Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 05:06:41 UTC No. 16579994

I don't understand this propaganda.
>wow I own a few things that aren't special and I'm miserable!
yeah you have to go outside and do stuff sometimes

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 06:15:45 UTC No. 16580021

>>16579990
Right side:
>entire life is a sham
>chasing after the false promise that if she just gets enough instagram likes then she'll be happy

Left side:
>entire life is a sham
>depressed because he chased after the false promise that if he just worked hard enough then he'd be happy
>got blackpilled so now chasing the same false promise as the thot on the right except he's doing it through depressionposting instead of staged selfies on a beach

Right side wins, but only because she's got tits (not great ones, but still...)

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 06:29:37 UTC No. 16580027

>>16579990
Absolutely. Scientifically speaking, that guy should learn from that gal and start dancing. Smoking some weed may also help.

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 06:30:25 UTC No. 16580028

>>16579990
>Let's get creative!

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 06:39:09 UTC No. 16580032

>>16580021
> have holes
everybody does
Imagine being an ugly female (most of them are)

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 07:12:10 UTC No. 16580048

>>16579990
I just find myself so strangely compelled to study and perform it. The thought of "will this make me happy" doesn't come to mind.

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 10:30:34 UTC No. 16580157

>>16579990
No but biology in particular makes it easier to cope with it.

pic in >>16580021 for example isn't as depressing when you realize that's just how humans evolved to be. Women have to give birth and take care of the offspring, are more valueable from a reproductive perspective because they're the bottleneck for how much offspring can produced, them having XX chromosomes makes them far less likely to express recessive genes, etc. All of this combined means they don't benefit from taking risks as much, they're not expendanble so they're not meant to engage in direct confrontation, they are less likely to have very good/bad traits, their IQ distribution is less varied, they prefer security over freedom, etc. Women are high floor, low ceiling. A woman is guranteed a comfy existence because that's what's optimal for the species.

Men on the other hand are expendable, don't need a huge reproductive system for giving birth, XY means any recessive genes on X manifest, etc. As a consequence, men are prone to risks, built for direct confrontation, prefer freedom over security, have much more IQ variance (more retards, more geniuses). Men have a low floor, but a high ceiling. A man is guranteed nothing, but can work his way up to much more.

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 10:50:32 UTC No. 16580169

>>16579990
That's a male vs female problem

Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 01:20:28 UTC No. 16582043

>>16580021
ill bite

Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 02:15:36 UTC No. 16582065

>>16580021
Cope

Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 02:48:52 UTC No. 16582093

>>16580021
>instagram
nobody uses insta anymore

Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 02:53:58 UTC No. 16582095

>>16580021
this is not true, I had more girls interested in me before I started properly working out

Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 03:18:41 UTC No. 16582113

>>16582043
>be really good at something
It's fucking over

Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 07:55:01 UTC No. 16582257

>>16580157
not him but thanks for elaborating, this makes me less angry. At least not at women but at whoever coded this reality

Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 08:33:06 UTC No. 16582285

>>16582257
It could be much worse anyways and being a woman has its disadvantages too. Female intrasexual competition for example, especially competitor derogation, is pretty fucking depressing. Women are not meant to engage in direct confrontation, it's not beneficial for species to put them at risk of physical harm, so they developed strategies based on indirect aggression towards each other. They literally can't help but gossip, talk shit behind each other's back, give fake compliments that are actually meant to make the other woman continue doing something that makes her appear worse (i.e. complimenting a terrible haircut and insisting she keeps it that way). Slut shaming is also something women actually do instinctively to prevent devaluation of sex. All of this gets especially pronounced during ovulation. Women are brutally fake towards each other, and they can't even be blamed for it because it's not conscious, that's just what they are.

Male intrasexual competition on the other is much more honest. It can be very fierce, obviously, probably even fiercer because we're not the selectors, but at least males can trust each other outside of direct confrontation. We will engange in fights, try to outperform each at work, sports, etc., but we can also form genuine relationships with no double meaning. When we're done competing, we can get a beer and have a good time. For women, that beer is yet another fight.

Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 09:00:20 UTC No. 16582305

>>16582285
>>16580157
Not going to argue with most of your points since I'm a bit into evolutionary psychology myself. Just a few points:
>A woman is guranteed a comfy existence
>A man is guranteed nothing
You forgot to add that this also means that a woman is almost guaranteed to have offspring, while a man is highly likely to remain childless. So if you want grandkids you sure as hell should make your wife abort all male fetuses.
>Female intrasexual competition for example, especially competitor derogation, is pretty fucking depressing
What is depressing is that, thanks to the internet, women now also employ these tactics against men and we seem to be completely powerless against it, since this is a woman's home game.
>They literally can't help but gossip, talk shit behind each other's back
On the other hand I'd argue that they're also capable of forming decades long lasting, close pair bonds. And on the internet they have another huge advantage over men - they form a collective which instinctively seems to support itself in political key questions (like abortion, confirming the myth of the gender pay gap etc.), which now gives them such great cultural and political power. Men seem utterly clueless as they're way too individualistic to form cohesive collective bands.
>When we're done competing, we can get a beer and have a good time. For women, that beer is yet another fight.
I'd disagree here because of what I wrote above. Almost all women have a "best friend" that they usually keep for decades, mostly until death. For men this is not true, men naturally hunt alone. There is a reason why most suicides are male and why most of those occur around the age of 50. I'd argue that men have a pretty hard time forming actual friendship, as we're less capable of forming emotional attachments towards our own gender. That's why men need a female romantic partner but women don't need men in any way (except for reproduction).

Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 09:06:39 UTC No. 16582312

>>16582043
I have all of those and I am a 31 year old virgin.

Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 09:13:21 UTC No. 16582315

>>16582305
>You forgot to add that this also means that a woman is almost guaranteed to have offspring, while a man is highly likely to remain childless.
Well yes that is a natural result.
>So if you want grandkids you sure as hell should make your wife abort all male fetuses.
If your resources are limited, sure, a daughter is more likely to have offspring, and if you want to optimize for the amount of grandkids, daughters only would make sense. Just making more offspring would be a better strategy I think if the goal is just to have any grandkids at all and resources are not tight.
>What is depressing is that, thanks to the internet, women now also employ these tactics against men and we seem to be completely powerless against it, since this is a woman's home game.
I don't think this is accurate. Women are playing a different game with men, because men are not their competition. Women compete with each other and give men shit tests to determine their worth. I'd say the woman in OP's webm made that video to appear attractive for men and appear better than other women. In this way it's more "honest" towards men.
>On the other hand I'd argue that they're also capable of forming decades long lasting, close pair bonds.
They have an easier time forming fake bonds. This seems perfectly logical to me - women are satisfied with fake bonds because dishonesty is their bread and butter, it's just how things are for them. Men on the other hand can't be fucked to deal with it, they're only interested in genuine relationships, which are harder to develop, which means they will happen less frequently.
>Almost all women have a "best friend" that they usually keep for decades, mostly until death.
I wouldn't say women are more prone to forming lifelong friendships but I never really got deep into that. Anecdotally, I've seen women being more comfortable with dumping and making new friends than men are.

1/2

Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 09:18:43 UTC No. 16582318

>>16582305
>There is a reason why most suicides are male and why most of those occur around the age of 50
This is also a bit more complicated than that. Women have more suicide attempts, but less successful suicides. Men have less attempts, but more successes. I believe this is influenced by a lot of factors, such as
>risk tolerance (women are less likely/men are more likely to commit to a high risk of death)
>social networks (women are more likely to seek help)
>purpose of the attempt (women are likely to make fake attempts to gather attention, it's a part of their game, men are less likely to engange in these games and make real attempts)

Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 10:45:12 UTC No. 16582348

Imagone making your persona on 'degree' (if you studied less than 6 years don't speak to me) or on work and or HOLY SHIT some Türkiye muslim auto mobile brand. Go travel meet people!!!

Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 11:32:24 UTC No. 16582365

>>16579990
In general, I'd say intellectualism takes perfectly adequate sub-geniuses and makes them into perfectly botlike imbeciles. Scientific education, or any kind of education, makes normies into bad people in a dozen different ways and should be made completely inaccessible to anyone except for those with outstanding intelligence and inquisitiveness.

Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 13:18:20 UTC No. 16582438

>>16580021
It's so unfair.
How do I honestly cope with this?

Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 17:13:55 UTC No. 16582681

>>16579990
guy on the left is
>skinny,
>pale,
>started balding,
>probably a nerd with some engineering/stemcel degree and low social skills
>patchy beard
>probably short
and he REALLY thought that bmw could save him lmao

Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 20:23:47 UTC No. 16582928

>>16582312
what are you really good at?

Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 20:31:18 UTC No. 16582940

>>16582928
Software design and 3D graphics programming.

Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 20:33:08 UTC No. 16582943

>>16582940
Is there anything you do that highlights your skills in those fields in any social environment? I.e. do you go to hackathons, present at conferences, or do anything where others can see your skill?

Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 20:35:37 UTC No. 16582949

>>16582943
No. I love the demoscene, especially Commodore 64 and Amiga 500 demoscene, but I'm too big of a wuss to attend a demo party. This is also the reason why I'm such a loser.

Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 20:43:13 UTC No. 16582960

>>16582949
Well there you go. You seem like you already know why you aren't achieving your best success. Going to a demo party, or if you're part of an institution, writing a research paper and publishing at a conference where people will find out about you are perfect ways for you to get the social proof to get attention. From there, its easy to talk to the opposite sex (as scant as they may be in a field like yours) in a real environment

Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 20:55:22 UTC No. 16582975

>>16582960
I know, I wasn't really complaining, I was simply stating the fact that without proper social skills and the will to actually socialize, one'll be a loser no matter what.

>as scant as they may be in a field like yours
It's actually depressing how rare women are in this field. Real women, I mean. Almost every time I've found a woman on the internet who is interested in the same stuff as I am, it's a freaking man in disguise.

Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 20:57:41 UTC No. 16582976

>>16579990
Kill yourself, thread reported