Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 18:56:22 UTC No. 16580527

Logic can't prove its axiom without creating another unproven axiom so it exists without reason much like the retards who post here.

plplpl at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 20:55:07 UTC No. 16580623

>>16580527
>the retards who post here
Well then why would Edward Witten lurk here?
A poster in another thread in /sci/ wrote, that Ed lurks here.

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 21:07:27 UTC No. 16580629

>>16580623
Can he logically prove whatever he says the reason for his existence is without relying on an unproven axiom?

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 21:24:24 UTC No. 16580655

>>16580527
You can't deny logic without using logic. It works, is reliable, and has predictive power.
>muh unproven axiom
no one cares

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 21:46:05 UTC No. 16580670

>>16580655
And how does that answer the question of OP?

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 21:59:42 UTC No. 16580681

>>16580655
I reject logic. That's all.

Anonymous at Wed, 12 Feb 2025 06:44:23 UTC No. 16583426

>>16580527
>creating another unproven axiom
Nope, you just need the law of identity for logic to need itself and since that is already a primary element of logic, no new axioms need to be created.

Anonymous at Wed, 12 Feb 2025 06:46:42 UTC No. 16583428

>>16580681
No, you explicitly used digital logic to post your nonsense to the internet, what you mean to say is that you don't comprehend logic.