Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 08:19:23 UTC No. 16580078
>>16580069
it's e.
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 08:33:26 UTC No. 16580082
>>16580078
Thanks and you’re right. I figured it out.
What about this one?
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 08:51:10 UTC No. 16580093
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 09:07:39 UTC No. 16580102
>>16580093
Lol. That’s right.
Try https://international-iq-test.com/e
Whats your result?
Btw theres a paywall at the end, but just refreshing the page shows me the results for free so try that.
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 09:11:42 UTC No. 16580106
>>16580102
not clicking your IP grabber faggot
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 09:40:00 UTC No. 16580127
It's too difficult!
Give us a simpler one.
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 09:52:08 UTC No. 16580132
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 11:33:28 UTC No. 16580194
either b or d
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 11:38:11 UTC No. 16580196
>>16580194
That was my first thought too after counting vertices, edges, faces, etc. But it's actually just XOR on columns, so it's e.
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 11:43:10 UTC No. 16580199
>>16580078
>>16580196
What’s the thought process? Holy shit you people must be geniuses to be able to find a logical pattern in that shit.
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 11:44:03 UTC No. 16580200
>>16580082
Is it e as well? 4 clubs and 4 spades on each column and row.
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 11:47:14 UTC No. 16580203
>>16580069
fun fact, if you do enough of these and then test your iq professionally you will score a fake higher iq
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 11:47:33 UTC No. 16580204
d
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 11:51:47 UTC No. 16580211
>>16580132
I feel like it's e. again based on the pattern in the thread. The off-diagonal seems to be flipping first the upper triangles and then the lower. Not sure, though, since the third picture on the second row would actually make more sense as the first picture on the first row.
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 11:52:05 UTC No. 16580212
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 12:00:10 UTC No. 16580219
Barkon !8v8vr3ErDk at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 12:10:27 UTC No. 16580225
F
raphael at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 12:29:27 UTC No. 16580248
>>16580082
i think b
idc my MR is 130
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 12:31:38 UTC No. 16580252
>>16580211
Yes it’s E
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 15:17:00 UTC No. 16580384
>>16580248
>i think b
the number of clubs shown:
211
121
11_
thus _ = 2 clubs
MouldMan34 at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 16:13:29 UTC No. 16580404
It's e. In every image (in vertical) order, the lines are only repeated in only 2 of the images. In the third column, there is a horizontal line in both of the images so there won't be a horizontal line in our answer which in this case is e
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 17:54:48 UTC No. 16580480
>>16580102
Buy an ad.
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 18:01:04 UTC No. 16580489
these are hard as fuck, what's the deal? no longer 0.01% of brain gpu
plplpl at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 18:17:58 UTC No. 16580501
>>16580225
There are three different exercises above.
Which one did you answer?
Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 23:41:53 UTC No. 16580757
>>16580069
this is really hard, managed to find the pattern in the first one somewhat fast enough but the middle and below ones are really complicated
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 00:27:55 UTC No. 16580786
>>16580102
>just refreshing the page shows me the results for free so try that
didnt work for me
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 06:27:46 UTC No. 16581020
>>16580069
I genuinly can't recognize a pattern in this one.
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 06:39:41 UTC No. 16581026
>>16580199
Meh, that is EZ AF. Try remote viewing, that is a lot harder but far more rewarding.
bollyn dot com at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 08:09:36 UTC No. 16581088
>>16581026
the photo in the lower right corner is incorrect
because prefix-therm*te brought WTC 2 and 1 down
not the combination of airplane impact and fuel fire
nano-thermate and micro-thermite are examples of prefix-therm*te
Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 08:15:40 UTC No. 16581092
>>16581026
"Why are you here?"
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 18:03:01 UTC No. 16582763
>>16580199
these matrices are often based on Boolean operations, usually x-or. In this case, start with the top image, xor each line with the middle image and then get the lower image.
These tests massively helps people with maths or CS degrees.
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 18:04:55 UTC No. 16582764
>>16581020
look at :
>>16580078
then examine the patterns carefully
hint: columns
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 18:07:28 UTC No. 16582769
>>16580082
this one is tricky, I can see many solutions being possible here, like this dude said here:
>>16580384
but wait why not: b?
b is found in first row, and second row, so why not in the third row again
are there more possible solutions?
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 18:56:23 UTC No. 16582821
>>16580069
God dammit it really is E. Didn't see it at first.
Top right -> middle right -> bottom right
lines without repeat stay
lines with repeat deleted
it's fucking easy but very hard if you start without the knowledge of how to do it
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 18:59:34 UTC No. 16582825
>>16582821
my veredict is that IQ tests are kind of bullshit, since you can train at them and "force" a high IQ
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 19:04:15 UTC No. 16582830
>>16580082
Also e
this one is just a count of spades and clubs, 4 of each
>>16580132
E, hard to see a pattern here but its not A or B and E is a reversal of top left, has slightly more logic working for it than C, D or F
god dammit WHY ARE THEY ALL E?!?!!
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 19:05:28 UTC No. 16582831
>>16582825
I have a bad habit of not going with my gut, and giving the wrong answer just to test silly theories about things when deep down my gut was right all along
I was able to knock out all of these ones without knowing how to do it, but my confidence was certainly a hurdle
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 19:30:53 UTC No. 16582851
>>16582821
>it's fucking easy but very hard if you start without the knowledge of how to do it
now start playing Myst
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 19:53:08 UTC No. 16582873
>>16582821
Damn. Yeah it's easy now that I see it. Maybe it's because we have trained ourselves to read these orthogonally and not vertically?
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 19:57:51 UTC No. 16582879
>>16582873
It's because you go through a 10 step process for every "theory" you have on how it ought to be solved
Go through 3 or 4 failures in theory and it's 40 steps you've gone through and it stops being "worth it" and you give up
Only the most autistic will do 100 steps
There is also an attention and short term memory element to that
Literally just brute forcing patterns in your head
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 21:24:41 UTC No. 16583005
>>16582821
>lines without repeat stay
>lines with repeat deleted
this is called XOR
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 21:25:27 UTC No. 16583006
>>16583005
Now is it more or less impressive to know the autism term for this
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 21:26:56 UTC No. 16583010
>>16583006
it's useful
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 21:28:05 UTC No. 16583011
>>16583006
XOR is a bad name for it. A better name is addition mod 2. What makes it extremely good and useful is that it forms a group. Very few binary operations form a group. AND, OR, NAND do not form a group. From the name alone you would not know how magical XOR is.
Therefore addition mod 2 is the more appropriate term for it.
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 21:30:25 UTC No. 16583016
>>16583011
No, XOR is the right name because there are only two inputs. You are trying to generalize it to N inputs when that is not what the problem entails.
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 21:31:43 UTC No. 16583019
>>16583011
>>16583010
Yeah but bruh dude understanding this shit intrinsically is far superior to needing a textbook about it
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 21:35:51 UTC No. 16583027
>>16583019
If it is capable of understanding boolean logic intrinsically how come it wasn't formalized until the 1800's?
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 21:38:32 UTC No. 16583032
>>16583027
To give it to the masses, the gifted had it the entire time.
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 21:45:26 UTC No. 16583044
>>16583032
If that was the case then shouldn't they have removed such problems from the so called "IQ" test?
Anonymous at Tue, 11 Feb 2025 21:47:21 UTC No. 16583047
>>16583044
Are you assuming IQ tests are valid?
Anonymous at Wed, 12 Feb 2025 02:25:09 UTC No. 16583317
>>16580069
This is the first one of these that's ever made me feel legitimately retarded, damn. Not a fun feeling haha
Anonymous at Wed, 12 Feb 2025 16:21:37 UTC No. 16583751
>>16583016
>XOR
the truth table for XOR
Anonymous at Wed, 12 Feb 2025 18:04:56 UTC No. 16583840
>>16580757
you're not supposed to look at them as rows, you're supposed to look at them as columns. genuinely have no idea what pattern you found in the first row.
>>16580069
i wonder what percentile solving this puts you in. shouldn't be that high, right?