Anonymous at Fri, 7 Feb 2025 23:37:55 UTC No. 16578993

>>16578978
thats why we dont have computer programmers and we just let them evolve on their own into something useful.

Anonymous at Sat, 8 Feb 2025 01:56:43 UTC No. 16579079

>>16578993
Why do they all go trans then

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 01:11:20 UTC No. 16580829

>>16578978
exactly, that's why rape evolved, thank you anon

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 14:28:18 UTC No. 16581308

low IQ thread

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 14:40:05 UTC No. 16581314

>>16578978
>males hanging around doing nothing
Males literally do everything. How is a female supposed to track down a deer and kill it with a spear while holding a baby and lacking spatial awareness and upper body strength.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 14:44:00 UTC No. 16581319

>>16581314
A lot of the perceived weaknesses of Women are actually strengths; the idea of staying home whilst someone else does the labor for instance displays a clear power structure where the Woman is above the Man. Men as kind of 'suicide drones' sent out to kill themselves bringing home food could account for the physical differences and the differences in states of mind from the male to female in our species. A smaller frame for Women, then, could even be theorized as an evolutionary strategy if the goal of the female, at a biological level, was to be considered harmless in the mind of the male; in need of protection so as to arouse his sympathies and desire to protect and feed her .Also interesting the whole small frame as an evolutionary advantage in invoking sympathy, with a shift in beauty standards towards higher and higher neoteny, which could easily fit the narrative that higher neoteny invokes stronger feelings of wanting to protect and nurture from men. Even the explosive resurgence of the term 'daddy' or the 'dadbod' glorification which wasn't as prevalent before would fit into this narrative.

As evolutionary strategy the difference of our species from most other species, where the female is larger and more physically violent, suggests a radical divergence occurring where Women at some point became content enough with their ability to have Men do what they wanted and fight their battles for them; not needing too these things themselves, so the frame and musculature was lost over time.

Even the habit, seemingly, of Men to attack each when a perceived transgression against Women by a Man has take place suggests a deep hardwiring of Men to be completely subservient towards Women. I used to think this was pheromonal perhaps but with the internet e can see it occurs even when the Man is 'white knighting' for a static image of a Woman; i.e. no proximity necessary for pheromones to account for it.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 14:45:01 UTC No. 16581321

>>16581319
There's no moral judgment being made about this, or anything. Really if Men are hardwired to be suici drones for Women then it only really matters what the goal of one Woman to the next is; whether they have intellect to make use of this position or whether they're stuck in the cave mentality, getting their tribe killed over demands for pretty bits of twig to put in their hair, etc.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 14:51:56 UTC No. 16581328

>>16578978
nobody cares pol retard

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 15:01:07 UTC No. 16581332

>>16578978
>>Evolution selects that which works and dosent care about your feelings
That's why evolution selects rapists. So society is now privileging only one type of reproduction strategy to the advantage of females and punishing other types of reproduction strategy. That's not natural selection. That's artificial jewish matriarchy.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 15:43:19 UTC No. 16581393

>>16581332
You can still rape women, you just gotta keep them lock up for 9 month is your basement. Do you even rape bro?

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 16:08:51 UTC No. 16581434

>>16581393
That was before sperm bank fraud became a thing. Get with the times boomer.