Image not available

4096x2304

GgyjKIJWAAAzzmG[1].jpg

๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

/sfg/ - Spaceflight General No. 16539626

v2 launch on 13th january
previous >>16537041

Anonymous No. 16539630

JPL will burn, rejoice!

Anonymous No. 16539631

THE OLD ONE IS STILL ON PAGE 9 REEeeeeeeeee!!!!one!

Anonymous No. 16539638

Page 9ine

Anonymous No. 16539639

brilliant pebbles

Anonymous No. 16539640

>>16539630
this is all because Jack Parsons consorted with devils.

Anonymous No. 16539645

why hexagons
why not triangles

Anonymous No. 16539648

>>16539630
>another delay for dragonfly
Please, God no.

Anonymous No. 16539652

>>16539648
Rocket Lab will build a better Dragonfly

Anonymous No. 16539653

>>16539652
>Rocket Lab being allowed near an RTG in the next decade
lol no

Anonymous No. 16539655

>>16539653
They will get COTS RTG.

Anonymous No. 16539656

>>16539648
JPL isnt building Dragonfly

Image not available

368x368

4.png

Anonymous No. 16539660

is 4chan breaking? for some reason this sfg, the main comment is the thread title in the catalog and in my browser tab name

Anonymous No. 16539664

>>16539660
oh lol the silly OP made their NAME the title

Image not available

1530x180

reddit.png

Anonymous No. 16539667

>>16539630

Anonymous No. 16539670

>>16539667
go back there, faggot

Anonymous No. 16539754

>>16539645
Too pointy

Anonymous No. 16539779

>>16539645
Hexagons are just 6 triangles

Anonymous No. 16539782

>>16539779
no, 6 sides

Image not available

819x460

hexagon.png

Anonymous No. 16539786

>>16539782
Someone failed geometry

Anonymous No. 16539800

>>16539645
the real reason is they would be have to be too small to get smooth enough curves, increasing the number of tiles that need to be fitted.

Anonymous No. 16539816

>>16539645
triangle tiles would mean more surface area exposed to the reentry heat reaction, because it dramatically increases the number of seams

the more tiles you use, the more likely one of them will fail

Anonymous No. 16539820

>>16539816
then why not make one big tile?

Anonymous No. 16539821

>>16539816
Maybe. They don't seem to be that concerned about tile failures; Starship is designed to tank individual failures and SpaceX's overall philosophy seems to be "just get good enough at parts so that we're not worried about them failing." My guess would be that triangular tiles would increase the minimum number of attachment points past what they want to put up with.

Anonymous No. 16539828

>>16539820
that would be ideal in a best case scenario, at least for the issues I'm pointing out

however, installation and reuse would be ridiculously hard
to say nothing of the difficulty in actually manufacturing such a massive single plate

Anonymous No. 16539830

>>16539786
why did you post a cube?

Anonymous No. 16539841

another problem with the "single plate" idea is quality control

if there's a structural flaw detected, you'd have to replace the entire thing
whereas if it's just one tile that's not a big deal because you mass produce them

Anonymous No. 16539842

>>16539786
I count 6 sides

Anonymous No. 16539850

>>16539786
someome ripp3d there penis in half

Anonymous No. 16539867

>>16539842
6 triangles

Anonymous No. 16539879

this thread is gay as fuck I'm making a new one

sage No. 16539891

real thread here
>>16539884
>>16539884
>>16539884

Anonymous No. 16539892

>>16539891
don't be a faggot, nigger

Anonymous No. 16539897

>>16539879
awww little penis hurty?

Anonymous No. 16539914

>>16539867
it's 1 hexagon, hexa means 6, gon means sides. 6 sides

Anonymous No. 16539948

>>16539914
nobodys said anything about sides

Anonymous No. 16539952

>>16539948
triangles are a separate kimd of shape. they have 3 angles (tri, angle)

Anonymous No. 16539986

>>16539914
>hexa
magic
>gon
dragon
hope this helps

Anonymous No. 16540001

>>16539986
hats are gone