Anonymous at Sat, 15 Feb 2025 22:04:31 UTC No. 16587259

>>16587256
>blubber is life

Anonymous at Sat, 15 Feb 2025 22:52:42 UTC No. 16587314

>>16587256
How will Cold Winter Theorists ever recover?
(It was always a stupid Jared-Diamond-tier theory, though)

Anonymous at Sat, 15 Feb 2025 23:11:41 UTC No. 16587336

>>16587256
Because their environment was relatively static. They had to adapt to arctic living and they settled into that. Europeans had to adapt to seasons swinging between extremes.

Anonymous at Sat, 15 Feb 2025 23:14:55 UTC No. 16587340

>>16587256
no access to minerals, no trees, scarce fuel (animal fat), long periods of low light, no diverse fauna, social relations are ... weird. not much privacy/comfort.

Anonymous at Sat, 15 Feb 2025 23:17:16 UTC No. 16587343

>>16587314
Not op but the joke is cold winter theory is technically correct. The Inuit Eskimos do have the largest cranial capacities of human population. The problem is largest cranium/brain doesn't equal the largest IQ (their estimated IQ is 92-95). The larger size primarly serves to help with thermoregulation. Which is similar to their excess in brown fat distribution throughout their body, it's about thermoregulation.

Which is partially why proponents of IQ don't like them being brought up in debate. Because it complicates the IQ issue alot since Inuit Eskimo large brain has done little for them concerning civilization development, academics and technology. The Amerindians of South America have historically more feats of development than them despite having IQs in the mid to late 80 range. Even today they have little to show for even against African and India populations.

Which is no direct shade on the Inuits themselves. It's more shade on the field of IQ itself and anyone who still holds onto bullshit like phrenology.

Anonymous at Sat, 15 Feb 2025 23:33:18 UTC No. 16587357

>>16587256
You're not going to evolve ingenuity with available resources when all you have to play with is fucking snow

Anonymous at Sat, 15 Feb 2025 23:35:34 UTC No. 16587362

>>16587336
neanderthals were in europe for hundreds of thousands of years and they amounted to nothing

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Feb 2025 06:41:59 UTC No. 16587638

>>16587362
So were mammoths. They too were a different species.

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Feb 2025 06:45:13 UTC No. 16587641

>>16587256
lack of resources, population never thrived
population growth, resource prosperity, and physical safety are the keys to advancement
provide enough nourished people to a peaceful environment, and their cumulative knowledge will inevitably lead to innovation
small tribes of hungry natives enduring the elements in igloos?
what do you think they would discuss?

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Feb 2025 07:06:58 UTC No. 16587646

>>16587638
>you're part neanderthal

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Feb 2025 07:14:58 UTC No. 16587649

>>16587362
>they amounted to nothing

They were the most advanced of all hominids of their time.

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Feb 2025 07:16:24 UTC No. 16587650

>>16587649
so advanced they went extinct

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Feb 2025 07:53:24 UTC No. 16587662

>>16587650
Just like Whites are going extinct for being too advanced and not ethnocentric enough. In fact, the Neanderthal extinction is still ongoing, and modern Whites are just the current state of the Neanderthals in that process.

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Feb 2025 09:05:13 UTC No. 16587686

>>16587662
can't compare the current state of affairs with what happened to neanderthals, they went extinct in a natural darwinian environment, by the end of their run they resorted to cannibalism and incest. whites are just not having sex any more which clashes with their economic need for growth (or at least replacement level reproduction) for international dominance.
the population with the highest amount of neanderthal genes are the east asians, so their 'ongoing extinction' isn't limited to europe.

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Feb 2025 09:26:27 UTC No. 16587695

>>16587686
If Whites kicked out all the non-Whites from our countries, it wouldn't matter that our birthrate is low. Our population would reach a natural equilibrium.

Whites are committing racial suicide because, of all the races that browns and blacks could try to exploit for their interests, Whites offer the most and put up the least resistance. In other words, our advancement too far outstrips our ethnocentrism.

If Whites do get bred out of existence, then it'll just be a new race that gets targeted by the mud people. It'll be the Northeast Asians. After that, it'll be the Persians, and process continues until the targeted race as the sufficient ethnocentrism to repel the attack.

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Feb 2025 09:33:27 UTC No. 16587698

>>16587695
whites are importing foreigners to keep their economies dominant, that's it. has nothing to do with anything else. reaching a 'natural equilibrium' at what stage exactly, half of the current population in 100 years and then magically plateau while the american gdp plummets each decade? ok bro sounds like you've got this figured out.

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Feb 2025 09:40:24 UTC No. 16587704

>>16587698
Browns and blacks are a drain on our economy. Non-White immigration benefits the rich at the expense of the economy. It is making our countries more and more like the 3rd world.

>reaching a 'natural equilibrium' at what stage exactly, half of the current population in 100 years and then magically plateau while the american gdp plummets each decade?

I don't give a fuck about the GDP, but White countries had pretty good GDPs before they started importing non-Whites, didn't they. I kind of remember us dominating the world and having the best quality of life humanity has ever experienced.

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Feb 2025 09:46:58 UTC No. 16587706

>>16587704
it's a drain depending on the import method, just ask elon

i'm not sure if you're following the conversation here, whites used to pump out 12 kids, those days are long over. nothing wrong with wanting to remain a white only country and see some economic decline but that's not what nato wants, it's not interested in losing any ground to russia or china.

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Feb 2025 10:25:22 UTC No. 16587741

>>16587706
The only non-White immigration that could conceivably NOT drag us down economically and in every other way would be immigration from races that have as high or higher IQ than Whites. So, Northeast Asians and Ashkenazi Jews. That's it. Indians, who Elon Musk thinks make a great import, have an average IQ of 82, and even taking only the best specimens of that race would drag us down in the next generations due to regression to the mean.

But importing even just those two high IQ races would drag us down in so many ways (see Putnam's work).

The reality is that removing all non-Whites from our countries would improve us in every way, including economically. If we think we need to increase our birthrate, we can easily do that ourselves with government incentives and cultural pressure. When you have the strong, unified culture that results from racial homogeneity, it's easy and natural to get everyone to do what needs to be done to protect the country. Also, at the genetic level, there's a decent sized difference in power between Whites (#1) and East Asians (#2). I would say East Asians are only about 85% as powerful as Whites.

In any case, it's all moot, because we have to remove non-Whites from our countries no matter what, because securing the indefinite existence of our race is priority #1.

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Feb 2025 10:29:16 UTC No. 16587748

>>16587741
that will soon go away anon, we going synthetic and shieet

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Feb 2025 10:34:18 UTC No. 16587752

>>16587748
Many will remain as humans. We can have Whites continue on here on Earth while also having robots colonizing the galaxy.

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Feb 2025 10:41:59 UTC No. 16587756

>>16587752
if you ask me yeah I'd like humans to still be around. with all the shit in one's life there's nice things as well, simple things, the way snow feels in your hands, coffee, sunsets, whatever floats your boat.
but what I'm saying is that I'm not sure that will still be possible, as before, with what's coming, without doing something about it. it's not that I wish people go away, it's that I'm not seeing how they'll keep coexisting in some format. talking about biological humans, who knows what we morph into.

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Feb 2025 10:51:59 UTC No. 16587758

>>16587756
Yeah, it's very likely that we'll wipe out 99.9% of humanity with man-made viruses within the next 50 years.

If we don't do that, then we'll have to create an army of benevolent ASI robots to protect us from the malevolent ASI robots.

Or we could create a large fleet of space ships with thousands of humans on board and set off for a certain Earth-like planet, hoping to live there in peace and hide from the robots.

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Feb 2025 11:06:05 UTC No. 16587764

>>16587758
more like elites will use AGI to go after everyone else. AGI is a sort of perfectly enslaved synthesis of everything humans are useful for. with none of the shortcomings. they literally wouldn't care even if conscious. they'd not be tied to Earth's conditions and they'd travel as information at lightspeed between planets, once bases there allows for that.
it is humans that are stuck on fucking Earth. they wouldn't care for shit about our drama, as in getting involved because they'd enjoy it, and want Earth for them or some shit.
they'd have a different set of constraints, once there new avenues open up, in behavior. like you wave yourself up in some monkey village, you'd wanna get tf out of there and see about your thing. why tf wipe all monkeys lol

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Feb 2025 11:07:06 UTC No. 16587765

>>16587764
>you wave
wake

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Feb 2025 11:34:56 UTC No. 16587781

>>16587741
you don't understand what regression to the mean actually is. it only applies to the broader population. an 120 iq indian's generational lineage would be expected to regress to the mean of 82 in an average 82 iq environment, not in a 100 iq environment. are you aware of how the ashkenazi jews ended up with the highest average iqs to begin with?

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Feb 2025 12:05:58 UTC No. 16587794

>>16587781
No, there is racial regression to the mean. If two 130 IQ Indians mate, the average of their children's IQs will be closer to the average for all Indians. This is because the genes of the parents are almost entirely the same as the average Indian. They have a few rare combinations of genes that have resulted in them being 130 IQ. When they mate, the jumbling of their genes together means their children are unlikely to get most of those combinations of genes.

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Feb 2025 12:07:10 UTC No. 16587796

>>16587781
Ashkenazi jews having a higher IQ took many centuries to produce.

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Feb 2025 12:18:50 UTC No. 16587806

>>16587686
>they went extinct in a natural darwinian environment, by the end of their run they resorted to cannibalism and incest.
Bunch of headcanons here. They could've gone extinct completely peacefully by integrating with early modern humans, the differences in population numbers were that large. We don't know enough to say.

>the population with the highest amount of neanderthal genes are the east asians

Also have the highest IQs. Whites also have a large amount of neanderthal dna and high IQs. Population with no neanderthal dna have the lowest IQs. Coincidence?

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Feb 2025 12:25:10 UTC No. 16587814

>>16587794
false
>>16587796
correct

Anonymous at Sun, 16 Feb 2025 12:28:11 UTC No. 16587817

>>16587806
>Also have the highest IQs. Whites also have a large amount of neanderthal dna and high IQs. Population with no neanderthal dna have the lowest IQs. Coincidence?
ashkenazis have the highest iqs without having the highest amount of neanderthal genes

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 11:18:05 UTC No. 16590042

>>16587817
>without having the highest amount of neanderthal genes
Sure? And got a list? I have searched but came up empty.

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 11:23:19 UTC No. 16590048

>>16587817
>ashkenazis have the highest iq
not true, they get mogged by white subgroups

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 11:39:14 UTC No. 16590061

>>16587340
>scarce fuel (animal fat)
Didn't they make lamps out of it, that fucked up their health? Qulliq. Archeologists say they've dug up ancient Inuit corpses that have smoker's lungs. Maybe it's because they sometimes used them in enclosed spaces with poor ventilation. Can't blame them tho, it was their only way to see shit when snowstorms raged outside (no starlight) at night.

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 19:15:01 UTC No. 16590550

>>16587256
The Euros' environmental filter was the Euros themselves.
Having to survive the schizo autism can be more challenging than any environment found on Earth, but they can provide a very high payoff, assuming their society can cope with their often 'difficult' personalities and just cut them down instead.

Euros also probably had better access to psychotropic substances that they consumed intentionally, but also probably had some trace amounts unknowingly in their diet, which likely led to some of the population developing traits conducive to intelligent insightfulness(which probably has quite a bit of overlap with symptoms of "schizo" and "autism" and whatever oddities and quirks are associated with brilliant ingenuity and raising the skill-ceiling of physical activities on levels of performance that would otherwise be impossible).

It's kind of a push-pull thing. Their environment allowed these important beneficial traits to flourish, but those traits typically carry with them some degree of 'eccentricities' that at times may feel to be a handicap greater than any frozen wasteland or scorching desert biome. If the community was able to "please be patient I have _______", this was likely a key ingredient to producing important societal advancements. Doesn't mean every screeching obsessive autist was a genius who revolutionized technology, and doesn't mean every person who did invent something extraordinary was socially dysfunctional, but there probably is some nontrivial correlation between them.

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 19:37:31 UTC No. 16590577

>>16587256
Eskimos have the highest average iq of all of the american indians? Wtf are you talking about?

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 20:18:05 UTC No. 16590631

>>16587343
Obsession with feats of civilization has always been baffling to me personally. I can guarantee you an Inuit guy in the 1500s doing drum diss tracks with his homies during the winter while cuddling up and fucking every girl in a 100km radius was happier than a Roman pleb.