Anonymous at Fri, 17 Jan 2025 14:52:21 UTC No. 16553772

Less than 100%. More energy is used by the battery for electrolysis than you can get back from the system. From what I've read electrolyzing sewage is just a treatment option that separates out pure water at a lower energy cost than other processes.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 Jan 2025 14:54:33 UTC No. 16553775

>>16553766
What's the setup?

Anonymous at Fri, 17 Jan 2025 14:58:03 UTC No. 16553780

>>16553766
>Table-top fission is much more efficient.
Does it really matter if you have nearly unlimited amounts of urine?

Anonymous at Fri, 17 Jan 2025 15:03:19 UTC No. 16553791

>>16553772
>More energy is used by the battery for electrolysis than you can get back from the system.
I (>>16553780) am retarded. More coffee, less posting.

Anonymous at Fri, 17 Jan 2025 19:16:10 UTC No. 16554114

>>16553766
more efficient than you leaving your piss bottles everywhere

Anonymous at Fri, 17 Jan 2025 19:27:09 UTC No. 16554137

>How efficient can this be?
>About 91–96% of urine consists of water.
>The remainder can be broadly characterized into inorganic salts, urea, organic compounds, and organic ammonium salts.

also that's just a normal diesel generator

Anonymous at Fri, 17 Jan 2025 19:30:52 UTC No. 16554142

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/african-girls-pee-powered-generator-raises-questions-flna1c6956099

Anonymous at Fri, 17 Jan 2025 19:40:39 UTC No. 16554154

>>16554142
>Botte said, adding that the student's work is "empowering" and suggested they work with an engineer to understand the technology and its appropriate applications.
basically saying they are retarded women who don't understand what they are doing

Anonymous at Fri, 17 Jan 2025 20:05:20 UTC No. 16554181

Highly efficient. y'all crackkkas are just racist

Anonymous at Fri, 17 Jan 2025 20:22:28 UTC No. 16554205

>1 litre of urine
>6 hours generated
why not just drink the urine and generate 12 hours instead?