Anonymous at Fri, 17 Jan 2025 08:31:49 UTC No. 16553413
>>16553397
Global warming/climate change hysteria was btfo 15 years ago when it was conclusively proven that over ocean readings were being "calibrated" in the satellites when they didn't need it over land targets.
Anonymous at Fri, 17 Jan 2025 18:33:44 UTC No. 16554070
>>16553397
>Atmosphere saturated with carbon dioxide
That's retarded though. If that was true then either dry ice or liquid CO2 would have to be stable at atmospheric conditions. If more was pushed into air, then it would rain down like water/snow, hard to say which, as you'd have to throw currently known properties of CO2 out of the window anyway
Anonymous at Fri, 17 Jan 2025 18:37:27 UTC No. 16554076
wat
Anonymous at Fri, 17 Jan 2025 18:42:17 UTC No. 16554080
>>16553397
ITT: OP attempts to redefine /sci/ as anti-/sci/ shills.
Anonymous at Fri, 17 Jan 2025 18:43:44 UTC No. 16554085
>>16554070
Well said, Anon. You the Real Real MVP.
Anonymous at Fri, 17 Jan 2025 20:16:02 UTC No. 16554194
Anonymous at Fri, 17 Jan 2025 22:07:29 UTC No. 16554355
>>16554070
you aren't capable of comprehending whats being said in the article OP pic refers to because you don't have the relevant scientific education and background knowledge in the topic being discussed, it is only via dunning-krugerism that you presume you understand the topic being discussed.
Anonymous at Fri, 17 Jan 2025 23:23:42 UTC No. 16554462
>>16554355
>You can't understand the invalid, incorrect conclusions of a retracted paper!
>But I, SchizoMan, am able to comprwhend due to the largeness of my brain's mind.
>As measured by my perfect 100 IQ.
Anonymous at Fri, 17 Jan 2025 23:34:14 UTC No. 16554490
>>16553397
so more carbon emissions... will raise earth's temperature? I'm struggling to understand what exactly sci was wrong about here.
Anonymous at Fri, 17 Jan 2025 23:44:21 UTC No. 16554509
>>16554080
>Science is whatever I agree with.
Anonymous at Fri, 17 Jan 2025 23:46:12 UTC No. 16554513
>>16554509
Correction: They think science is whatever the blue people agree with.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Jan 2025 00:45:28 UTC No. 16554577
>>16554490
>more carbon emissions won't make any difference
You have attention deficiency.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Jan 2025 00:47:01 UTC No. 16554580
>>16554490
The paper was retracted because it proved the prevailing theory wrong.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Jan 2025 00:55:28 UTC No. 16554584
>>16554580
>The paper was retracted because it proved the prevailing theory wrong.
More likely than not.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Jan 2025 02:15:05 UTC No. 16554658
>>16554076
you are dealing with retarded /pol/tards...
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Jan 2025 02:38:22 UTC No. 16554680
>>16554509
>i agree with the retracted paper
>ergo, it is science