🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Feb 2025 11:25:36 UTC No. 16584593
What's the scientific proof those things are suns again?
Barkon !8v8vr3ErDk at Thu, 13 Feb 2025 11:26:36 UTC No. 16584594
This photo of the sky is a shop. All you see in reality is black space and yellow stars. These pink colours are shops.
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Feb 2025 16:01:33 UTC No. 16584849
>>16584593
Spectroscopy.
you can isolate a star, check its light on a spectrograh and this tells you what its made of.
we first tested it on our Sun. the experiments match up
thats all we got, really
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Feb 2025 16:04:16 UTC No. 16584853
>>16584593
Those things? What is the scientific proof those things exist in the first place? I have never seen more than a handful stars in the sky.
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Feb 2025 22:34:19 UTC No. 16585197
>>16584853
you have shit skies over there huh? never traveled to anywhere without light pollution and a clear sky?
Anonymous at Thu, 13 Feb 2025 22:36:57 UTC No. 16585202
>>16584593
Local sunscreen sales numbers.
Anonymous at Fri, 14 Feb 2025 01:57:44 UTC No. 16585370
>>16584849
A ball of plasma in a lab also checks out on the spectroscopy. But that aren't a sun.
How do people know for sure those things are giant gas balls really far away and not something small really near?
Anonymous at Fri, 14 Feb 2025 14:05:06 UTC No. 16585737
>>16585370
>How do people know for sure those things are giant gas balls really far away and not something small really near?
Here, make yourself a bit more knowledgeable.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YdO
Anonymous at Fri, 14 Feb 2025 14:59:26 UTC No. 16585757
>>16585737
That's talking about our own sun. There is the luxury of an eclipse to triangulate the distance.
Unfortunately the part about stars is in part 2 which isn't out yet.
Anonymous at Fri, 14 Feb 2025 15:17:00 UTC No. 16585767
>>16585169
>low res camera
also explain the southern stars if the earth is flat
Anonymous at Fri, 14 Feb 2025 15:18:20 UTC No. 16585768
>>16585737
Was it such a genius idea? Counting it all out without a computer is a fuck, don't get me wrong. But I feel like when you work with a lot of data problems with comparable solutions arise pretty often and you don't call yourself Einstein for solving those. Minus all the manual counting (which I would probably fail miserably at to be fair).
Anonymous at Fri, 14 Feb 2025 16:25:25 UTC No. 16585812
>>16584593
What's the proof that those things aren't suns again?
Anonymous at Fri, 14 Feb 2025 16:28:52 UTC No. 16585818
>>16585812
Bible says there's only one sun. What more do you need?
Anonymous at Fri, 14 Feb 2025 16:31:15 UTC No. 16585821
>>16585818
Got a book that isn't jewish that I can cross check that with?
Anonymous at Fri, 14 Feb 2025 16:48:44 UTC No. 16585833
>>16585812
That's not how science work
Anonymous at Fri, 14 Feb 2025 18:59:13 UTC No. 16585926
>>16585370
We know they're not really near because of parallax. If they were close by and small, their direction in the sky would change a lot as we swing around the sun. We know they're all at least several lightyears away because they don't move much in the sky throughout the year.
Anonymous at Fri, 14 Feb 2025 21:33:52 UTC No. 16586047
>>16584593
It really annoys me that I had to figure out on my own, as an adult, that OP's picrel is actually the center of our own galaxy. Really seems like something my asshole teachers should've taught me back in elementary school.
Anonymous at Fri, 14 Feb 2025 22:08:42 UTC No. 16586084
>>16586047
need for blood indeed, couldn't agree more with your whole post
Anonymous at Fri, 14 Feb 2025 22:30:01 UTC No. 16586095
>>16585370
>and not something small really near?
different techniques depending on the distance, basically parallax, doesnt work for stars really far away but that still tells you the object would be far away. This tells you it cant be small.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Feb 2025 00:43:32 UTC No. 16586205
>>16585926
>>16586095
Objects immersed in fluid also produce an apparent parallax effect.
If one does not know or consider that the object is viewed through a medium with a different refractive index, they might interpret the visual distortion as a change in actual distance.
Anonymous at Sat, 15 Feb 2025 07:11:26 UTC No. 16586417
>>16584853
https://youtu.be/CJ5OpCDVmaI