Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 20:20:45 UTC No. 16580586

>>16580558
>metaphysical properties of existence
If you mean consciousness or material: those are mere labels and word games. If you mean anything above physics then you're even more retarded because anything outside of physics is a part of physics that physics hasn't discovered yet. Metaphysics is like saying meta-existence. Complete nonsense.

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 20:58:56 UTC No. 16580626

>>16580558
>metaphysical properties of existence
Not long ago sun used to be the apex of metaphysics, today it's just a ball of boiling plasma. Quantum biology makes theory of evolution sound like a fairy tale of a senile old man

Anonymous at Sun, 9 Feb 2025 21:35:32 UTC No. 16580665

>>16580586
>>16580626
>sperging over semantics
You pedant retards I'm clearly speaking about what might be going on outside of this physical reality of ours that is inaccessible to plain observation.

>anything outside of physics is a part of physics that physics hasn't discovered yet
Its very possible that we are limited to our current perception by design so it isn't as simple as "hasn't discovered yet".
For starters we can't wrap our minds around the first cause of the universe(or of whatever creator if theres one). That should be the first hint that theres something fishy going on.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 03:16:37 UTC No. 16580931

>>16580665
>what might be going on outside of this physical reality of ours that is inaccessible to plain observation.
why would you even think there is such a thing you imbecile? without such a thing being scientifically observed? anyone can make up ridiculous shit and say
>hey, it might be real
also
>That should be the first hint that theres something fishy going on.
no, that's a hint you're an idiot

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 04:52:55 UTC No. 16580973

>>16580931
>insisting on being a materialist midwit deaf to anything that doesn't involve hard evidence
Its fine anon you'll grow out of this phase like I did and realize there are questions without answers concerning this reality(and outside the realm of testable science) that are worth thinking about.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 05:01:13 UTC No. 16580978

>>16580973
that sounds like cope, you're getting older and you need something to cling on. if you can't keep it science related go meditate on >>>/x/

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 05:24:59 UTC No. 16580992

>>16580978
>you're getting older and you need something to cling on
>implying its something out of desperation
Its just basic logical sense you retard.
I don't miss my peak atheist days where I thought I was genius for being overly reductionist and dismissive about the unknown.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 05:34:16 UTC No. 16581002

>>16580992
I've been clinging on to NIH's Intervention Testing Program, but President Big Orange Retard is probably canning that shit now.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 06:15:34 UTC No. 16581017

>>16580558
You literally used the sticky image from >>>/lit/ because you know for an absolute fact that this thread belongs there instead.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 07:22:51 UTC No. 16581040

>>16580992
I'm agnostic you moron. The fact that you went there filters you.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 07:30:38 UTC No. 16581048

>>16580992
Atheists are the only ones that can stomach the unknown, theists thinks all unknowns can be explained by some magician's whims.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 07:38:23 UTC No. 16581052

>>16581017
I found it coincidentally googling for afterlife art
>also implying I want to invite discussion from pseuds who will do nothing other than defer to their favorite authors

>>16581048
Thats the point of the thread, a take on the unknown from an atheist perspective.
The issue is being a super duper atheist where you just deny anything beyond physicality.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 07:43:02 UTC No. 16581058

>>16581052
>Thats the point of the thread, a take on the unknown from an atheist perspective.
People who call your bullshit out are not all atheists. You don't get to define anything "weird" out there. Science does. You just take it when it's served. That's all there is to it.
Even if there's "magic" out there, science will characterize that bitch. And then you will find out about it.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 07:46:37 UTC No. 16581062

>>16581052
You have obviously never even bothered posting on /lit/ or don't understand that scientists also tend to write books and pseuds here tend to defer to them as well.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 07:47:26 UTC No. 16581064

>>16580558
Anon, the real cool stuff is released on /x/ because glowies don't know, and can't tell, if it is trolling, another tard thread, or the real deal.
>>16581048
LMAO

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 07:48:29 UTC No. 16581066

>>16581058
>Even if there's "magic" out there, science will characterize that bitch.
No, if it is scientifically characterized, it is not magical, once a miracle has a scientific explanation, it ceases being a miracle and starts being a natural function. Theists don't believe in complete unknowns, they believe in god's miracles.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 07:49:24 UTC No. 16581068

>>16581066
I used "magic" in quotes, for a fucking reason.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 07:53:21 UTC No. 16581072

>>16581068
>I was wrong sarcastically, so its okay for me to be retarded.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 07:58:15 UTC No. 16581077

>>16581072
it's in literal quotes you idiot

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 08:04:56 UTC No. 16581085

>>16581077
Sure keep insisting that makes you less retarded for purposely being wrong and actively acknowledging your own self-contradictions.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 10:28:29 UTC No. 16581144

>>16581085
you managed to say nothing with so many words

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 10:34:54 UTC No. 16581152

>>16581144
Only to a narcissist who refuses to acknowledge their own faults.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 10:36:00 UTC No. 16581153

>>16581152
fuck off with your original sin bullshit you brainlet

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 10:39:27 UTC No. 16581155

>>16581153
This is the first mention of that phrase, schizo, I was insulting your retarded magical thinking in general not your retarded morality psychodrama specifically.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 10:45:30 UTC No. 16581157

>>16581155
>your retarded magical thinking in general
you must be a bot of some kind. I used "magic" in quotes you dipshit, do you understand that? what the fuck is wrong with you? you some kind of religious fruitcake that is seething at agnostics bypassing your shit like nothing?

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 10:51:19 UTC No. 16581160

>>16581157
The anon who invoked the word didn't, you just put it in quotes to try to distance yourself from your implicit belief in divine magicians, but your point was still wrong, you can't explain magic since once explained it ceases to be magical.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 10:57:56 UTC No. 16581166

>>16581160
HENCE WHY IT WAS IN FUCKING QUOTES YOU IDIOT

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 11:00:04 UTC No. 16581167

>>16581166
No, you will never accept a scientific explanation to replace your preferred divine magician, that is the point, retards will always defer to magical thinking.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 11:05:55 UTC No. 16581168

>>16581167
you sound deeply broken and in need of meds

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 11:07:07 UTC No. 16581169

>>16581168
I accept your concession, its all the medication I need.