🗑️ 🧵 "science" youtuber chart
Anonymous at Wed, 12 Feb 2025 15:58:08 UTC No. 16583728
Made this in an autistic attempt to categorize science youtubers I like/dislike. I went too easy on mark rober because there is no way cgp is just as pompous as him.
Anonymous at Wed, 12 Feb 2025 18:02:55 UTC No. 16583836
>>16583728
Sam o nella doesn't claim or try to be a science youtuber, he just makes video essays on random bs for teh lulz thus not a science youtuber
Everything else is gay, science youtubing is gay.
Anonymous at Fri, 14 Feb 2025 14:35:09 UTC No. 16585745
>>16583836
What something is isn't defined by what they call themselves. Though I'd say Sam focuses more on history than science.
Anonymous at Fri, 14 Feb 2025 14:44:29 UTC No. 16585748
Cody'sLab #1
Anonymous at Fri, 14 Feb 2025 22:59:37 UTC No. 16586118
>>16585748
CodysLab more like GOATYChad #1
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Feb 2025 00:42:37 UTC No. 16586204
>>16583728
where matt parker?
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Feb 2025 01:02:06 UTC No. 16586211
>>16583728
Missing:
William Osman - slightly educational
William Osman2 - purely entertaining + humble
Thought Emporium - high pompous high educational
Steve Mould - humble high educational
NurdRage - humble high educational
NightHawkInLight - humble educational
Explosions&Fire - high humble educational & entertaining
Extractions&Ire - high humble more educational still entertaining
Applied Science - humble educational
There's a couple more I haven't got to but my language lessons are starting.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Feb 2025 01:07:03 UTC No. 16586216
>>16586204
Not a science youtuber. Which makes one wonder why 3 blue 1 brown is up there.
Better question is where's explosions and fire/extractions and ire? He's my number one source on how Australia doesn't have an ozone layer and how not to make cubane.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Feb 2025 02:40:44 UTC No. 16586254
>>16583728
ppffffft
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Feb 2025 02:55:35 UTC No. 16586260
>>16586258
TTE too high, I personally know the guy
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Feb 2025 02:55:35 UTC No. 16586261
>>16586258
>Thought Emporium
>not cringe
His stuff is good but he's the epitome of arrogant cringey nerd.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Feb 2025 03:12:20 UTC No. 16586269
>>16586261
nah, he's pretty harmless, he's a tech head
if he took himself as an authority (which he certainly is not, but he's humble about it) then it'd be cringe, but he's popsci. He doesn't go into anything high level in biology.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Feb 2025 03:17:34 UTC No. 16586271
>>16586269
He talks like an absolute reddit fag, turbo cringe
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Feb 2025 04:00:14 UTC No. 16586287
I find most of them annoying/pointless but I do enjoy suckerpinch, he does some very funny tech projects.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Feb 2025 04:03:58 UTC No. 16586291
>>16586287
the whole SIGBOVIK journal is kino, tom7 is just a small part of it
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Feb 2025 04:09:09 UTC No. 16586298
>>16586291
Sweet, I gotta check that out.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Feb 2025 04:16:41 UTC No. 16586303
>>16586298
I'd rec proceedings pre 2019, some good shitposts that arent all AI, even though ML has been in pretty much every proceeding.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Feb 2025 04:19:17 UTC No. 16586305
>>16586303
Yeah I don't have much interest in nu-AI shit.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Feb 2025 04:27:06 UTC No. 16586310
>>16586305
then stick to pre covid