🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 21:37:19 UTC No. 16578809
The depicted graph is made up of six vertices or points, which are connected by seven edges or lines.
The correct way to number the seven paths is:
(1)-------07-------(2)
(1)-------08-------(4)
(2)-------09-------(3)
(2)-------10-------(4)
(3)-------11-------(5)
(4)-------12-------(5)
(5)-------13-------(6)
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 21:38:52 UTC No. 16578813
there is no "correct" way to number paths on a graph
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 21:43:43 UTC No. 16578820
>>16578813
>there is no "correct" way to number paths on a graph
oh yes there is
namely in numerical order:
12
14
23
24
35
45
56
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 21:49:36 UTC No. 16578831
>>16578820
those are the edges not the paths
and it's still whatever arbitrary nonsense order
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 22:05:25 UTC No. 16578853
bait
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 22:18:59 UTC No. 16578872
>>16578831
>the edges not the paths
edges = lines = paths
>arbitrary nonsense order
no, it's numerical order
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 22:37:05 UTC No. 16578908
>graph
>connect the dots
Such a strange place, this /sci/.
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 22:37:20 UTC No. 16578909
some natural orders are:
alphabetical order
chronological order
numerical order
Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 22:49:45 UTC No. 16578928
>>16578872
>edges = lines = paths
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Feb 2025 01:15:43 UTC No. 16579048
>>16578928
Every edge is a short walk, trail, or path.
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Feb 2025 11:03:32 UTC No. 16579315
why do /sci/tizens reply to nonsensical OPs? ignoring them instead of trying to attribute sense to them is our only way, with jannies asleep at the wheel, to get rid of all the schizoposters and trolls.
Anonymous at Sat, 8 Feb 2025 11:17:24 UTC No. 16579329
>>16578809
The seven paths in non-numerical order:
(1)-------07-------(2)
(1)-------09-------(4) should be 08
(2)-------08-------(3) should be 09
(2)-------10-------(4)
(3)-------11-------(5)
(4)-------12-------(5)
(5)-------13-------(6)
27/99 at Sat, 8 Feb 2025 14:02:12 UTC No. 16579409
>>16579329
>(1)-------09-------(4) should be 08
>(2)-------08-------(3) should be 09
A whopping 2/7 = 285714/999999 of the paths aren't in numerical order.
72/99 at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 01:06:56 UTC No. 16579868
>>16579329
>(1)-------07-------(2)
>[...]
>[...]
>(2)-------10-------(4)
>(3)-------11-------(5)
>(4)-------12-------(5)
>(5)-------13-------(6)
Only 5/7 = 714285/999999 of the paths are in numerical order.
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 15:02:37 UTC No. 16580370
2/7 = 285714/999999
+
5/7 = 714285/999999
=
7/7 = 999999/999999
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 18:10:56 UTC No. 16580494
>>16579329
>(1)-------07-------(2)
>(1)-------09-------(4) should be 08
>(2)-------08-------(3) should be 09
>(2)-------10-------(4)
>(3)-------11-------(5)
>(4)-------12-------(5)
>(5)-------13-------(6)
Only a moron would number the seven paths in this order.
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 18:13:14 UTC No. 16580498
You have numbers and letters
Pick one, then the other.
>2 goes to 8 via 9 13 and 27
vs
>A goes to B via 1 5 and 19
Wikipedia at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 18:25:27 UTC No. 16580506
>>16580498
>You have numbers and letters
>Pick one, then the other.
>>2 goes to 8 via 9 13 and 27
>vs
>>A goes to B via 1 5 and 19
Non sequitur may refer to:
- Non sequitur (fallacy), an invalid argument whose conclusion is not supported by its premises
- Non sequitur (literary device), an irrelevant, often humorous comment to a preceding topic or statement