Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 06:24:45 UTC No. 16588867

>>16588855
gtfo retard

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 06:34:10 UTC No. 16588875

>>16588867
I think we can measure it but I’m not sure what an appropriate unit be for the Y axis. “Level of science” seems too nebulous and arbitrary.

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 06:37:01 UTC No. 16588878

wheres the trump dark age on this graph

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 06:37:21 UTC No. 16588879

The Christian dark age more or less coincided with the Islamic golden age. Science didn't stop, it just moved. Also lol at the jewdates.

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 06:53:45 UTC No. 16588891

>>16588879
Ya, moved right on the X axis about 1000 years

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 08:35:14 UTC No. 16588966

>>16588855
chat, is this real

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 09:01:06 UTC No. 16588990

>Christian institutions preserve human knowledge during the dark ages while the rest of society collapses
>Get blamed for the lack of advancement during the time they were preserving knowledge
Amazing how ungrateful the world can be. If it wasn't for Christian institutions like monasteries, what little we know about the dark ages, and the times before it, would be lost.

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 09:07:38 UTC No. 16588999

>>16588855
Yes it was definitely christianity and not the black plague that caused the dark ages.

And it was definitely enlightened, high-IQ atheists painting all those pictures of God on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel during the Renaissance.

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 12:44:07 UTC No. 16589190

>>16588855
>>16588966
Stop being so disingenuous.
Here is the correct chart.

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 13:37:10 UTC No. 16589228

I wish I was an ignorant peasant in the dark ages with a house, tons of land and a tradfamily

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 18:40:14 UTC No. 16589424

>>16589228
would you be okay with only bathing a few times a year? Perhaps they got used to smell not knowing anything different.

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 19:04:12 UTC No. 16589440

>>16588855
Other continents got a 1000-year head start because Europeans were stuck with Christianity, and Europeans still ended up dominating the rest of the planet? Based take.

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 19:11:09 UTC No. 16589447

>>16589440
We are talking about human history here, not the bugussy, Be sensible anon

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 08:51:21 UTC No. 16589952

Look at some of historian Gunnar Heinsohn's research on the "history" of the dark ages.
https://www.q-mag.org/gunnar-heinsohns-latest.html
https://www.q-mag.org/gunnar-heinsohns-latest.html#y2odNUON

According to his research most of the so called first millenium was simply invented with history of rome recorded three times by using contemporary records from different areas but claiming them to be successive.

He relies primarily on archaeological, architechtural and soil structure analysis to propose this theory. He points to evidence of a great environmental catastrophe that levelled civilisation all the way from scandinavia to egypt that appears to have been written out of history.

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 09:54:25 UTC No. 16589981

>>16589952
Cumulative mandela effect.

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 10:02:43 UTC No. 16589992

>>16589981
no, it's just a coverup by the cult of rome and related jesuit orders

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 10:10:53 UTC No. 16590003

>>16589992
*probably

It's like we have history as in what really happened with one specific event following another but then they created this timeline in I think the 1600s where various groups tried to determine where everything fit together.
Look at Isaac Newton's work many aren't aware that he researched the historic chronology topic and proposed his own very different timeline.of events.
It's not till the 1000s that people really started to have a firm enough records of events.
Heihnsohn suspected that what might have transpired is that the AD system was actually based on the custom of the founding date of a city such as rome and then there was some sort crossed wire and people started thinking it was the birth date of jesus

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 21:23:57 UTC No. 16590716

>>16590003
Sounds Eurocentric. Does he corroborate it with any Islamic or Chinese timekeeping?

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 05:33:26 UTC No. 16591118

>>16589424
Just live close to a river like most people did. You are dumber than an inbred peasant.

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 11:27:25 UTC No. 16591320

>>16590716
I suspect that's just my personal bias and interpretation of his work.

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 11:42:45 UTC No. 16591338

Why is the Roman period so steep? There was not so much scientific advancement then. Engineering maybe, but as for discovering new truths about the world I don't think they were much faster than ancient Greeks.

Why the Middle Ages dip so deep? Some knowledge was lost, but most of it was preserved by Christian and Islamic monasteries after the fall of Roman Empire. Christian institutions were the where the knowledge and education was available, other than that people mostly didn't give a shit. Attributing slower scientific advancement to Christianity alone is misguided, although the fact that doctors of The Church sucked Plato's cock and took from him the belief that experimenting is stupid and you just need to think very hard didn't help.

Anonymous at Fri, 21 Feb 2025 11:42:59 UTC No. 16594679

>>16591338
>Why the Middle Ages dip so deep?
It was a benighted theocracy.

Anonymous at Sun, 23 Feb 2025 01:48:16 UTC No. 16596967

>>16588855
christianity in it's early century was a brown proto-thirdworldist ideology but eventually deformed into something else that was arguably a bit better but still bad. the thirdwordist christianity i would say it barely dented the progress of man (which is still invariably bad) but later christianity didn't do much to change anything majorly and might have even helped things. sexual repression is not proportional to not progressing as a society.