🧵 So what are then the legitimate fields of physics?
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 03:31:27 UTC No. 16588722
What is correct and what is junk?
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 03:46:11 UTC No. 16588738
>>16588722
metaphysics
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 03:49:07 UTC No. 16588743
>>16588722
Applied physics (engineering)
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 04:09:39 UTC No. 16588754
>>16588722
legitimate
>very narrow chunk of modern HEP theory concerned with actual properties of matter and putting QFT on rigorous mathematical foundations (AQFT, FQFT)
illegitimate
>string cultists pretending their amateur math is physics
>astrolets pretending their kindergarten scribbles is math
>engineerlets who larp as physicists because they have “quantum” or “plasma” or “condensed matter” or “atomic, molecular, optical” in their job titles
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 04:15:11 UTC No. 16588758
>what is junk?
sabine's videos and opinions
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 04:25:53 UTC No. 16588764
>>16588758
Do not disrespect my Goddess or I'll beat you up, you pencil necked dweeb.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 04:37:44 UTC No. 16588777
>>16588722
All of the standard ones that you first learn about.
>Classical mechanics
>Waves
>Acoustics (as short and boring as that is)
>Thermodynamics (and Statistical Thermodynamics)
>Electrodynamics
>Light
>Special relativity
The grifter subjects are
>Anything with the word 'Quantum' in it
>General relativity
>Everything to do with string theory
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 04:58:02 UTC No. 16588799
>>16588777
Based
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 05:21:39 UTC No. 16588822
>>16588743
>Applied physics (engineering)
>>16588754
>illegitimate
>engineerlets who larp as physicists because they have “quantum” or “plasma” or “condensed matter” or “atomic, molecular, optical” in their job titles
Can you guys stop confusing me?
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 05:26:55 UTC No. 16588823
>>16588822
The first post you replied to is an engineerlet who would sell his mother if he found out she’s a useless whore with no real world applications.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 06:22:10 UTC No. 16588863
>>16588722
>>16588738
>>16588743
>>16588754
>>16588758
>>16588764
Sabine: buy an add you disingenuous grifting hag.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 08:00:34 UTC No. 16588926
>>16588822
If electrical or mechanical engineers don't use it, it's useless junk.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 08:10:19 UTC No. 16588938
>>16588754
>(AQFT, FQFT)
those have been failures too
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 08:11:19 UTC No. 16588939
physics students are mostly morons who don't know much besides QFT. For those drones, if there is something incomplete from a theory, then it means there is a new particle somewhere. Those idiots have made up hundreds of particles so far and they are still looking for more. That's the entirety of their intellectual framework. LOL. And btw, the job is shit. HEP is really just computing feynman diagrams to some retarded orders in terms of h_bar. It's just computer stuff and 0% physics.
Since the LHC is the biggest DUD in the history of physics, those morons fear they got exposed. So what did they do? they said they wanted 100 billions this time to build a bigger LHC, and to achieve what? discovering new particles LOL.
It is just putting ones head in the sand at this point
even on a global scope, theoretical physics is pretty much dead. Zero innovation since the discovery of the CMB.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 10:28:06 UTC No. 16589063
>>16588938
In what sense? That they don’t include the interaction picture? That says more about the interaction picture than the theories themselves.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 15:02:02 UTC No. 16589270
>>16588939
How would you fix the physics curriculum?
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 15:52:21 UTC No. 16589297
atomists are the new gender students
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 20:11:18 UTC No. 16589493
>>16588722
According to Sabine? The legitimate fields are the ones she likes, the rest are illegitimate psudoscience that literally steals research funding from the other physics fields
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 06:27:59 UTC No. 16589893
>>16589493
She's unironically right.