Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 11:51:16 UTC No. 16580209

>>16580198
alarmist charlatans who want to syphon funding so they can keep hiding behind their desks and dont get an actual job.

defund all universities.

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 11:54:51 UTC No. 16580216

>>16580209
But do you have any sources or studies to back you up other than writing a single angry sentence? This thread has a lot of informations and resources that you could use to educate yourself or if you’re smart enough refute them all: https://www.resetera.com/threads/climate-breakdown.1094046/

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 12:28:04 UTC No. 16580245

>>16580198
25 years until nearly every human is infertile (bad scenario)
30 years to wipe out 95% of fish, sending the global ecology into an unrecoverable death spiral
35 years to wipe out the majority of birds and insects
50 years from now an area the size of continental Europe will become desert due to erosion and ecological depletion, a large amount of this was agricultural land
55 years until everybody is infertile (good scenario)
60 years to triple Africa's population, causing global food shortages, though already a problem much earlier
65 years to burn down all the rainforests
70 years to kill virtually all birds and insects

le climate and le warming are memes to farm more taxes from you that are then stuffed up rich people's assholes
the real problem is all the humans directly destroying nature by cutting it down, by poisoning, burning and otherwise killing it
nobody is trying to fix that because our democracies aren't really democracies and because our politicians are only interested in power

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 12:36:29 UTC No. 16580257

>>16580245
>because our democracies aren't really democracies
Huh? What do you mean by that? Why don’t you try living in Russia or China to see what a dictatorship really is like?

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 12:54:46 UTC No. 16580275

>>16580257
just because our system is better than russias or chinas doesnt mean that it is perfect
I'll put it in simple terms representative democracies are actually just renamed republics, which are not democracies, hence why democracies have been renamed to direct democracies
and look at the only western system integrating some measure of direct democracy: switzerland
they're doing better than everybody else
he says it well: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sylz4JnNP20&t=839s

anyhow, this is the problem, ron paul also talked about it - there is no more liberty
capitalism only sees a tree as wood and land, it doesn't care about any of its functions or long-term benefits
extend that to everything

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 13:02:04 UTC No. 16580280

>>16580198
>terrified
Of course they are, Elon is about to hunt them down.

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 13:05:55 UTC No. 16580286

>>16580216
>resetera

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 13:08:09 UTC No. 16580287

2 more weeks tops, pack it up

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 16:00:03 UTC No. 16580400

>>16580257
What are western democracies doing to lower the population? What are western democracies doing to decrease agricultural land and why hasn't it started yet? What are western democracies doing to produce a sustainable development score that doesn't factor in GDP? What are western democracies to stop Russian and Chinese influence from creeping into their territory? What are western democracies doing to convert Russia and China into environmentally conscious administrations instead of GDP sluts?

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 16:49:25 UTC No. 16580424

>>16580198
>asked what they felt
asking what they "feel" does not give useful information. it basically tells them to dispense with scientific restraint and make ideological statements.
>hopeless
>broken
>worry
>muh keeeds
>terrified
it's all so tiresome

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 17:11:39 UTC No. 16580444

When it fully comes out how retarded our modern "climate science" is, no one will trust scientists just like covid made no one trust doctors.

The real kicker is that all the calculations, all the supposed "science", is using CO2 measurements to model tempature. Because it's something we can measure from 30 thousand years ago. So OF COURSE all their calculations are telling us any raise to CO2 will raise the temperature. Because it was their original assumption all along.

When the average person realizes that every supposedly smart scientist just overlooked this obvious conflict they will lose all faith in everything every scientist has ever told them.

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 17:24:00 UTC No. 16580456

oh no, I'm so sad that we will have no more winter

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 17:33:43 UTC No. 16580463

>>16580444
I am astonished that RetractionWatch hasn't already caused this crisis in trust.

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 20:08:46 UTC No. 16580576

>>16580198
>my children
The people who keep crying about muh goymate change shoild just not have children because children are bad for the climate or something.

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 20:13:48 UTC No. 16580581

>>16580576
not having children is bad for economy

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 20:15:03 UTC No. 16580583

>>16580581
economy is bad for the climate

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 20:20:48 UTC No. 16580587

>>16580583
so?

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 20:21:50 UTC No. 16580588

>>16580587
so hurting economy is good for the climate

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 20:22:57 UTC No. 16580589

>>16580588
economy is carbon neutral, actually

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 20:33:43 UTC No. 16580598

I think we have only 5 years before global Climate Catastrophe.

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 22:28:19 UTC No. 16580702

>>16580598
Source?

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 22:28:57 UTC No. 16580703

>>16580702
99.997% of all experts said so

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 22:29:54 UTC No. 16580704

>>16580209
I've been through academia and it's this 1000000x

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 14:44:05 UTC No. 16581320

The 2030s are going to be rough