Image not available

403x450

Screenshot 2025-0....png

๐Ÿงต Neural net can now predict what the brain will do in the next 5 seconds

Anonymous No. 16554721

Your brain's next 5 seconds, predicted by AI

Transformer predicts brain activity patterns 5 seconds into future using just 21 seconds of fMRI data

Achieves 0.997 correlation using modified time-series Transformer architecture


>https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/1880184389218496770
>https://x.com/rohanpaul_ai/status/1880184392968204580
>https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.19814v1

APOLOGIZE

Anonymous No. 16554737

holy shit they can predict BOLD signals, it's over for us humans. i kneel, AI-sama.

Image not available

500x500

1736665633774745.png

Anonymous No. 16554741

>>16554721
>do the opposite of what the AI predicted
Wow I can time travel!

Anonymous No. 16556116

>>16554741
https://youtu.be/Sk0n5uozwcI

Anonymous No. 16556128

>>16554721
Cool, but can it predict how many r's I'm gonna use in the word strawberry?

Anonymous No. 16556166

>>16554721
This statement simply isn't true. Don't have to read the study either. It takes 0.01 seconds to recognize input complexity means this gacha headline is completely misleading. My suspicion is that they found some subsection of neurons and tried to predict the behavior in a controlled environment.
holy shit it is even worse then I thought. They fit model to some data without even testing it against actual brains. They smoothed the data which decreases granularity, thereby making it easier to claim accuracy. -remember here, we don't actually know what noise is. Then, they averaged over regional activity. Holy fucking shit lmfao
compooooooter bros, why you so fake and gay?

Anonymous No. 16556174

>>16554721
An AI that can finish your sentences? That's true love.

Anonymous No. 16556180

>brain activity patterns
so it's literally nothing

Anonymous No. 16556202

Determinists are proven victorious in the end

Anonymous No. 16556270

>>16554721
>>16556180
what's the difference between "brain activity patterns" and actual thoughts and actions derived from those?

Anonymous No. 16556277

>>16554721
>5 seconds
Anyone who finds this "research" convincing is an actual npc.

Anonymous No. 16556409

>>16554721
Free will cucks on suicide watch.

Anonymous No. 16556468

>>16556202
>>16556409
>determinism
>not 100%
>mfw

Anonymous No. 16556483

>>16556468
Just a matter of tuning.
Meanwhile "free" will that isn't 100% free isn't free.

Anonymous No. 16556487

>>16556483
>Just a matter of tuning.
sure buddy. also don't know what exactly did they predict, neuron activity for heart beat/breathing etc? that's predictable anyway.

Anonymous No. 16556489

>>16556180
BOLD signals, actually (a biological side-effect that is assumed to have some amount of functional correlation)

Anonymous No. 16556575

>>16556409
>>16556202
Determinism doesn't need to be proven for Free Will to be logically incoherent at a base level anyway, you've outed yourselves as dummies with these posts.