๐งต Neural net can now predict what the brain will do in the next 5 seconds
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Jan 2025 03:26:49 UTC No. 16554721
Your brain's next 5 seconds, predicted by AI
Transformer predicts brain activity patterns 5 seconds into future using just 21 seconds of fMRI data
Achieves 0.997 correlation using modified time-series Transformer architecture
>https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/
>https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/
>https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.19814v1
APOLOGIZE
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Jan 2025 03:54:22 UTC No. 16554737
holy shit they can predict BOLD signals, it's over for us humans. i kneel, AI-sama.
Anonymous at Sat, 18 Jan 2025 03:55:59 UTC No. 16554741
>>16554721
>do the opposite of what the AI predicted
Wow I can time travel!
Anonymous at Sun, 19 Jan 2025 12:39:37 UTC No. 16556116
>>16554741
https://youtu.be/Sk0n5uozwcI
Anonymous at Sun, 19 Jan 2025 12:53:34 UTC No. 16556128
>>16554721
Cool, but can it predict how many r's I'm gonna use in the word strawberry?
Anonymous at Sun, 19 Jan 2025 14:26:30 UTC No. 16556166
>>16554721
This statement simply isn't true. Don't have to read the study either. It takes 0.01 seconds to recognize input complexity means this gacha headline is completely misleading. My suspicion is that they found some subsection of neurons and tried to predict the behavior in a controlled environment.
holy shit it is even worse then I thought. They fit model to some data without even testing it against actual brains. They smoothed the data which decreases granularity, thereby making it easier to claim accuracy. -remember here, we don't actually know what noise is. Then, they averaged over regional activity. Holy fucking shit lmfao
compooooooter bros, why you so fake and gay?
Anonymous at Sun, 19 Jan 2025 15:04:04 UTC No. 16556174
>>16554721
An AI that can finish your sentences? That's true love.
Anonymous at Sun, 19 Jan 2025 15:14:43 UTC No. 16556180
>brain activity patterns
so it's literally nothing
Anonymous at Sun, 19 Jan 2025 15:45:18 UTC No. 16556202
Determinists are proven victorious in the end
Anonymous at Sun, 19 Jan 2025 17:22:19 UTC No. 16556270
>>16554721
>>16556180
what's the difference between "brain activity patterns" and actual thoughts and actions derived from those?
Anonymous at Sun, 19 Jan 2025 17:33:19 UTC No. 16556277
>>16554721
>5 seconds
Anyone who finds this "research" convincing is an actual npc.
Anonymous at Sun, 19 Jan 2025 19:55:27 UTC No. 16556409
>>16554721
Free will cucks on suicide watch.
Anonymous at Sun, 19 Jan 2025 20:50:09 UTC No. 16556468
>>16556202
>>16556409
>determinism
>not 100%
>mfw
Anonymous at Sun, 19 Jan 2025 20:57:00 UTC No. 16556483
>>16556468
Just a matter of tuning.
Meanwhile "free" will that isn't 100% free isn't free.
Anonymous at Sun, 19 Jan 2025 20:59:34 UTC No. 16556487
>>16556483
>Just a matter of tuning.
sure buddy. also don't know what exactly did they predict, neuron activity for heart beat/breathing etc? that's predictable anyway.
Anonymous at Sun, 19 Jan 2025 21:00:46 UTC No. 16556489
>>16556180
BOLD signals, actually (a biological side-effect that is assumed to have some amount of functional correlation)
Anonymous at Sun, 19 Jan 2025 21:55:35 UTC No. 16556575
>>16556409
>>16556202
Determinism doesn't need to be proven for Free Will to be logically incoherent at a base level anyway, you've outed yourselves as dummies with these posts.