safeguarded. If that screenshot gave you root privileges and indicated as such, that would be way more likely that this impersonator is in fact Elon all along.
Mountains from molehills. 4chan is filled with retards, and troll culture means that people fall for dumb shit all the fucking time.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:51:25 UTC No. 16535595
>>16535589
>Merrimack
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:52:40 UTC No. 16535597
>>16535539
kek, anyone remember when elon doxed that teslaq "montana skeptic" guy
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:53:32 UTC No. 16535601
>>16535595
>first steel-clad battleships spent their first battle just pinging cannonballs off one another for hours
God history is hilarious sometimes.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:53:54 UTC No. 16535602
>>16535374
Colonizing Antarctica puts most of the sea costs of the world underwater by about 200 feet.
https://yaleclimateconnections.org/
https://modernsurvivalblog.com/natu
Everything up to 225' is underwater in this gif, So sure, we can colonize the south pole, but the majority of infrastructure of most countries and their population dense centers will be under water. Unless you can solve that crisis first, you can't colonize Antarctica.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:56:05 UTC No. 16535605
>>16535602
New plan: Start a new ice age so that coasts increase in size as water gets locked up in ice.
Imagine the Indonesian subcontinent. Imagine Doggerland reborn. We could have so much more land, bros.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:56:18 UTC No. 16535606
>>16535601
Imagine the sound inside those ships.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:57:27 UTC No. 16535608
>>16535606
and the spalling
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:58:13 UTC No. 16535609
>>16535605
Easy, use Starship to put up 2000T worth of solar sail material into a heliocentric orbit that eclipses the Earth from the Sun on a desired cadence. Unravel the sail so that it stays in relative orbit its in. Let the Earth get eclipsed for long longer than duration of the Moon does. Earth gradually cools and triggers a mini ice age. Most of 4chan dies, H-1B problem solved.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:58:43 UTC No. 16535610
>>16535608
I think the iron plate they used back then was soft enough that they didn't really have spalling issues. From what I've read the guys in those turrets were mostly unharmed but with rattled brains.
Anonymous at Sat, 4 Jan 2025 23:59:21 UTC No. 16535611
>>16535591
It's huge core and high gravity.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 00:00:01 UTC No. 16535613
>>16535611
Its*
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 00:01:45 UTC No. 16535614
>>16535226
there's a nonzero chance I called him a stupid frogposter, which is based
fuck you, Elon, quit posting frogs
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 00:08:06 UTC No. 16535618
>>16535617
Chinese I bet
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 00:08:50 UTC No. 16535619
>>16535617
from a UFO?
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 00:09:16 UTC No. 16535621
>>16535619
Unidentified Fallen Object
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 00:12:37 UTC No. 16535623
ipeed myself
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 00:19:41 UTC No. 16535628
>>16535553
doesnt 4chanx do embedded xitter posts?
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 00:19:42 UTC No. 16535629
>>16535623
if you had the foresight to leave some empty bottles sitting around you wouldn't have to suffer such an indignity.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 00:28:53 UTC No. 16535633
>>16535617
The gods must be CRAZY
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 00:44:30 UTC No. 16535638
>>16535595
Don't deadname the CSS Virginia!
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 00:50:37 UTC No. 16535644
>>16535602
>Unless you can solve that crisis first
We give people gills
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 01:01:24 UTC No. 16535651
>>16535610
>>16535606
Had a 2ft or more wood backing too
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 01:03:46 UTC No. 16535653
>>16535539
this is a pretty embarrassing attempt ngl, are you that desperate for attention anon?
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 01:05:36 UTC No. 16535658
>>16535602
but consider all the coastline we gain not only in Antarctica but also in land that's currently 50 miles inland. all in all I think its a net gain.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 01:05:47 UTC No. 16535659
>>16535578
part of my harem and both ready for cock
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 01:08:57 UTC No. 16535663
>>16535658
it isn't.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 01:31:23 UTC No. 16535692
>>16535651
Did the monitor turrets? I know the confederate ironclads did.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 01:32:44 UTC No. 16535694
>>16535036
I can see my house
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 01:33:20 UTC No. 16535696
>>16535175
Okay, which train gets me to West 81st and Columbus?
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 01:35:02 UTC No. 16535699
>>16535451
don't call it an ocean, it's a mantle
water is a rock that far out from the sun
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 01:36:58 UTC No. 16535700
>>16535060
Who cares.
Talking about it pisses off the Cult of Einstein so the more the better.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 01:38:07 UTC No. 16535702
>>16535070
>Schizo
Only sociopaths use that word. You talk like a sociopath so it makes sense.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 01:38:20 UTC No. 16535703
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 01:39:10 UTC No. 16535704
>>16535530
if you're mining on Minmus, fuel is very very cheap in orbit there
however, it's better in terms of hours spent to just refuel in LKO with propellant launched from the surface, especially if you have a reusable launch vehicle
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 01:41:28 UTC No. 16535706
>>16535578
is she back yet
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 01:45:11 UTC No. 16535709
>>16535703
>Talk mean about cult of Einstein
>Immediately they begin to cry
LOL
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 01:49:44 UTC No. 16535710
>>16535491
Murdoch Murdoch type shiet
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 01:50:25 UTC No. 16535711
>>16535530
>>16535704
I use Pol as my gas station in the Jool system but I don't bother mining at Minmus hardly.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:00:56 UTC No. 16535714
>>16535060
Most physicists are essentially bakers for the silicon industry; working for the medical industry tangentially; working on classified programs for the government or pissing away resources at CERN circle jerking nonsense and spitting out propaganda. Normal people generally don't care or think the government already has anti gravity and the rest are standard model physicists justifying their degree by chanting "It's impossible because standard model says so." It's all pretty funny.
I think they're pushing the narrative the cyber truck bomber said something about anti gravity as well.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:05:42 UTC No. 16535716
I thought this spammer got banned?
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:06:18 UTC No. 16535717
>>16535702
no, there's just a big mental health crisis and a lot of people acting like schizophrenics.
considering how angry you get at the use of the word i assume you're one of them?
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:07:20 UTC No. 16535718
>>16535709
>gravimeme schizo is actually back
lol, i guess he didn't blow up the cybertruck after all
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:10:07 UTC No. 16535720
The schizobomber said the government has "Gravatic" tech, not "Gravitic". Completely different
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:10:52 UTC No. 16535721
>>16535717
>>16535718
>Were not cultists
>were not mad REEE
priceless
Tell me more about your church of Einstein--do you worship physics books?
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:11:27 UTC No. 16535723
wait isn't this the mentally unstable guy that had an emotional meltdown about "the cult of einstein" not too long ago?
they really need to force these people to take their medication, he's in his manic phase again.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:12:38 UTC No. 16535725
>>16535717
>I'm the normal one
Whew lass
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:13:16 UTC No. 16535726
>>16535721
you write like a methed-out hobo, calm down for your own safety please, you're gonna have a melty again.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:13:39 UTC No. 16535727
>>16535723
what's your discord?
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:13:55 UTC No. 16535729
Let's be very honest again, we don't have a commercially available heavy lift vehicle. Falcon 9 Heavy may someday come about. It's on the drawing board right now. SLS is real. You've seen it down at Michoud. We're building the core stage. We have all the engines done, ready to be put on the test stand at Stennis... I don't see any hardware for a Falcon 9 Heavy, except that he's going to take three Falcon 9s and put them together and that becomes the Heavy. It's not that easy in rocketry.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:14:38 UTC No. 16535730
>>16535725
you basically just proved me right by coming out as the schizo from a few days ago. so, uh... yeah, i guess. i'm pretty normal, you're clearly very unstable.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:14:40 UTC No. 16535731
>>16535726
you write like a pubescent teen
It's adorable
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:14:50 UTC No. 16535732
>>16535729
I love this copypasta so much
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:15:36 UTC No. 16535734
>>16535732
it’s so versatile
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:16:02 UTC No. 16535735
>>16535731
schizo-anon, you're not succeeding at trying to sound less upset, it bleeds right through every post you make, just take a breather and don't throw away your entire day by getting bullied on an internet forum, this is bad for your health.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:16:37 UTC No. 16535736
>>16535730
Seriously, I'm guessing you're in highschool? You cant be more than 15 with your level of intelligence and total lack of originality.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:17:44 UTC No. 16535737
>>16535735
Upset about what? Laughing at your cult and watching you get mad about it.. lol.
Tell me more about Einstein and Standard model--your arguments from ignorance are so adorable.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:18:05 UTC No. 16535738
>>16535736
>sidesteps reality
>you're upset because you recognized me
you're not very difficult to miss with your extremely unhinged writing style, how are you going to explain how unbothered and not-mad you are this time around?
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:20:24 UTC No. 16535740
>>16535738
I asked about your religion lad. Tell me more about Standard Model and Dark matter and how dark energy is real. I need you to say the line about gravity research--that's my favorite.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:21:20 UTC No. 16535741
>>16535740
>he's already fuming this much
it's so easy too, schizo's literally have zero impulse control.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:22:14 UTC No. 16535742
>>16535606
Speed dimples
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:22:40 UTC No. 16535743
>>16535741
Indeed.
Right, tell me the line about anti gravity being impossible according to standard model. Go on--say the line.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:22:54 UTC No. 16535744
did the schizo seriously jump in to defend his honor because someone accused him of being the cybertruck bomber?
wew lad.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:23:38 UTC No. 16535745
>>16535740
>Tell me more about Standard Model and Dark matter and how dark energy is real
they aren't
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:23:56 UTC No. 16535746
>>16535743
i'm pretty sure you argued yourself into the dirt and lost, last time, and then went around in circles acting out against a bunch of fictional characters you created in your head.
please anon, just, get some help.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:25:03 UTC No. 16535749
>>16535744
>I can't make a post without Schizo
LOL
You have the vocabulary of a toddler.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:25:17 UTC No. 16535750
>>16535172
Only if you're starting from Earth. The Moon itself can be an absolutely unstoppable industrial powerhouse home to tens of billions and if I have my way it'll make the Earth politically and economically irrelevant.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:26:20 UTC No. 16535751
>>16535746
Argued what? I just made fun of Einstein while you all made asses of yourselves saying nothing and I laughed my ass off. You really do all sound like repetitive reddlt vomit.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:29:59 UTC No. 16535753
>>16535751
>i-i didn't argue
>i-i'm laughing s-so hard
yeah, i remember this, this guy spent pretty much an entire afternoon claiming to have proof of instant quantum communication and when pressed he posted a few popsci tabloid articles that invalidated his own arguments
he continued to try and find someone to argue with for hours after that while people mocked and made jokes at his expense.
he might have hallucinated a different version of events to protect his ego.
>>16535749
>he's this angry at the word schizophrenic
did he get diagnosed with it? is that why it makes him act out like this?
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:32:06 UTC No. 16535754
>>16535060
>anti gravity tech
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:38:10 UTC No. 16535758
>>16535754
Blimps are clearly the work of the einstein cult, they give false deniability to the real anti gravity engines they're testing.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:38:55 UTC No. 16535759
>>16535617
that's a piece of a crane or something, not a rocket
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:39:12 UTC No. 16535760
>>16535753
Tell me more about your Cult of Einstein.
Say the line about anti gravity being impossible because standard model says so--go on: you know you want to.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:40:19 UTC No. 16535761
>>16535760
the cult of einstein uses blimps to fool you into thinking anti gravity sightings can be explained away. look schizo anon! >>16535754
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:40:43 UTC No. 16535762
>>16535758
>I'm not in a Cult
>Anti gravity is impossible because my cult says so though
You're so adorable.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:41:16 UTC No. 16535763
>>16535711
Minmus mining is a good party trick and a good way to learn how to do interplanetary transfers when you deliver fuel to LMuO
I'm glad I set up my Minmus mining station, but I definitely do not use it
it just takes too much brain power and real time to deliver fuel to anywhere useful
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:41:54 UTC No. 16535764
>>16535761
>I have the vocabulary of a toddler and talk like a reddlter
You keep proving me right every time.
I love that I went back and read that old thread and most of your nonsense was pruned and almost all my posts are still up: Priceless.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:41:59 UTC No. 16535765
>>16535762
schizoanon, what nefarious plans do they have for that blimp? i bet einstein is in there right now, planning to fool clever alternative thinkers like us.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:42:30 UTC No. 16535766
I'd like to imagine these two anons are actually the same person arguing to himself.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:42:59 UTC No. 16535767
stop replying to it, faggots
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:45:23 UTC No. 16535772
>>16535766
you should go back to the archive and check it out, it's not every day you get a real schizophrenic on /sfg/. usually most of the conspiracy type stuff is just trolling but this guy stayed and desperately fought for his schizo beliefs for hours on end.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:47:06 UTC No. 16535773
>>16535763
>>16535711
actually what sort of rocket do you need to use to get a vehicle all the way out to Jool anyway, I'd like to see what you've got, I need ideas
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:47:20 UTC No. 16535774
>>16535772
he's about to do it again, too.
schizoanon is already in his
>i'm totally not upset but i'm going to try every insult in the book to try get you to stop bullying me
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:50:08 UTC No. 16535777
>>16535772
how many times do you think he's going to bring up einstein this time?
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:51:19 UTC No. 16535780
>>16535773
Old pic of an old design, but basically enough nuclear engines with enough fuel will get you anywhere.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:54:07 UTC No. 16535783
>>16535716
>>16535720
>>16535723
>>16535744
>>16535767
threadly reminder that the US government denied the existence of gravimetry for decades before Tom Clancey wrote about it in his book, and for most people disclosure happened incidentally and near imperceptably as a result of a throwaway line referencing gravimeters in the film "Hunt for Red October"
this is because that tech played a critical role in the US nuclear Triad, namely sensors for nuclear submarines, for many years
you are all the lowest form of scum and villainy, return to your discord hive
you will NEVER comprehend geodesy
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:54:17 UTC No. 16535784
>>16535780
not realistic enough
put a giant silly straw between the crew compartments and the engines.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:55:18 UTC No. 16535786
gravimeasure this dick
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:55:24 UTC No. 16535787
>>16535780
you really did just throw nuclear engines at the problem, huh
my issue is that I'm using a reusable TSTO VTHL double spaceplane for all my upmass
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:56:50 UTC No. 16535790
Guys, stop all this space nonsense. We have to talk about the rape gangs right now
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 02:59:35 UTC No. 16535793
>>16535790
stop trying to distract from the gravimetrics you fucking einstein worshipping pedophile.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:02:00 UTC No. 16535795
Pay no attention to the gravisthetics schizo. He is off his meds
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:02:31 UTC No. 16535796
>>16535783
my weight scale is a gravimeter and it's telling me i'm fat :(
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:03:53 UTC No. 16535797
>>16535796
the easiest way to lose weight is to go to space
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:04:05 UTC No. 16535798
>>16535796
too much gravy, you will never go to space eating like this.
>>16535795
you can't use that word, he's gonna explode again.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:04:34 UTC No. 16535799
>>16535729
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4pt
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:06:31 UTC No. 16535801
>>16535799
a true classic. absolutes kinomatografie
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:10:00 UTC No. 16535803
>>16535801
it's not really kino. maybo clippo
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:10:43 UTC No. 16535804
did the schizo calm down? i want to talk about uranium reserves.
how long could we actually sustain mass use of nuclear torches? since we can't exactly re-use that material in breeder reactors once it's been launched out of the torch, don't you think it would be a really bad long term option if we don't find better sources of nuclear fuel offworld?
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:13:21 UTC No. 16535805
>>16535745
>>16535740
Dark Energy may not be real. But, it's not in an exciting way, but a way that Relativity is adequate to account for. Time runs faster without gravity wells, and for light passing through cosmic voids, enough time passes more quickly that regular cosmic expansion looks like it's accelerating to viewers on the other side. Dark Energy can potentially be explained away this way, but it doesn't add any new exotic phenomena in the process.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:13:43 UTC No. 16535806
>>16535765
>>16535804
You're all so adorable. You're like children who learned a new swear word and chant it over and over.
More leddit vomit please. I love it when idiots pretend to be smart.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:15:37 UTC No. 16535807
>>16535805
I'm still waiting for standard model physicists to admit their solar model is wrong. Breaking Gas laws to fit the model is laughable. These are the same people pretending to be experts on cosmology.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:16:47 UTC No. 16535810
>>16535807
Broken in what way, and for what solar model?
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:17:24 UTC No. 16535811
>>16535795
>>16535798
>Talk bad about Einstein
>The cult goes on the attack
I love how telling the truth makes you all so mad.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:20:01 UTC No. 16535812
>>16535783
>gravimetry
literally just accelerometers, nobody was "gatekeeping" the study of gravity using accelerometers lol.
>>16535806
oh he's just hungry for attention nvm
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:20:39 UTC No. 16535813
>>16535810
https://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu
Heat Capacity to negative. Laughable.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:21:14 UTC No. 16535814
>16535811
>everyone is mad but me pt2
schizo-anon is really gonna do this again, isn't he?
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:21:42 UTC No. 16535815
>>16535812
I'm sorry, did you have an actual question? I just saw leddit vomit devoid of any actual insight on the other uses of Uranium or Plutonium.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:22:22 UTC No. 16535816
Any updates on the bomb threat?
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:23:21 UTC No. 16535817
>>16535813
1992? This is pretty worthless as it is. Solar formation models from this time are known to be completely wrong because our solar system is not a common solar system.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:23:26 UTC No. 16535818
>>16535816
ask the gravity schizo ITT, he's probably the one who sent it.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:23:36 UTC No. 16535820
>>16535815
no, i get it, you need negative attention, you lack other ways of getting what your brain needs, so you try to extract it on internet forums.
it's a little sad, but i get it.
have a nice day.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:23:39 UTC No. 16535821
>>16535812
>>16535814
I love it when redditers pretend to be actual scientists then get mad when people mock standard model as if they understand it at all.
adorable.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:23:48 UTC No. 16535822
>>16535816
I tipped off the FBI that someone in this thread did it.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:24:40 UTC No. 16535823
>>16535820
>Still crying because I said mean things about Einstein>>16535817
Your bant is pretty sad and it's obvious you're really mad at me for insulting your cult. It's so cute.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:25:04 UTC No. 16535824
>>16535816
the bomb is still threatening.
>>16535818
the fireworks were probably his attempt at an "alternative" non-standard model bomb
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:25:31 UTC No. 16535825
>>16535824
kek
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:25:41 UTC No. 16535826
>>16535817
>1992
It hasn't changed retard.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:26:46 UTC No. 16535827
>>16535825
>>16535824
>>16535822
>Welcome to reddlt
>were so smart
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:27:12 UTC No. 16535828
>were
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:28:01 UTC No. 16535830
>>16535823
Wasn't disagreeing with you here. >>16535817
>>16535826
The what am I looking for? What am I looking /at/? I skimmed a bit of this and I didn't catch values that were implied to be negative. So, for the sake of a random internet retard that does not, in fact, know the ideal gas laws or how to use them, what's the significance?
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:31:20 UTC No. 16535835
>i love it when
>they're so mad when
>laughable
>i love how
>more please
>you're all so adorable
>i love that
>say the line
this is what iron deficiency looks like, this particular anon needs to chew on some tablets because he is trying way to hard to overcompensate for his emotional investment in the subject.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:33:21 UTC No. 16535836
>>16535835
you think she's on her period?
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:33:25 UTC No. 16535837
>>16535787
>reusable TSTO VTHL
I've done something like that I think, just stick the spaceplane on a big rocket and get it most of the way to LKO before staging. I can't get anything useful stuff up in spaceplanes though, for really big payloads I rely on fuckhuge SRBs to launch a common nuclear tug that can head straight out to Jool with whatever I'm sending.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:33:54 UTC No. 16535838
>>16535459
Yes, but unfortunately natural language doesn't work like that. There are self-propelled barges.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:34:13 UTC No. 16535839
>>16535836
certainly has the speech pattern of a passive aggressive woman in her 20's maybe we should send him some chocolate?
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:36:37 UTC No. 16535841
>>16535835
wait a second, these are all the ways that a female activist starts a post.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:38:03 UTC No. 16535843
>>16535830
>I don't know what I'm looking at
Yes, you're some random retard that doesn't know the gas laws or how to spot them in a system of equations.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:38:05 UTC No. 16535844
>>16535633
kek
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:39:04 UTC No. 16535846
>>16535835
>>16535836
>>16535839
>>16535841
>>16535844
>We did it reddlt!
adorable
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:41:23 UTC No. 16535850
>>16535846
why'd you reply to 16535844?
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:42:14 UTC No. 16535852
the crews of nuclear submarines are liabilities
we should replace them all with automated systems and AI LLMs so that way there is no risk of failure
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:43:44 UTC No. 16535854
>>16535850
he's a little flustered and on his period, so i think he misfired.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:43:45 UTC No. 16535855
>>16535837
what if the big rocket is ALSO a spaceplane though
what then, motherfucker
yeah, it's basically impossible to launch anything with mining drills in a Mk3 fairing
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:44:28 UTC No. 16535856
>>16535843
Okay, so there's no good faith argument being made whatsoever on your end. Got it.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:45:20 UTC No. 16535857
The epitome of Earth humor are Uranus jokes.
Let that sink in.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:45:38 UTC No. 16535858
>>16535856
he's gonna continue to argue with you now, you have no choice in the matter.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:46:52 UTC No. 16535862
>>16535773
Orbital construction + drop tanks
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:49:29 UTC No. 16535865
>>16535853
I would live in one of these, alone.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:49:29 UTC No. 16535866
>>16535824
wew
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:51:29 UTC No. 16535868
>>16535865
same
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:51:40 UTC No. 16535869
>>16535812
someone is mad that it's common knowledge advanced gravimeters of the kind commonly used in survey work today were classified technology until they were disclosed to the public through a multi-madia hollywood production
"Twentieth century technology thus addressed many of the shortfalls the 19th century torsion balance. Bell created a sensitive gradiometer that was easy to use and could work from a moving vehicle. This technology remained classified, however, until the end of the Cold War because of the important role it played in America’s nuclear deterrent."
"Post-Cold War relaxation of some security restrictions in the 1990’s brought the Navy technology to the attention of oil geologists. The military advancements in gravity gradient measurement technology made the gravity gradiometer attractive again for use in the search for oil almost 100 years after Eotvos developed his first torsion balance."
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:53:37 UTC No. 16535871
>>16535853
Whats up with russia's backwards progess in spaceflight? these things look roomier than mir or the russian half of ISS
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:57:05 UTC No. 16535872
>>16535871
Mir and the ISS were both built around surplus Salyut modules. the Mir Core Module and the ISS's Zvezda modules were both Salyut modules originally.
The reason they don't look like they do in the illustrations is because they inevitably get packed with all kinds of supplies, equipment, etc.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 03:58:52 UTC No. 16535874
>>16535871
I assure that the usable pressurized volume of those Salyut stations are not even one third of what is depicted in those images. Apart from looking way bigger than it actually is, the dozens of cables, and cargo compartments laying around, only leave you with enough space to barely even being in a standing position. Add to that the moldy smell, and you get the real Soviet experience. Starship will finally end the cuckpod(tm) fetish that both Russians and Americans love so much.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 04:01:06 UTC No. 16535876
>>16535874
Just wait, they're going to pack starships to the gills too. Give mission planners more space and they'll find more ways to waste it.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 04:01:31 UTC No. 16535877
>>16535869
and?
also why did you disprove your first sentence in your own post? that particular design was declassified by the US when it was deemed no longer tactically important, people already knew about gravimeters regardless.
my guess is your point is that the US has classified things in the past therefore all of my schizo fantasies are actually real and just hidden somewhere?
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 04:03:11 UTC No. 16535880
>>16535869
>advanced sensors were classified due to their military applications..... therefore antigravity schizo shit
diseased thought process.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 04:06:19 UTC No. 16535886
>>16535869
>inb4 angry, passive-aggressive response calling everyone but him a redditor
you gonna tell me i fell off next? with your obnoxiously fake smug attitude?
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 04:14:19 UTC No. 16535898
>>16535884
space slave
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 04:26:31 UTC No. 16535912
Sometimes I get the desire to build a space suit just for fun
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 04:32:57 UTC No. 16535915
>>16535855
>what if the big rocket is ALSO a spaceplane though
Lemme see
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 04:33:29 UTC No. 16535916
>>16535912
perhaps you could also join the grift
just 10 more years
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 04:49:26 UTC No. 16535921
>>16535916
Why didn't she make it work?
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 05:10:25 UTC No. 16535926
>>16535921
that was never the idea
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 05:40:01 UTC No. 16535940
>schizo and anti-schizo stop talking
>/sfg/ dies
hmmm
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 05:48:30 UTC No. 16535947
>>16535940
I started playing KSP, sorry
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 05:49:54 UTC No. 16535950
hermaphrodite segs
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 05:51:36 UTC No. 16535952
>>16535947
doing a Duna mission? I always find myself getting bored and dropping the game whenever I reach that planet, where my adhd ass would spend >90% of the time just building the spacecraft.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 05:56:31 UTC No. 16535957
>>16535952
Picking up on my old save and seeing what there is to do, I left lots of stuff on the alarm clock schedule, various things going various places. In 250ish days I can send pic related back to Jool with another 40 cryogenically frozen Kerbal colonists on board, bound for Laythe. Last time I played I was in the middle of an attempt to get a small base of 15+ Kerbals on each island there to really call it "colonized" but I didn't do them all yet.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 06:01:20 UTC No. 16535961
>>16535957
That's some cool dedication. A mission to Jool would take me forever. Having only a laptop doesn't help, seeing those struts makes my pc sweat already lol
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 06:08:35 UTC No. 16535966
>>16535961
I have around 130 craft in flight currently across the whole game and my PC room gets noticeably warmer when I play KSP, no other game I throw at this computer does that. For years I played on a more limited machine, upgrading was necessary to finally play like I want, with tons of mods and a prettier solar system. Now I've got crew in stasis on 20+ year trips to the outer planets, Sarnus and the others from the Outer Planets mod. While they drift, I fuck around on Laythe.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 06:17:22 UTC No. 16535968
>>16535966
Any specs for your pc? Ngl, the only reason I would get a desktop is to play some heavily-modded KSP in 4k. Talking about mainly RSS, and lots visual enhancers. Even if it is to just "simulate" a routine mission to LEO, like some youtubers do, where if you didn't know about KSP you'd think it's either real of some expensive hollywood CGI.
>130 craft in flight
that's insane
>no other game I throw at this computer does that.
unfortunately, calculating all trajectories and physical properties, collisions, etc of all the little parts does that. well, the spaghetti code doesn't help, either.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 06:38:36 UTC No. 16535973
>>16535968
>AMD FX-8320 Eight-Core Processor 3.50 GHz
>AMD Radeon R9 200 series
>32GB RAM
I bought it off my friend when he upgraded to his new PC a couple years ago, it does what I need it to do and then some.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 06:39:37 UTC No. 16535975
>>16535852
1983 called and wants its movie plot back.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 07:05:36 UTC No. 16535986
>>16535835
I never assume a poster is a woman but you might be right
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 07:37:05 UTC No. 16535994
>>16535975
there are people in this very thread who unironically believe that would be a good idea, if the last one is anything to go by
that's how critically retarded this general truly is
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 07:46:11 UTC No. 16535996
>>16535915
I don't WANT to fire up KSP though
okay, I'm working on a crewed Duna lander right now (my existing Duna rover blew a tire and if I'm going out again I might as well go hard with crew)
>>16535957
hell yeah okay let's get POSTING
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 07:51:06 UTC No. 16535998
>>16535957
my prototype Duna lander
I've cheated it into orbit and it was able to land just fine
It has enough dv to presumably do some Ike work when I need it to
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 09:29:18 UTC No. 16536020
>>16535973
>FX-8320
No matter what you paid, you got ripped.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 09:56:16 UTC No. 16536033
>>16535805
The fact that gravity is created by mass slowing time is still not widely known by normies.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 10:08:11 UTC No. 16536038
>>16535033
i just woke up!! i am sso excited to watch the first new glenn launch today!
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 10:27:07 UTC No. 16536051
>>16535706
Why are elevens like that?
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 10:29:14 UTC No. 16536054
>>16536038
anon, I...
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 10:31:03 UTC No. 16536055
>>16535706
didn't xe private xer xitter or xatever?
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 10:31:53 UTC No. 16536056
>>16536055
deleted
undeleted, and privated and removed all of her followers
I think it's actually a girl
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 10:39:04 UTC No. 16536059
>>16536056
>a real girl on the internet
>japanese
>interested in rockets
>interested in yuri
>can draw
>trans flag
yeah, No. It just doesn't add up. I will believe it when I see it (her coochie)
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 10:39:21 UTC No. 16536060
>>16536033
>The fact that gravity is created by mass slowing time
This still isn't a confirmed fact.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 11:35:35 UTC No. 16536074
>>16535036
Henlo
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 11:49:43 UTC No. 16536087
>>16536074
This is so far from earth
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 12:04:51 UTC No. 16536096
New Glenn's delayed again. At this rate Starship Flight 7 might actually happen first.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 12:14:32 UTC No. 16536098
>>16535863
Yes
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 12:23:47 UTC No. 16536100
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 12:50:05 UTC No. 16536113
Is new glenn delayed? I didnt find any announcements about it
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 13:00:00 UTC No. 16536119
>>16536113
It got moved to Wednesday.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 13:22:56 UTC No. 16536135
>>16536130
Heh
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 13:31:48 UTC No. 16536145
>>16535952
building the spacecraft is the best bit in ksp, especially if you're like me and install way too many mods so the actually gameplay is janky as shit.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 13:32:50 UTC No. 16536147
>>16536059
ready for my cock
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 14:34:00 UTC No. 16536178
>>16536162
lesbians don't exist, lesbimetry is irrelevant, anti-cock drives will never exist and "lesbians" will lose to the cock every time.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 14:35:42 UTC No. 16536181
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 14:48:33 UTC No. 16536186
>>16536178
didn't you read the newest study? yuri is actually the time dilation between galaxy clusters. And if you still don't believe me, just take a look at Cern, they created many lesbatoms in their particle accelerator. I'm sorry your oldspace mind can't grasp it, but the future will be built with Dyke-matter drives.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 14:53:00 UTC No. 16536188
This is getting boring. When are we getting weekly Starship flights? It's too slow. I have nothing going on in my life.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 14:56:22 UTC No. 16536193
>>16536188
Weekly Starship flights will get boring too.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 15:02:47 UTC No. 16536195
>Recover the SLS core stage with LOFTID inflatable aeroshell and parachutes
>Recover the SRBs with Draco or RS-88 thrusters (or some non-toxic alternative) and parachutes
>ACES tech on the EUS
I just made the SLS viable
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 15:22:17 UTC No. 16536209
>>16536195
Were it so easy.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 15:32:54 UTC No. 16536215
>>16536195
>>16536209
oh and for the amount of money Ares/SLS had for dev we should've had this already
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 15:41:02 UTC No. 16536218
Jeff!! Do the fucking needful already
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 15:56:09 UTC No. 16536224
>>16535464
>145 from US
>140 of them are just SpaceX with Falcon and Starship
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 16:08:30 UTC No. 16536231
>>16535464
>210 from US
>200 of them are just SpaceX with Falcon and Starship
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 16:09:47 UTC No. 16536232
>>16536020
I got a working computer that runs good and plays the game I want, you negative nancy cunt.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 16:26:23 UTC No. 16536242
>>16535522
anyone remember how depressed we were in the mid-2000s, when it felt like nothing would ever trend us up again? SpaceX really changed everything by pushing through their early failures.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 16:30:15 UTC No. 16536243
>>16536242
the only reason /sfg/ even came into existence is because there was finally more than 1 major event per year to talk about.
space has never been so interesting.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 16:30:39 UTC No. 16536244
>>16536236
This is pretty good, I voted 11-15 but I feel like it's going to be either that (14-ish) or 8, the other top option, with not really much chance for the in-between. Depends on whether they start reusing the booster.
Also did we do this last year as well so we could see how it went? I do my own personal predictions for a bunch of stuff that I can compare to but I don't think there was much in here.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 16:31:37 UTC No. 16536246
>>16536242
I was hyped for Constellation, once upon a time, simply because it was SOMETHING happening.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 16:36:44 UTC No. 16536251
>>16536002
>>16536000
>>16535996
Better Shuttle? It looks unmanned so it's already safer. Also I underestimated how many flights I've got going.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 16:42:11 UTC No. 16536254
>>16536244
I did not make a poll last year, if there was one I don't have it.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 16:44:47 UTC No. 16536257
>>16536246
>>16536243
>>16536242
i remember having an interest in spaceflight as a kid and learning about it's history, reading books with those classic beautiful illustrations of satellites that had been launched and future concepts.
then when nothing happened for a long time except the ISS being finished and the occasional mars rover, i lost interest.
really only found this place in 2019 when spacex started kicking it up a notch.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 17:11:09 UTC No. 16536277
>>16536243
>space has never been so interesting.
In our lifetimes you mean? Surely the sixties were more thrilling.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 17:26:30 UTC No. 16536291
>>16536277
fair enough
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 17:28:33 UTC No. 16536295
>>16536195
The problem is then you would still have an SLS.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 17:31:37 UTC No. 16536298
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/75463
i present to you, a prokaryotic thread from 10 years ago, the beginnings of what /SFG/ would become.
this was just a few months before orbcomm and the first falcon 9 booster landing.
feel free to peruse the archive with me and find more gems like this.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 17:33:06 UTC No. 16536299
>>16536298
>EM drive was a thing 10 years ago
grim
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 17:37:14 UTC No. 16536303
>>16536302
I could talk about the moon landings until I die and never get bored
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 17:38:15 UTC No. 16536306
>>16536299
schizodrive anons the world over got cucked even in the very first thread.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 17:40:04 UTC No. 16536309
>>16536302
Since then, the cost, capacity, and launch rate for spaceflight has been revolutionized like never before, and the hardware for actually doing manned interplanetary missions is being built. The first thread of /sfg/ had no inkling of the era we're living in now.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 17:40:14 UTC No. 16536310
>>16536298
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/77326
the launch thread for orbcomm
truly launch threads are so pure that nothing has changed in the intervening decade.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 17:48:36 UTC No. 16536316
>>16536310
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/77326
this nigga predicted point to point
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 17:49:29 UTC No. 16536317
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 17:50:29 UTC No. 16536319
>>16536310
>>7736592
>So basically you can launch satellites more cheaply? How is that going to change anything? We already have thousands of those things up there right? Just seems like american patriotism to hype up nothing much at all.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 17:52:16 UTC No. 16536321
>>16536319
>a massive waste of tax payer money only outdone by the threat it poses to the environment
not the own you think it is...
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 17:53:33 UTC No. 16536322
>>16536321
It's not tax payer dollars and environmentalists are liars who invent endangered species to stop development because they hate human progress.
>Muh money and muh environment
It's not the own you think it is.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 18:12:40 UTC No. 16536335
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 18:14:21 UTC No. 16536338
>>16536335
10 years later and blue origin is finally actually literally launching
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 18:15:28 UTC No. 16536339
>>16536299
>EM drive
a blast from the past indeed
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 18:30:50 UTC No. 16536351
/SFG/ is DEAD
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 18:33:06 UTC No. 16536356
I like to pretend my flask is a Super Heavy Booster and my hand is the catch tower.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 18:36:55 UTC No. 16536359
>>16536356
>spacex engineers are fucking drunkards
it's over for felon
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 18:38:25 UTC No. 16536361
>>16536359
My tea flask retard
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 18:38:46 UTC No. 16536362
/sfg/ wasnt a thing in 2015
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 18:38:50 UTC No. 16536363
>>16535060
It goes in cycles. Some event happens that gets normal people talking about it than an army of midwits physicists come out of the woodwork to chant their religion.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 18:41:10 UTC No. 16536364
>>16536356
i had a recent dream that i was at work and a fuming, smoking starliner was coming down on two parachutes in a field next to me. i quickly warned my co-workers and people in the area to GTFO because the smoke from hypergolic propellants and highly toxic, and to not go downwind of the landing site. saving hundreds of people in the process and giving an interview to reporters later where i complain that this was not surprising given starliner's history and the fact that it's a barely functional piece of trash.
that never happened, but i dreamt about it.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 18:42:10 UTC No. 16536365
>>16536362
nobody said it was.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 18:42:49 UTC No. 16536368
>>16536361
>spacex engineers are fucking tea-fags
it's over for husk
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 18:43:11 UTC No. 16536369
>>16536365
Yeah, you pretty much did
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 18:43:54 UTC No. 16536370
>>16536364
>that never happened
only because of brave men and manchildren like yourself. Thank you for your service!
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 18:45:51 UTC No. 16536373
https://youtu.be/awN2w3sGj1w
Hydrofags BTFO again
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 18:47:58 UTC No. 16536374
>>16536369
i didn't
i said it was a prokaryote
one of the first threads that tried to consolidate spaceflight discussion, and not too long before spacex did the impossible with falcon 9
it's just a nice little piece of history.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 18:49:52 UTC No. 16536377
>>16535877
What is a schitzo fantasy?
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 18:53:02 UTC No. 16536380
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 18:55:45 UTC No. 16536382
>>16535940
I think schitzo posters are bots desu. I don't really see them making coherent arguments. I don't know any normal sane person who would say the government doesn't spend billions on black projects.
The DOE budget had internal confined fusion under weapons grade classification up until 2020 and the ignition system is still listed as classified weapons tech.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 18:59:47 UTC No. 16536388
>>16536374
It was expensive
Not impossible
They just threw more money at it than anyone else
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 19:07:57 UTC No. 16536395
>>16536309
Rockets are the wooden sail boats of our era. No, the hardware for manned interplanetary missions isn't being built. You're delusional if you think Elon will get humans to Mars with H1Bs and chemical propulsion.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 19:10:05 UTC No. 16536401
brilliant pebbles
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 19:10:25 UTC No. 16536402
>>16536395
Elon is God, and God can do anything
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 19:11:03 UTC No. 16536405
>>16536395
>You're delusional
Last time you said that we got two static fires in one day.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 19:12:40 UTC No. 16536407
>>16536298
>Wants to talk about space flight
>Doesn't want to discuss FTL
Engineers are educated idiots.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 19:14:49 UTC No. 16536410
wtf is elon gaining from boosting this grooming controversy every few minutes? the UK is a total nonfactor in the big picture. we have a launch in 5 days. i miss the times he would answer rocket questions and give cool hardware details. He's turning into Zubrin, eventually Elon's senility will have him tweeting about a single subject 24/7, like Zubrin does with Ukraine. Howard Hughes arc
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 19:20:54 UTC No. 16536416
>>16536410
The better question is why are you bothering with Twatter at all. It's literally Facebook for zoomers.
Musk took the spot of Rocketdyne by offering a cheaper service--dude doesn't know shit about science.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 19:22:14 UTC No. 16536419
>>16536410
He's trying to win back street cred with /pol/, like Sam Hyde suggested. Not even joking, that's obviously his angle.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 19:22:24 UTC No. 16536420
>>16536410
he's currently retweeting grok images supporting his priors. also posted an anti elon tweet before that https://x.com/robert_zubrin/status/
how can someone who made it his whole life effort to be pro Mars throw it all away to focus on slav wars? i dont want to get old bros
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 19:24:11 UTC No. 16536422
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 19:25:36 UTC No. 16536425
>>16536420
Thank God that war is going to end soon.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 19:25:48 UTC No. 16536426
>>16536419
Like his apology tour in Israel after antisemitism got boosted on X. complete with a necklace that he would never remove until every last hostage is released
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 19:26:03 UTC No. 16536427
>>16536410
its just american right wing schizo nonsense
America is filled with grooming victims but they call them "coal burners" and hope they die
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 19:26:13 UTC No. 16536428
>>16536377
*schizo
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 19:27:21 UTC No. 16536432
>>16536425
Back to your containment thread zigger
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 19:28:13 UTC No. 16536434
>>16536432
>zigger
I am a Pole living in Poland (Germany).
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 19:29:16 UTC No. 16536435
>>16536419
>>16536426
he's fucking shameless lmao. by innaguration day I'd bet he's completely forgotten about DOGE and has moved on to his next pet project/flavor of the month controversy
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 19:30:04 UTC No. 16536437
>>16536425
it really isn't.
ending the war in it's current state basically just teaches snowgerians that they can try this again in 10 years.
apparently nobody's learned that there is no reasoning with this deathcult and they need to have a proper collapse if they want to reform into something better.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 19:30:25 UTC No. 16536438
>>16536432
This you?
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 19:32:07 UTC No. 16536441
>>16536033
Mass slowing time has been wildly known by normies since interstellar came out a decade ago. There is no link to frame transition and gravity. If you do have a physics degree you should ask for a refund immediately.
>>16535805
>Can potentially be explained
>Just 2 more decades
Standard Model will never be able to unify special and general relativity. Bag Model is laughably inadequate.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 19:33:28 UTC No. 16536445
>>16536428
The pseudoscience of psychology isn't something I spend time on. What is a schizo fantasy anon? I'm genuinely curious.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 19:34:39 UTC No. 16536446
>>16536441
>>16536445
oh hey look the schizophrenic is back, and with a VENGEANCE.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 19:34:42 UTC No. 16536447
>>16536437
Let them, the weak should fear the strong. Wars of conquest are based and I don't care about Ukraine or Europe. Russia would make better use of Europe than Europeans
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 19:35:36 UTC No. 16536449
>>16536447
So you wouldn't mind being ruled by Chinese?
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 19:35:47 UTC No. 16536450
>>16536447
>russia
>one of the most corrupt shitholes on the planet
>would make better use
you're a captured useful idiot, have you ever actually been to russia?
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 19:37:03 UTC No. 16536451
j28m>>16536441
Right handed neutrinos
Stochastic gravity
Cosmological constant
Done
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 19:38:29 UTC No. 16536453
>>16536441
i don't use a standard model, i use a model S
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 19:38:53 UTC No. 16536454
>>16536447
>Russia would make better use of Europe than Europeans
Cold war times proves you wrong
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 19:39:37 UTC No. 16536456
>>16536447
>Russia would make better use of Europe than Europeans
Did you somehow forget about the WW2 and the Cold War? Eastern Europe is a shithole due to 5 decades of Soviet occupation.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 19:40:20 UTC No. 16536458
>>16536447
China could make much better use of Russia than the Russians do.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 19:44:06 UTC No. 16536460
>>16536450
America, Europe, China, all uncorrupted bastions of liberty. Fucking retard
>>16536449
I wouldnt mind if they took their shitty islands back
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 19:44:31 UTC No. 16536462
>>16536456
And now Western Europe is a shithole due to 5 decades of American influence.
Maybe the real lesson here is that Europe is destined to be a shithole.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 19:47:50 UTC No. 16536465
>>16536462
>I live in a malfunctioning society filled to the brim with niggers
>but at least I don't live in this other malfunctioning society filled to the brim with niggers
>t-take that!!!!!
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 19:48:53 UTC No. 16536468
>>16536460
>w-well western countries have problems too
no shit, we talk about them here all the time, and the only reason we can even do that is because they're significantly better than absolute near third-world shitholes like russia.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 19:52:01 UTC No. 16536471
>>16536462
that's a pretty lame attempt at equivalency, western europe is significantly better off in just about every single way.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 19:55:16 UTC No. 16536476
>>16536471
Comparisons between Western and Eastern Europe are (or were) very close to Europa vs America. In one place you earn much more, but the other one has safe, high-trust society, no gang wars and urban fauna ruining cities.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 20:01:54 UTC No. 16536480
>>16536476
>safe, high-trust society, no gang wars
which eastern europe is that lmao
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 20:09:39 UTC No. 16536484
>>16536480
This area.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 20:12:38 UTC No. 16536487
>>16536410
he is trying to get alternative parties elected in europe that are against mass immigration and generally unfucking the countries
Reform UK in the UK, AfD in Germany
there is also the issue of EU bureucrats fucking with him and his companies (especially X and censorship issues) that might have finally sent him over the edge
getting rid of the pointless and actively harmful bureucracy in Europe should help the European economy which would help Tesla in particular there, but generally also affect the world economy and his other companies
Europe becoming stronger economically and militarily subsequently would also mean that US doesn't need to put so much resources into defending it
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 20:13:23 UTC No. 16536488
tldr wen hop?
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 20:18:17 UTC No. 16536491
>>16536458
I agree
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 20:18:43 UTC No. 16536492
>>16536465
You forgot that my shithole goes to space
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 20:18:55 UTC No. 16536493
>>16536488
No idea, ask Chinese.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 20:19:28 UTC No. 16536494
>>16536487
>that are against mass immigration
that are right wing grifters who will increase immigration*
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 20:20:15 UTC No. 16536495
>>16536493
问 hop
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 20:20:32 UTC No. 16536496
>>16536468
Who are you quoting?
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 20:21:23 UTC No. 16536498
>>16536484
also known as central europe
coincidence?
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 20:32:30 UTC No. 16536509
>Space related stuff should only be followed on a monthly/quarterly basis because everything moves so slowly.
Thoughts?
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 20:34:03 UTC No. 16536510
>>16536496
the person i was replying to, that was pretty much the crux of his argument.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 20:34:36 UTC No. 16536511
>>16536492
no I haven't. I left out that part because it would completely btfo me and every european
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 20:40:07 UTC No. 16536514
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 20:43:31 UTC No. 16536519
>>16536516
holy fucking shit, I was just about to post that
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 20:49:57 UTC No. 16536525
25% more prop volume is a funny way of saying 25% less payload volume
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 20:50:34 UTC No. 16536526
adding fuel increases payload
ur fuel limit is determined by stage 1 total thrust
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 20:50:37 UTC No. 16536527
>>16536525
Usable volume is actually the same
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 20:52:52 UTC No. 16536529
>>16536527
according to the ringwatchers article its actually bigger, if you look at number of starlinks
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 21:31:55 UTC No. 16536557
>>16536516
What's a "smart" battery?
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 21:32:38 UTC No. 16536558
>>16536525
But it's taller
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 21:40:56 UTC No. 16536562
>>16536425
not if the j*ws have a say in it, all the dead Ukies (the ones who weren't flown out the day before the borders closed), all the dead russians, and all the money j*ws are making off their MIC stock (which they seem to have invested heavily in right before 9-11) means it's the gift that just keeps on giving for them
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 21:42:45 UTC No. 16536565
>>16536557
The diagram is based on the latest flight 7 press release here: https://www.spacex.com/launches/mis
The "smart battery" language is actually in the original:
>integrated smart batteries and power units that distribute data and 2.7MW of power across the ship to 24 high-voltage actuators
Generally, smart batteries include electronics to manage charging and discharging.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 21:43:39 UTC No. 16536567
>>16536437
>and they need to have a proper collapse if they want to reform into something better.
it's well known that you have their collapse planned, so you can feast off their corpse like you have so many others who wouldn't bow to the tribe
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 21:44:10 UTC No. 16536569
>>16536557
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batte
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 21:52:19 UTC No. 16536577
>>16536516
>>16536519
>H1Bs shilling musk on /sfg/
Who would have thought
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 21:57:26 UTC No. 16536581
>>16536577
the schizo is back
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 22:00:11 UTC No. 16536586
>>16536299
They went with ion drives instead. DARPA is still funding quantized inertia theory as are the Chinese. It isn't dead but the Dunning Krugers get pretty unhinged when you question the cohesion of their antiquated models.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 22:02:19 UTC No. 16536588
>>16536567
they ARE a tribe dummy, they're also controlled by jews.
>have their collapse planned
i'm pretty sure starting a war that locks you out of most of the global economy and then killing off the section of your population that has children and works jobs when you're already suffering from the onset demographic collapse is a great idea when someone is planning your collapse.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 22:05:29 UTC No. 16536589
>>16536557
Something that has been around forever. The Zune had a "smart battery"
It manages charge and discharge to optimize battery efficiency because some types of batteries actually have charge "memory"
Just something else aincent that musk is pretending to be a genius and original for using in his systems
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 22:08:32 UTC No. 16536592
>>16536589
how is claiming to have a smart battery system "pretending to be a genius"? i think you just created a really weak strawman.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 22:08:50 UTC No. 16536593
>>16536493
wen ho pee?
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 22:09:54 UTC No. 16536596
>>16536592
You seem pretty sensitive about people insulting musk, Patel
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 22:11:02 UTC No. 16536598
>>16536577
shut up retard
there's nothing other than SpaceX in spaceflight
you pretending otherwise is evidence of bad faith or actual retardation or both
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 22:13:28 UTC No. 16536599
>>16536596
>I don't like Elon and therefore everything has to be about how I don't like Elon and I am no longer capable of rational thought
Could you just fuck off to somewhere else? You're not adding anything and indulging in your delusions isn't doing you any favors either.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 22:13:44 UTC No. 16536600
>>16536516
Hmm
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 22:13:59 UTC No. 16536601
>>16536596
so if i create a phone and i call it a smartphone, i'm claiming to be some genius merely by calling it that?
you need to try harder pratesh
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 22:15:25 UTC No. 16536602
>>16536598
>Only musk has launch systems
>Only spaseX does space operations
If you insist, Zara
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 22:16:13 UTC No. 16536604
It's called a smart battery because there's additional "intelligence" in the form of the electronics that manage the battery.
It's an existing term and has nothing to do with Elon other than some seething retard in this thread using it as an excuse to get mad about Elon.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 22:17:13 UTC No. 16536606
>>16536602
I do insist. Shut up, retard.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 22:17:32 UTC No. 16536607
>>16536602
they're the only ones with relevancy.
adding an indian name behind every seething post isn't exactly helping your case, you just look like even more of a tourist now, you should get lost.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 22:18:32 UTC No. 16536608
>>16536604
it's a really weird hill to die on, imagine getting angry that a company that builds airliners calls it an airliner, as if calling it that is automatically claiming that you invented the concept.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 22:19:16 UTC No. 16536609
>>16536338
>but muh sub-orbital carnival ride!
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 22:20:02 UTC No. 16536610
>>16536602
fuck off retard
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 22:20:54 UTC No. 16536611
>>16536607
Zara is an Indian name?
I didn't actually know that I was just using Google translate.
Ironic it takes about 7 minutes to finalize the troops to jump to the defense of musk. Interesting.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 22:22:17 UTC No. 16536612
>>16536611
*Mobilize
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 22:22:36 UTC No. 16536613
>>16536481
>this is my hole, it was made for me
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 22:23:06 UTC No. 16536615
>>16536602
>>16536596
>>16536589
EDS is weird man, it causes you to hallucinate a storyline where elon musk personally walks into the boardroom, calls the new battery management system for starship a "smart battery" and very adamantly insists that he invented the term and the concept.
imagine doing all of that, and then getting angry and upset at this fictional event you created on your own head to further reinforce your own derangement.
>>16536611
i just kind of assumed it was because you insisted on calling everyone who made fun of you an indian in every previous post, you should read the above, and do a little self-reflection, none of this ever happened and you're spending energy getting upset about it, get help.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 22:25:43 UTC No. 16536618
>>16536529
they got rid of some crappy girders at the top, which raises the space wide enough for starlinks
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 22:29:53 UTC No. 16536620
when blue orgin launch?
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 22:32:06 UTC No. 16536621
>>16536620
NET Wednesday.
Actually launch? Who knows.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 22:37:20 UTC No. 16536623
>>16535998
unrealistic, make it 69m high
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 22:52:01 UTC No. 16536631
>>16536615
>I just assumed
Sure you did Patel
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 23:12:26 UTC No. 16536642
V2 is warming up to me. I actually think it looks better than V1. It's sleeker.
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 23:14:48 UTC No. 16536644
>>16536181
wow that's big
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 23:18:17 UTC No. 16536646
>>16536588
too bad for you I see right through your lies and pilpul
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 23:20:31 UTC No. 16536647
https://archive.4plebs.org/_/search
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 23:21:52 UTC No. 16536648
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 23:25:03 UTC No. 16536651
I'm coining a new term, Indian Derangement Syndrome
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 23:36:21 UTC No. 16536657
hey you guys seem like experts, and googling has failed me. I'm trying to find out what a graph like pic is called. the rocket starts out normal on earth, travels, and ends up upside down on mars/moon/whatever. I know I've seen something like this before but I can't find it now
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 23:52:41 UTC No. 16536664
Venus is cool because it’s the evening star
Anonymous at Sun, 5 Jan 2025 23:57:21 UTC No. 16536666
>>16536660
Need a hammerhead style Starship.
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 00:26:59 UTC No. 16536685
>>16536660
New Glenn (if it works) will be a better rocket than falcon heavy
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 00:37:29 UTC No. 16536690
>>16536432
>zigger
reddit is the other way bud
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 00:49:59 UTC No. 16536702
https://x.com/Space_Time3/status/18
BG NET Jan 10 now
Same day as flight 7?
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 01:04:09 UTC No. 16536710
>>16536664
It's the opposite of Earth.
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 01:04:22 UTC No. 16536711
>>16536602
>Only musk has launch systems
>Only SpaceX does space operations
Yes
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 01:05:08 UTC No. 16536714
>>16536657
I know exactly what you mean but I don't know the exact name either. Concept of operations often includes it but I'm not sure that's only this chart.
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 01:06:01 UTC No. 16536716
Does Elon not understand that the President has ZERO effect on space policy? It's all on Congress
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 01:07:19 UTC No. 16536717
>>16536602
If you subtract spacex there is literally no western launch capabilities. ESA had a pathetic 3 launches and ULA still can't launch and return astronauts.
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 01:07:28 UTC No. 16536718
Yep, NG got moved to the 10th.
>NG and SS on the same day
Fucking kino.
That means, in my timezone, I will get to watch NG launch while I'm having my morning cup of tea, then when I'm in bed later that night, I will get to watch SS launch while drinking my nightly glass of milk.
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 01:07:51 UTC No. 16536720
>>16536716
Perhaps, but also consider that POTUS carries a heavy “fall in line” stick that he or she can use to sway how fellow party members vote on certain things
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 01:07:58 UTC No. 16536721
>>16536620
when we are ready
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 01:10:47 UTC No. 16536724
>>16536716
Bully pulpit influence. Also there have been times where Congress straight-up asks the president which programs to keep alive.
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 01:13:31 UTC No. 16536728
>>16536685
New Glenn will have to compete directly with FH on cost/kg. It will be interesting how the market price tracks, considering NG second stage is horrendously expensive.
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 01:16:46 UTC No. 16536736
>>16536718
Scrub
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 01:16:52 UTC No. 16536737
What is even the cost of Nuu Glenn?
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 01:17:05 UTC No. 16536738
>>16536251
>It looks unmanned
haha yeah
>>16536623
that would make it difficult to launch
if I was really not fucking around I'd just put legs on my spaceplane and tail land it, but unfortunately I am, in fact, fucking around
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 01:17:42 UTC No. 16536739
What is even the cost of New Glenn?
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 01:18:54 UTC No. 16536742
>>16536738
fat
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 01:21:09 UTC No. 16536745
>>16536739
>>16536737
Probably between 100-500 million per stack
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 01:28:26 UTC No. 16536754
>>16536685
The FH was an after thought and probably a waste of time
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 01:28:52 UTC No. 16536755
>>16536728
It's payload fairing is bigger so that might enable missions that are not possible on FH. It can also lift more so you can jam more shit in there to lower the cost
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 01:29:01 UTC No. 16536756
>>16536754
FH stole multiple payloads from SLS, it was absolutely necessary
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 01:30:01 UTC No. 16536757
New Glenn is real
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 01:32:58 UTC No. 16536761
>>16536755
I would not be surprised to find that expendable FH is lower cost than reusable NG. As for price to customer, NG is unlikely to be priced to recoup dev costs. It will probably be priced near FH asking
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 01:34:09 UTC No. 16536763
>>16536685
falcon heavy is not a good rocket and was probably not worth their time
plus they then got retard payloads that demand they expend 1st stages
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 01:35:29 UTC No. 16536765
>>16536742
yeah
maybe something like this?
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 01:38:09 UTC No. 16536772
>>16536716
The President can say
>We have to primary Congressman Oldspace "quickly"!! MAGA!
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 01:40:44 UTC No. 16536774
>>16536761
ArianeSpace calculated New Glenn's cost to customer to be $68 million, midway between baseline F9 and baseline FH pricing. This will kill everyone but BO and SpaceX lol
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 01:43:02 UTC No. 16536778
>>16536761
It's still going to be lower than any old space rockets and the price will come down over time
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 01:44:01 UTC No. 16536779
>>16536774
NG won't have the cadence to kill anything
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 01:48:37 UTC No. 16536785
>>16536774
>midway between baseline F9
maybe internal but that's the same as f9's cost to customer is it not?
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 01:50:12 UTC No. 16536786
>>16536779
Price dumping, my dear sir
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 01:51:48 UTC No. 16536788
>>16536785
the cheapest F9 is closer to 50 million
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 01:54:57 UTC No. 16536789
>>16536660
Once it launches New Glenn will be the best operational rocket in the world by a mile
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 01:58:27 UTC No. 16536791
>>16536660
New Glenn will get us to Mars
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 02:06:28 UTC No. 16536798
>>16536660
New Glenn is the largest most powerful rocket ever built. Most accurate rocket, most cheapest rocket ever buikt
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 02:21:06 UTC No. 16536805
oh please please lord Elon, let New Glenn and Starship launch on the same day, that would be so kino
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 02:33:51 UTC No. 16536817
what if new glenn and starshit collided?
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 02:38:53 UTC No. 16536820
what if new glenn and starship kissed?
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 02:41:30 UTC No. 16536822
the two rockets are going to fuck
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 02:44:27 UTC No. 16536824
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 02:50:46 UTC No. 16536828
>>16536395
Wooden sailboats colonized the whole world.
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 03:15:01 UTC No. 16536851
>>16536828
This. Why did he just own himself like that?
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 03:15:59 UTC No. 16536852
>>16535035
Kys twittertard
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 03:30:44 UTC No. 16536861
>>16536716
>the President has ZERO effect on space policy?
oh no it's retarded
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 03:32:31 UTC No. 16536863
>>16536728
>New Glenn will have to compete directly with FH on cost/kg
FH is for high energy launches, Glenn is competing with F9
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 03:33:50 UTC No. 16536865
>>16536714
Hm. Found several examples only referring to it as CONOPs. I guess I couldn't remember the name because it doesn't have one.
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 03:34:51 UTC No. 16536868
>>16536728
Don't the revised NG payload numbers put it on par with F9?
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 03:36:57 UTC No. 16536870
>>16536420
He's a jewish slav, what do you want
>>16536395
Starship is plenty big for ten people to make the trip per ship
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 04:09:46 UTC No. 16536891
Joe Barnard is humanity's best hope for becoming an interplanetary species.
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 04:13:39 UTC No. 16536896
>>16536891
he was smart in finding a GF right before he started losing his hair
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 04:20:38 UTC No. 16536901
>>16536889
too late i've already eaten it
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 04:30:47 UTC No. 16536913
>both of them launching on the same day
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 04:31:38 UTC No. 16536916
>>16536913
no, new glenn is going to be delayed
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 04:39:53 UTC No. 16536922
>>16536916
source?
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 04:42:27 UTC No. 16536925
>>16536922
the oracle of delphi
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 05:36:18 UTC No. 16536944
>>16536925
More like the oracle of delhi you fucking shitsmeared jeet
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 05:37:29 UTC No. 16536946
>>16536945
thank you starship news poster
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 05:45:45 UTC No. 16536949
>>16536943
Struts solve wobble
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 06:14:31 UTC No. 16536959
>Elon just wanted to hire the ISRO guy who's only job is to yell NARMAL
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 06:14:47 UTC No. 16536960
>>16536949
>kraken shows up
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 06:22:23 UTC No. 16536966
>>16536186
will we build a giant Dykeson Sphere around the sun?
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 06:28:39 UTC No. 16536969
>>16536966
God I hope not. Dykeshit sucks.
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 06:36:01 UTC No. 16536972
new glenn, on its maiden flight, will deliver more payload to orbit than starship has done in 6
let that sink in
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 06:37:45 UTC No. 16536977
>>16536972
It's actually for melon. Arrest him now.
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 06:38:15 UTC No. 16536979
>>16536977
over*
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 06:38:33 UTC No. 16536980
>>16536664
>be me wageslave
>working long hours into the evening
>tired and want to kys at the end of the shift
>come out and see the outside world for the first time in like 10 hours
>see this amazingly bright star low on the horizon
>feel in awe at the universe, smile a little
I love you Venus
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 06:44:01 UTC No. 16536981
>>16536972
Okay, I let the sink in, now what?
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 06:51:55 UTC No. 16536984
>>16536981
Keep vacuuming up Musk’s semen
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 06:53:08 UTC No. 16536985
>>16536980
based
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 06:57:11 UTC No. 16536987
https://x.com/KenKirtland17/status/
This is Fucxing hilarious lmaooooooo
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 06:57:16 UTC No. 16536988
>>16536980
>tired and want to kys at the end of the shift
literally me
but then I think, if I end it all now then I won't be able to see people on Mars lol
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 06:58:20 UTC No. 16536990
>>16536984
Roger that
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 07:00:01 UTC No. 16536992
>>16536984
if that helps us reach mars faster, then I'd gladly do it.
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 07:02:08 UTC No. 16536993
>>16536987
#Ad
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 07:14:21 UTC No. 16536996
>>16536980
me going to the beach to watch a rocket launch
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 07:16:28 UTC No. 16536998
>>16536997
yes, but only one of those two options is fun to build in ksp, have you considered that?
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 07:19:13 UTC No. 16537000
>>16536997
The left one would cost 100+ billions of dollars.
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 07:20:32 UTC No. 16537001
>>16536972
if it blows up it will be grounded for two years
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 07:21:32 UTC No. 16537003
>>16536993
can you make a webm out of it??
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 07:25:19 UTC No. 16537006
>>16537000
and the right one would take 100+ of launches...
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 07:25:33 UTC No. 16537007
>>16536998
it's Starship
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 07:26:56 UTC No. 16537008
>>16536896
The moment she goes off birth control she will hate him.
Many such cases
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 07:37:50 UTC No. 16537012
>>16537006
I forgot to write that it would cost 100+ billions of dollars to launch. Those program itself would likely cost 500+ billions of dollars.
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 07:44:44 UTC No. 16537014
>>16537012
delusional
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 07:53:03 UTC No. 16537016
>>16536987
kek it's really good
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 07:57:05 UTC No. 16537018
https://x.com/SLIM_JAXA/status/1876
SLIM is kill
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 08:00:25 UTC No. 16537020
>>16537018
the whole space industry, excluding spacex, really sucks.
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 08:02:32 UTC No. 16537021
>>16537020
like really sucks. it's bad news, after bad news, after cancellation, after budget cuts, after delay, after delay, etc etc the same thing for the last 50 years. thank goodness musk was born.
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 08:03:18 UTC No. 16537022
0i poop i pee i stink.
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 08:05:04 UTC No. 16537023
>>16537020
>>16537018
I worked with JAXA on some roooover stuff a couple months back. Like goddamn they were all using 2008 netbooks. Gah.
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 08:10:40 UTC No. 16537025
>>16537022
Thank you for you comment.
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 08:56:28 UTC No. 16537036
Only one more delay needed for Starship flight 7 to happen before New Glenn flight 1.
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 09:34:38 UTC No. 16537042
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 10:08:14 UTC No. 16537066
>>16536943
been there, done that. yes its scary af.
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 11:48:31 UTC No. 16537136
>>16534344
I was sure I read articles only a couple years ago about something to do with superposition or absolute zero and "weird gravity anomalies". But I just googled even that and nothing's really popping up.
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 11:51:27 UTC No. 16537138
>>16535070
I don't give a shit about this ex-marine being assassinated for something and CIA going full Ted K character assassination on him.
What's important is the science.
I could have sworn there was a legitimate effect on gravity the closer particles got to absolute zero. There were legitimate breakthroughs and it was even on TV.
I'm a little worried because Google doesn't remember them.
I didn't pay that much attention to it, so maybe I'm just misremembering a different breakthrough.
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 11:52:29 UTC No. 16537139
>>16535368
>ignores south america
Apparently, rainforests are not arable.
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 11:53:21 UTC No. 16537140
>>16537139
They don't make for good cropland after being cleared.
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 11:54:30 UTC No. 16537141
>>16535214
>break humanity's dependence on chemical rocketry?
Literally impossible without us turning into ethereal matter that isn't somehow chemical.
I think you fail to understand the term "chemical" here. Or the phrase "chemical rocketry".
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 11:56:43 UTC No. 16537143
>>16535219
>this is why Elon must commit sudoku to his company by hiring undereducated indians
You want to know why most shit is breaking nowadays far easier than it did 15 years ago?
Imagine hiring gypsies and then thinking you were going to get the same level of quality.
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 11:58:46 UTC No. 16537144
>>16535522
That is a looooot of space junk.
I guess the future really is Planetes.
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 12:02:36 UTC No. 16537145
>>16535818
No, our bombers attack random muslims and jews, not shitty overpriced garbage trucks.
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 12:05:03 UTC No. 16537149
>>16536888
wrong trips, cirno
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 12:52:37 UTC No. 16537172
>>16536828
sailboats are so sexo
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 12:53:45 UTC No. 16537173
>>16536980
Thats vesper
Anonymous at Mon, 6 Jan 2025 14:33:30 UTC No. 16537230
>>16537149
she can't count