🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 14:44:20 UTC No. 16578428

>be me
>14 years old
>come up with determinism by myself
>realize the universe could be predicted if we had all the data, paradoxes would collapse reality
>reinvent Laplace’s Demon without knowing it
>death anxiety and existential dread set in
>turn to absurdism to cope

>15 years old
>start thinking about quantum mechanics
>entanglement messes with determinism
>come up with ER = EPR theory on my own

>16 years old
>start thinking about how we could use entanglement for communication
>focus on when particles collapse instead of what they collapse into
>collapse a ton of entangled particles simultaneously, see if it’s statistically impossible by chance
>timing of collapse becomes the information, not the outcome
>holyshitthiscouldwork.png

>someone argues:
"You can’t send info because you need classical communication to compare results, and you can't force a pattern without violating quantum mechanics."

>my counter-argument:

"You’re right about comparing data, but you don’t need to compare it if we detect mass simultaneous collapse. If one side collapses a ton of particles at once, it creates an impossible event. The receiver doesn’t need to compare—it’s detectable in real-time.

Think of it like a light switch—if 100 floodlights turn on at once, you don’t need to check; you instantly know something happened. Probability becomes the message. We can bypass light-speed limits if this works."

>tfw I might have just found a loophole in quantum mechanics
>tfw nobody will take it seriously because I don’t have a PhD
>tfw I have to wait until I’m older to prove I was right all along