Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 10:27:03 UTC No. 16581143

>>16581140
Sure, your master is totally returning in just 2 more millenia even if we have to create a whole new calendar system to count it.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 10:31:07 UTC No. 16581146

>>16581143
>your master
That's how I and everybody here know that you're full of garbage.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 10:31:50 UTC No. 16581148

>>16581140
take this shit to >>>/x/ and >>>/lit/ where mental disease runs loose.
also meds

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 10:33:35 UTC No. 16581149

>>16581146
No, you don't know any thing, as a theist, you can only have faith in retarded shit.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 12:27:54 UTC No. 16581210

>>16581148
This only shows how unprepared you are for this discussion. Keep hiding the truth from people, atheist. You'll never be a real scientist.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 12:41:18 UTC No. 16581224

>>16581210
>atheist
no such thing. and you're still a deranged idiot

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 12:45:47 UTC No. 16581228

>>16581210
Which god invented science and where did they document it?

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 12:55:40 UTC No. 16581235

>>16581228
didn't all of them create everything?

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 13:01:04 UTC No. 16581237

>>16581140
>atheistic science

Last I checked, one can carry out the scientific method regardless whether they're going to church on Sunday or not.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 13:01:59 UTC No. 16581240

>>16581235
If so, shouldn't you be able to cite at least one ancient holy book that mentions the scientific method instead of answering a question with a much stupider question?

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 13:09:33 UTC No. 16581245

>>16581240
ah see that's implicit since they created everything. the everything part includes the scientific method.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 13:15:56 UTC No. 16581249

>>16581245
Then why do they all mention the other stuff they created if its all just implied?
Wouldn't it have made things easier if they mentioned inventing the scientific method instead of evil fruit?

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 13:21:47 UTC No. 16581255

>>16581249
how could they have come up with the name back then?

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 13:23:05 UTC No. 16581257

>>16581140
>I know things that could advance science centuries
So? Where are they? We're waiting.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 13:27:32 UTC No. 16581260

>>16581255
The same way there are names for all the other shit that was created in the bible and/or other holy books.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 13:43:45 UTC No. 16581274

>>16581260
they had the right metaphor for it. most humans want into science for power and control over other humans. the whole point is that humans cannot into knowledge responsibly and they'll fall into some traps. proven constantly throughout history.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 13:59:38 UTC No. 16581283

>>16581140
>this is how you're framing it
Pathetic. Granting more credence by mention than is deserved.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 14:00:54 UTC No. 16581285

>>16581257
he's a beLIEver, he's not going to prove you shit

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 14:12:53 UTC No. 16581294

>>16581237
Being a theist has nothing to do with attending to church on Sunday. It only means you don't deny Reality. And how to do science, real science if you deny Reality? What axioms would you use? Only false ones.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 14:46:35 UTC No. 16581323

>>16581140
magic lava!!!! theyll burn in magic lava!!!! amen.

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 15:01:51 UTC No. 16581334

>how """""""christian"""""" propaganda works in 4chins
>mock opposing group in OP
>doesn't matter if they get debunked on the first post
>just keep that post on first page
>retards "arguing" will bump the thread
>make more similar threads following this same pattern
this is how /his/ died to christianity shills btw

Anonymous at Mon, 10 Feb 2025 15:13:47 UTC No. 16581354

>>16581334
the christcuck/schizobabble threads are funny to lurk in
>>16578811