Anonymous at Wed, 12 Feb 2025 18:48:50 UTC No. 16583866

>>16583865
It's a lifeless rock like the rest of outerspace

Anonymous at Wed, 12 Feb 2025 18:51:46 UTC No. 16583868

>>16583865
>>16583866
I am yet to hear or read any convincing arguments or theses on the change in thrust and significantly altered in trajectory following its fly by

Anonymous at Wed, 12 Feb 2025 18:53:58 UTC No. 16583870

>>16583868
Did the nitrogen iceberg theory get debunked?

Anonymous at Wed, 12 Feb 2025 18:59:37 UTC No. 16583876

>>16583870
>theory
So it's just as possible as the theory that it was aliens.
Either way, we'll never know, because nobody cared about it and nothing ever happens. Self-proclaimed experts will always continue to say that it was just gas all the while the inability to prove what it really was makes it a coinflip.

Anonymous at Wed, 12 Feb 2025 19:02:11 UTC No. 16583880

>>16583865
I was there recently.

It's a contact binary, one is 345x188x162 m in diameter, the other 296x204x118m.

Two bodies crashed in a 45° angle so everyone thinks it's a stick like in pic related. They're fooled though.

Material looks like coal but has a reddish tint. Like the stuff they got from Bennu or Ryugu.

Breakdown: >>16583866

Anonymous at Wed, 12 Feb 2025 19:03:51 UTC No. 16583882

>>16583865
Solar sail kick stage for alien recon ship that's inbound.

Anonymous at Wed, 12 Feb 2025 19:04:55 UTC No. 16583885

>>16583880
Contact binaries roll on the long axis?

Anonymous at Wed, 12 Feb 2025 19:10:23 UTC No. 16583888

>>16583876
One question is how much acceleration did it do compared to some theoretical alien solar sail. My impression was that it wasn't all that impressive.

Anonymous at Wed, 12 Feb 2025 20:15:33 UTC No. 16583934

>>16583865
it's Andy Sixx's log (in space)

Anonymous at Wed, 12 Feb 2025 20:18:32 UTC No. 16583941

>>16583865
It was never there.
All astronomers that reported on it are brainless, and it was strictly within margins of error that it existed at all.

I don't believe in Oumuamua, and neither should you.

If people are so retarded they can believe the Earth is flat, why does no one question Oumuamua being real except for the people who think space in it's entirety is fake?

Anonymous at Wed, 12 Feb 2025 20:19:48 UTC No. 16583945

>>16583888
Measurable, and that's enough.

Anonymous at Wed, 12 Feb 2025 21:34:19 UTC No. 16584005

>>16583865
>jewish harvard astronomer says that it's aliens
this is what convinced me that it's just a rock. thank you for clarifying this matter for me, Avi Loeb.

Anonymous at Wed, 12 Feb 2025 21:58:29 UTC No. 16584020

Anonymous at Wed, 12 Feb 2025 22:57:47 UTC No. 16584084

>>16584020
We can safely ignore it's close pass to Earth.
After all, mainstream news and scientists do.

Anonymous at Wed, 12 Feb 2025 23:14:39 UTC No. 16584099

>>16584084
>i[ts] close pass to Earth
it looks pretty close in that GIF

Anonymous at Thu, 13 Feb 2025 05:43:08 UTC No. 16584360

>>16583865
monke

Anonymous at Thu, 13 Feb 2025 06:31:36 UTC No. 16584377

>>16583866
Just an space prove looking for potential competitors that must be neutralized.

Anonymous at Thu, 13 Feb 2025 06:31:52 UTC No. 16584378

>>16583865
Everything that seems like it could be aliens just turns out to be some boring shit, so it's just more boring shit.

Anonymous at Thu, 13 Feb 2025 09:52:57 UTC No. 16584511

>>16583885
It's proven that this object tumbles. I've seen that too when I went back from a visit. A roll on the long axis is not stable enough.

Anonymous at Thu, 13 Feb 2025 10:12:48 UTC No. 16584528

>>16583865
aliens don't need to hide in a rock and do a flyby

Anonymous at Thu, 13 Feb 2025 10:29:26 UTC No. 16584538

>>16584099
Coincidence. Now stop talking about it.