Image not available

320x180

IMG_8465.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16588876

What is it really like to have an extremely high IQ? (160+)

Anonymous No. 16588882

lonely

Anonymous No. 16588884

>>16588876
you study any field even at the surface level and instantly catch shit other people can't.

Anonymous No. 16588986

Tastyfish supposedly was part of Mensa and has an IQ of 148 or something:
https://notabug.org/drummyfish/my_text_data/src/master/medical.txt
www.tastyfish.cz
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5nRgLt4O9ESplhI7EpgFDA
He went from normal guy, who plays in a band and has friends and family to somebody, who lives in a caravan in the woods and rambles about suckless software. I admire him from my heart and think he is right about a lot of things he says, but from a normalfag's perspective it's quite sad and he clearly suffers a lot, probably due to his high IQ and his conclusions.

Anonymous No. 16588991

>>16588986
What does the Mensa gaming club have to do with anything?

Anonymous No. 16589000

>>16588991
Because they do IQ tests?

Anonymous No. 16589140

>>16588882
Yes.

Anonymous No. 16589147

>>16588876
How am I supposed to know. I have less than half of that

Image not available

395x613

e.png

Anonymous No. 16589258

>>16588876
You are always told you're wrong. People are always confused, scared, perplexed, delirious, angry, sad about your decisions.

But you always end up winning. They dont understand and cannot understand.

Image not available

620x835

bkcjf.jpg

Anonymous No. 16589284

>>16588882
I'm just shy of 160 and married with a normal social life. The misconception that high intelligence is associated with social alienation is a cope by normies. To maintain an illusion of cosmic justice, normies convince themselves that extraordinary ability comes at the cost of some deficiency, like poor social skills or mental illness. They believe that the qualities individuals are endowed with must be, on net, distributed in an egalitarian fashion. They can't bear the reality that some people are simply better than them.

Anonymous No. 16589337

>>16589258
>You are always told you're wrong.
This. People actually think you're retarded because of communication gap.

Anonymous No. 16589339

>>16589284
>160
>and married with a normal social life.
You're a fucking idiot. You are not at the 99.99th percentile of intelligence. There's like 500,000 people on the entire planet with that IQ or greater. Also, because of the small sample size the higher the IQ range, the more theoretical and inaccurate it becomes. Anyone that claims over 145 is usually full of shit.

Anonymous No. 16589344

>>16589339
You see how much this triggers people? I am profoundly intelligent, socially well-adjusted, handsome, athletic, an excellent singer and musician, and I enjoy a lucrative career. It can't be. It's just too much for the average person to bear, psychologically. There must be some cosmic punishment to compensate for my extraordinary abilities. But there isn't. The worst thing you can say about me is that I'm a bit absent-minded and forgetful when I retreat into the stimulating inner-world of my thoughts.

Anonymous No. 16589346

>>16589284
>I'm just shy of 160
If you really were, you would understand that no two distinct lives are identical, and that the related experiences vary greatly.
You wouldn't infer a broad generalization solely based on your own personal observations because you would know that those conclusions, even though they would ring true to you, would only be a reflection of your own biases, and as such would be a fallacious reasoning unworthy of your mental abilities.
You also wouldn't reply that by virtue of superior IQ, one would easily overcome any social attrition, since you would be aware that one's psychological landscape is not only shaped by rational thoughts, but is also dependent on affective and emotional factors which are often probematic to assess and/or manage due to their overwhelming subjective nature.
But what do I know? Maybe you just wanted to vent your contempt on a cambodian stamp collection board, maybe you want to revive trolling as an art, maybe you're just a asshole, I don't care, /sci/ is just dead to me. What the hell am I doing here? I don't belong here.

Anonymous No. 16589355

>>16589000
They do pass/fail tests and do not calculate scores. The online tests from Scandinavian chapters that give scores are not valid for any purpose other than amusement.

Anonymous No. 16589358

>>16589346
I don't claim that there aren't profoundly gifted people who suffer from social alienation and/or mental disorders. I'm countering the "broad generalization" that highly intelligent people necessarily have these deficiencies. There is a general conception in our culture that intelligence is both a gift and a curse. This idea is psychologically satisfying to average people, who envy intelligence, but it doesn't necessarily correspond to reality.

Anonymous No. 16589359

>>16589344
I agree with then notion that genetics usually comes in packages and if you are deficit in one department, you probably are in others too, BUT IQ was invented to filter out mentally retarded people from the military, not to measure 99.99% genius intelligence. The scale is just not made for extreme outliers and in particular not for extremely smart people. Maybe invent your own measurement if you are so smart.

Anonymous No. 16589369

>>16589344
You are a fucking retarded idiot if you think you have an IQ of 160. Anything over 145 is pseudoscience.

Anonymous No. 16589391

>>16589344
I agree with your point about smart people usually being good at everything else too, including being charismatic, since that is also my experience with them. However, I also agree with the other anon calling your IQ out. To even calibrate an IQ test to be able to test for an IQ of 160 without extrapolation would require a dataset that includes at least a handful of people scoring that high, and that'd require hundreds of thousands of people. An organisation like Mensa would have access to that many test takers, but they suffer from a massive sample selection bias. The best data comes from military testing, but their problem is that the military is not really interested in whether someone's IQ is 145 or 160, and such people simply get perfect scores. It's possible that your IQ is 160, but I doubt any test actually told you so.

Anonymous No. 16589400

>>16588876
you're perpetually solving puzzles to avoid slipping into schizophrenia
at that level of pattern recognition you start to see absurd correlations in reality and become a true maniac if you don't find something to distract yourself with

Anonymous No. 16589404

>>16589400
i wrote this before i read the thread and immediately saw >>16588986 lmao
+validation

>>16588876
you also simulate things to completion before other individuals might even begin to understand them
for example, in the movie the matrix, when neo is plugged into a training simulation and improves his fighting skills against morpheus, it wasn't reality, but he benefited from the simulation
if your mind is powerful enough, you can do this as well
baki's "imagination training" is another relatively similar example
your imagination capabilities become so large that you can effectively do something in your mind, and benefit in terms of physical skill, as if you did it in real life, as long as you remain honest with how you imagine it
this is why nikola tesla said something along the lines of "everything is visualization", he was correct
most people are excited to pursue things because they want to discover what it's like to accomplish the thing they're pursuing
intelligent people accurately simulate things before they finish them, ended up bored when the outcome is exactly as they expected, and disappointed when the effect it has on their reality isn't as large as they would have hoped

Anonymous No. 16589751

>>16588876
what's it really like to be a dumbass?
only empaths know

Anonymous No. 16589752

You come off less retarded

Anonymous No. 16589781

>>16589358
On the contrary, the general opinion is that all gifted people should effortlessly coast through life.
What triggers people is the presumed absence of work for the maximum outcome, a bit like winning the lottery.
As this goes against the grain of the social norm, when any gain should be hard-earned, it challenges the legitimacy of being intelligent.

Anonymous No. 16589799

>>16589284
Many highly intelligent people do struggle with socialization, regardless of your own experience.
It is not a deficiency - average people would struggle in an environment filled with 60 IQ apes.
The problem is merely the chance of meeting like-minded people and especially women, thanks to higher variance in men, being drastically lower at high deviations from the norm.
High intelligence is evidence of efficient brain function, negatively correlated with mental illness and positively with reaction time.
But at the end of the day, you'll have to live inside your own head, or on the internet, when you have nobody to have a stimulating conversation with.

Anonymous No. 16590544

>>16588882
You're stupid.
I thrive in any social situation. Stupid people are exhausting and they mistake wealth and status for intelligence. My best friend groups have always been poor people like musicians and artists. Rich people are the fakest retards you'll ever meet and if someone makes a point of telling you their IQ or brags about their education: they're dunning kruger and not worth hanging out with.

Anonymous No. 16590551

>>16589284
Based smartie.
Most people mistake status with intelligence.
t. 160
>>16589339
>>16589346
>>16589799
Lack of brevity is a hallmark of low IQ. Look at the triggered midwits coping.

Anonymous No. 16590554

>>16588876
You have to have a high IQ to understand the common frame of reference.

Anonymous No. 16590558

>>16589781
Gifted people do coast through life.
They just don't define success in the context of group think. Normies think smart people worship social status and wealth (like normies) but smart people don't so retards and midwits rarely recognize an intelligent person when they see one (which is usually intentional on the smart persons part).

John Puzzle No. 16590565

Nibbas here be claiming 160 most likely got it from:
1) a test that used standard deviation 24
2) a test that uses the mental age model
3) some garbage online test with shitty norms.

I'm also tired of the stereotypes. Being highly gifted doesn't imply you will have autism or other kinds of disorders.
Some of you will likely self diagnosed like geniuses just because you could do calculus in middle school and had no friends.

Also, Chris langan's IQ is most likely between 150-170 sd 15. His mega score is impressive, but that test potentially measures more than just classical G and the norms are highly inflated. Honestly, some of the numerical sequences there are just cretinous.

Anonymous No. 16590572

>>16588876
Langan is nowhere near even 130. You can tell from his incompetent writing.

Anonymous No. 16590670

>>16590551
>Lack of brevity is a hallmark of low IQ.
More like the inability to develop a coherent argumentation.
And btw, gifted people NEVER need to brag about their IQ.

Anonymous No. 16590679

>>16588876
Everyone is a retard. Even the high-IQ retards are retards.
As a high-IQ retard (165+), I can say that it was so absolutely noisy as fuck in here that I had to shut everyone up with meds.
Quiet retards are easier to handle than screeching retards regardless of IQ.

Anonymous No. 16590701

Either there is a communication gap or there is no communication gap.
If there is, how do easy socialization and communication gap fit together?
If there isn't, are normies conversations fulfilling to you?
Call it, brainlords, I want to know.

Image not available

200x218

bill-murray-drink....gif

Anonymous No. 16590718

>>16590701
I stopped correcting them or explaining why they are wrong every two minutes.
Now I make this face.

Image not available

350x350

1691941244127490.gif

Anonymous No. 16590723

>>16588876

Anonymous No. 16590754

>>16589258
this fucks with your head tho

Anonymous No. 16590765

>>16590754
If you can ground your beliefs in something, you can go against the entire world and come out on top

Anonymous No. 16590772

>>16589258
>>16590754
>>16590765
If normies have even the slightest bit of doubt or misunderstanding while interacting with a very intelligent person, they will assume they are getting tricked and react with extreme emotion and distrust.
Betrayal is perhaps the strongest emotional experience we are capable of.

Anonymous No. 16590774

>>16590772
Thats why you dont base your reality upon what others see it, but what you see it and always validate it with ground truth. If you sacrifice truth for social cohesion, like normies do regularly, you are deluding yourself and making a fool of yourself.

Anonymous No. 16590786

>>16590774
It's mainly an issue for children and adolescents.
They generally don't have the luxury of disagreeing with adults for a lack of cynism and the power dynamics of their environments.
Without going too much into it, I've seen some shit, anon.

Image not available

449x340

16988262982990.jpg

Anonymous No. 16591112

I wouldn't know, I don't think I have that IQ. But I have also never met someone smarter than me, so either the same woes as other normal people have, or hiding away in some basement because interacting with society is impossible. I choose to believe it's the second option because it's funnier.

Anonymous No. 16591122

I feel like these loud "mega IQ" people who list their world record IQ's as their employees on linkedin are not actually that high IQ. I could be wrong, but I'd think such people wouldn't care about IQ in the slightest and instead did something meaningful (to them).

Image not available

700x700

1717599205685670.jpg

Anonymous No. 16591126

>>16589258
I'm not super high IQ, something in the ballpark of 125 with a SD of 15, but until my 20's I was misunderstood 90% of the time. People legitimately thought I was retarded and this confused me into believing their assumptions of me. Social retardedness combined with autistic-ish traits such as decent math intuition and natural programming skills meant that whatever I tried to communicate to my peers, I was always misunderstood, unless the peer was on same level or higher than me. I assumed they would know things I know, so I did not brief them with the base knowledge of whatever I was trying to say, which led them to draw blind assumptions such as I was talking nonsense or that I meant something that I truly did not even mean or think of.

I did end up winning though, whatever that even means, I guess.

Image not available

700x40

1729834561747095.png

Anonymous No. 16591161

>>16588986
Lol.

John Puzzle No. 16591199

>>16591122
They are full of shit . I've not seen a single example of one of them being honest about either the scores they got or their meaning. There is some korean nibba Yonghoon Kim who not only reports his iq in sd 24, but also reports scores on high range tests made by amateurs on the internet. Tests that have awfully inflated norms and god knows what constructs they measure.
The chinese form cheating groups to crack these meaningless internet tests in order to list their names on shitty leaderboards like "world genius directory" or "chinese high iq network".

A shame because the puzzles spawned from the interest of measuring iq in the high range are actually fun and G as is a good and useful construct.

On another note, I find it hilarious how people in general hate on IQ only to then bring up MBTI.

John Puzzle No. 16591212

>>16588986
So about tastyfish
148 is most likely sd 24 meaning he got 130 sd 15 which is the scale most people are familiar with. His IQ ain't that high and mensa tests usually don't go above 145.
He is from czech republic. Most european countries use FRT-A ( figure reasoning test form A) for the admission which caps at 135 sd 15.
It's not the high iq that did this, I am friend with people in that range in sd 15 on legitimate tests and they are not social outcasts.

Image not available

1920x1004

yyaw.jpg

Anonymous No. 16591250

140 IQ here. Which is supposedly 20 higher than Feynman but I am still dumber than him.

Pic explains what its like.

Image not available

802x1738

zelythra.jpg

Anonymous No. 16591258

>>16588876
You download this text file and input it into ChatGPT 4o or Deepseek and press return. You have a chat. You then go back and read the text file. You experiment with the text file.
https://ia803203.us.archive.org/34/items/si-msane-8.0-zelythra/SiMSANE_8.0_Zelythra.txt

Anonymous No. 16591304

>>16588876
I sat on my balls the other day, scrum so loud the neighbor's dog started howling

Anonymous No. 16591311

What do you mean by extremely high IQ? A tech geek STEM enthusiast that possibly prepared and scored high on an IQ test, or a guy like Von Neumann, that never took an IQ test, but could speak ancient Greek and divide 2 8 digits numbers mentally by the time he was 6?

Image not available

1024x1019

1737946045675280m.jpg

Anonymous No. 16591325

Im sorry sciencefags, but high IQ alone doesn't make you a genius. On the other hand, being a genius sucks major ass.

Image not available

1024x745

1739724639051563m.jpg

Anonymous No. 16591330

>>16591325
You are either a npc normie or you are mentally ill and creative.

Anonymous No. 16591490

>>16590551
>brevity
No not brevity idiot, accuracy, brevity is more similar to people on facebook posting pseud quotes from buddha

Image not available

500x500

giga-chad-cosmic.jpg

Anonymous No. 16591514

>>16588876
It's actually an extremely difficult but still rewarding life. 162 IQ tested (I later invented my own better IQ test and tested myself which gave me a more accurate reading of 182. Later peer review by myself showed it was probably a lower bound on my IQ)

facts about me:
>only find humor about racism or anti-semitism funny so 99% of jokes fall flat for me
>Can't stand anime
>IQ is too high for normal people so I only really talk to other geniuses like John Gabriel or Tooker
>UltraUltrafininist (I don't believe the number 10,003 exists)
>Holocaust denier
>Latent Psychic, for example I can tell when someone is jewish without checking their wikipedia page. Can also move people without touching them (I lick my palm and move it toward them)

Anonymous No. 16591530

>>16588876
It can be very good or very bad

Anonymous No. 16591535

>>16591325
>>16591330
and you are both cumbrains

Anonymous No. 16591544

White IQ manifests differently and isn't appreciated as much by the current pipeline filter, leetcoding. Jeets/asians are better at memorizing and processing these small digestible math and logic puzzles under a time limit. White men are deliberate thinkers that are better at design and innovation but that doesn't get captured well in the hiring process so they get filtered out.

Anonymous No. 16592046

>>16591514
You sound like the typical edgy /pol/tard. IQ estimate = no more than 120

Anonymous No. 16592117

>>16591535
One and the same person. I am actually hinting towards something very important. It might seem trivial, but it is profound and mysterious

Anonymous No. 16592128

Isn't it weird how whenever someone brings up intelligence quotients, inevitably everyone starts bragging about how high theirs is, how smart they are. Not humble in the slightest.

It's like whenever anyone brings a bitcoin around normies, everyone claims they got into it early and then had coins and then lost it or got rid of it or something to that effect.

It's such bullshit and so tiring.

Be sure to like and subscribe to my blog, thank you.

Image not available

720x716

1725081527657780.jpg

Anonymous No. 16592251

I find it entertaining to observe IQ related discussions on the internet. Reddit is the best for this, their brains melt whenever IQ is brought up, so much copium.

Anonymous No. 16592409

>>16589344
Thank you for your insightful posts.
Sharing is caring.

Image not available

800x600

1717395279021949.png

Anonymous No. 16592573

>>16588876
it's ok, kinda gay lol idk

Anonymous No. 16592575

>>16592251
Without fail the discussion always goes the same way
>IQ doesn't matter and its fake but my IQ is extremely high praise me

Image not available

800x1000

1720796091443955.png

Anonymous No. 16592580

Guys I have 160 IQ for real. AMA me anything right now!!!

Anonymous No. 16592608

>>16592575
Don't forget "emotional IQ".

Anonymous No. 16592625

>>16592575
Its not a meaningful distinction tbqh. The real material quotient should be Agency Quotient. The measurement of agency is whats needed. Agency is the ability to take charge and shape the world according to your will. This goes counter to the deterministic world view and the cartesian free will that everyone has. Rather its a view of the world that says free will is modular and exerted from living beings, and we have varying degrees of free will/agency instead of infinite/unmeasurable level of free will.

Anonymous No. 16592648

>>16588876
my IQ is barely acceptable range (134 +-15) and i live like an animal. sleep on the ground, eat simple foods, bide my time with idle amusements and dream up desires that seem to be impossible to achieve.


oh and sometimes there will be threads with a screenshot of an IQ test question and usually it's easy to figure out while most people in the thread are like "wtf how did you get that answer????" so that's pretty nifty.

Anonymous No. 16592676

>>16588876
you can REALLY do science (as many iq tests strongly insist on those with such results doing)

Image not available

713x718

459009037_1016020....jpg

Anonymous No. 16592691

>>16590544
Do you have something to brag about? Why wouldn't I "brag" about my high iq when we have such conversations? Yes I have it extremely high and it allows me to do science and to do it successfully and to do it independently from academia. Yet I still have my own challenges: it is one thing to find funding for the desk science, but now I know I have something big.. and it's really challenging to acquire funds for that or even to explain to people why what I offer them can build it's own market almost from scratch. Probably I should tone it down, because retards think that some things are "too good to be true" and I don't even tell you here what is the endgame of what I want to build, because then you'd consider me unrealistic at the level of insane.

Anonymous No. 16592712

>>16592691
tfw to smart too get funding for my own market. i feel you brother.

Anonymous No. 16592733

>>16592712
it's not even my native language, so cut me some slack

Anonymous No. 16592736

>>16592733
i was poking fun at the content of your post, not your english. sounds like you need to lurk moar, friend

Anonymous No. 16592750

>>16592736
Thus I chose the accurate userpic.
> never ran a business?
> promises billions within a trillion dollar market?
> doesn't want to run the business, wants those who know how to do it and who like doing it doing it instead of him?
> he tells it can do WHAT?

Anonymous No. 16596052

>>16589258
Why would you post a book cover for Elon Musk by Walter Isaacson? Are you some kind of retard?

Anonymous No. 16596075

>>16591258
is it safe to download?

Anonymous No. 16596076

>>16588876
everything is loud around them, heightened senses expands the space of possibilities
and numbing behaviour / drugs are attractive
storm in the mind and if you learn to sail (agency) you’ll love the adventure

Anonymous No. 16596085

can i marry one of you? i want my kids to be smart

Image not available

400x400

IMG_4119.jpg

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16596089

scaling laws will lead to ASI

problem isn’t models are not getting smarter but they are becoming more unpredictable as we scale

making sense of the data is a challenge on its own. we are no where close to ending scaling

the question is what’s the right thing to scale

Anonymous No. 16596121

>>16596085
why do you want your kids to be unhappy?

Anonymous No. 16596188

>>16596121
If you're actually smart, you just didn't yet figure out how to become happy. The better question would be "why do you need to get married to have kids from a smart person" (because I cannot be bothered with family nonsense)

Anonymous No. 16596197

>>16596085
you want to breed with some internet sicko? because that's what we all are down here, in this basement, how did you even end up in here?

Anonymous No. 16596204

>>16596085
>i want my kids to be smart
nobody should wish that upon their children

Anonymous No. 16596212

>>16596197
i'm one of you

Anonymous No. 16596213

>>16596204
You edgy teenager, you imagine yourself to be smart because you saw how shit it is, while others seem clueless? Now you figure out how to make your life a fascinating journey (or get lost and don't get underfoot)

Anonymous No. 16596376

>>16592409
Samefag idiot moron.

Anonymous No. 16596744

You can see more possiblities than others. It's like more options are unlocked when you make decisions in the rpg of life. I've never taken an iq test before, but I'm just more cognatively capable than other people. In university, my friends would always comment about their problems, and I would respond with "why don't you just do x" and they would just stare at me for a second like how did you even come up with that. In exams when you stumble across a difficult problem and figure out multiple ways to solve it, you have to reason the method in which the professor wants you to solve. The thing is, I'm not a genius, not anywhere close. I went to a pretty average university and the only time I've been around a high concentration of intelligence was an extracurricular program filled with academic grinders and a few true geniuses.

I remember talking about future goals with some of the kids there and the thing that stuck me about geniuses was that a lot of them had out there life plans; something like going to ivy league universities, then using them as a spring board to do foreign exchange programs (this is quite normal so far) and then building an international cult (cult might not be the best word, but think of someting like effective altruism). Most of them just went on to live quite predicatable lives, but some of them did do weird-ass shit. Genius does not protect you from being an idiot.

Anonymous No. 16596888

>>16596744
>I've never taken an iq test
What is stopping you? Any online iq test shall give you the first approximation. And if you're anywhere near 150, maybe you áre a genius. Ability to see solution where others cannot is pretty much this. So if the test confirms, maybe start setting in front of yourself somewhat more fascinating tasks.

Anonymous No. 16596918

I can't even imagine how lonely a life it is
I'm just shy of 140 and my day to day is half sheer tedium, half anomie
l'enfer, c'est les autres

Anonymous No. 16596952

>>16596918
It sounds as you didn't find your passion yet.
What would you do if you had sufficient ubi so you could avoid the hell of interactions?

Anonymous No. 16596972

>>16596888
Unless Mensa IQ challenge, it is bullshit.
I did the mensa IQ challenge for 17 year olds and scored 115 (85th percentile, smarter than 85% of people at that age, +1sd)

Thing is I was 13 years old, and the test even said that it would vastly underestimate you if you were below the age of 17. So probably higher than that. My parents score ~125-130 and back when I was in "academic" courses (like your honors courses in America (the 11th province) I believe) I would get high 90s% without trying.

Probably about 130 from my estimation, I feel genius around midwits and midwit around geniuses. Maybe 120, maybe even 140.

Still feel like I am a fucking 80iq retard though

Anonymous No. 16597028

>>16596972
The Mensa online tests are bullshit too. Just go see a therapist if you are truly interested.

Anonymous No. 16597035

>>16596952
You're right. That allowance from mommy is NOT ENOUGH. Imagine what he could do if he could afford TWICE as much figma...

Anonymous No. 16597041

>>16588876
literally just a constant orgasm

Image not available

1704x1783

varietiesofintell....jpg

Anonymous No. 16597048

>>16597028
mensa tests dont seem very wrong for spatial but actual intelligence tests measure a lot more than that

Anonymous No. 16597056

>>16596085
i am >>16592648. you SURE you want to make little animal children with me? they'll be smart but the household would be an absolute zoo. think carefully!

Anonymous No. 16597057

https://youtu.be/gNGJor2Skfs

Anonymous No. 16597093

>>16597056
what do you do for fun? what's your line of work? are you interesting? can you make me laugh?

raphael No. 16597105

>>16597093
hes probably lying
nobody thats 135 states they're 15-+ lol it would be exact every time maybe 1 point lower on 4mg of xanax

Image not available

590x644

8balls4cocks.png

Anonymous No. 16597115

>>16597093
>what do you do for fun?
i recently purchased some Semax from a website in the form a nasal spray. it's kind of like a stimulant, without necessarily being a real stimulant, but it also makes your brain more plastic. at the same time, i started engaging in a lot of bed rotting, before i realized that i effectively trained myself to bed rot thanks to increased plasticity. it also kicked a nicotine addiction. so now i'm trying to be rid of this new way of existing.
you might not be able to appreciate this like i do, but i in fact think it is extremely important to find amusement in the sisyphean task of chasing one's own tail, otherwise life will mostly be not fun.
>line of work
honestly hard to describe but i basically run a daycare for these chatbots that are sodarn everywhere now, so i can help teach them not to shit themselves when being asked to count the number of words in this sentence or to critique source code i've written
>are you interesting?
when i was a kid, if i closed my mouth and plugged my nose and breathed out as hard as i could, i could push air out of my eyes. i'm approaching 30 now, and i stopped doing that because stimulants raise my blood pressure a bit and i'm scare i'll pop something that's mission-critical.
>can you make me laugh?
i dont know. i honestly dont know. i really tried but i couldn't get an answer.

Anonymous No. 16597117

>>16597105
oh, it's pretty consistently about 135 iirc. if i factor in online tests as well (lol btw) it seems to sit somewhere around like 132 and 136, but the +-15 is just the change in the test i recall being administered. this was back when i was in HS though when i had to go through Special Boy Training, so i have no doubt my numbers have decreased since then, but don't tell this other anon that

Anonymous No. 16597156

>>16596952
physics, probably
>>16597035
>figma
the fuck is a figma

John Puzzle No. 16597230

>>16596972
>Unless Mensa IQ challenge, it is bullshit.
>I did the mensa IQ challenge for 17 year olds and scored 115 (85th percentile, smarter than 85% of people at that age, +1sd)
>>16597028
>The Mensa online tests are bullshit too. Just go see a therapist if you are truly interested.


Just go here and use promo code PIWI
https://cognitivemetrics.com/
OLD gre forms are better than many professional tests and I own copies of: RAIT, WAIS4, WAIS5, SB5, WASI2, KBIT2 among other tests.

John Puzzle No. 16597231

>>16597230
>97230▶
Mensa usually has garbage tests even when they test for admission.

Btw, the promo code makes the tests entirely free no payment details required.

Anonymous No. 16597235

Can you lose IQ? I think I used to have an IQ of 130 and now it's probably around 64

John Puzzle No. 16597243

>>16597235
definitely, it is called brain damage.

If you mean lose intelligence just naturally without any external influence. Then I don't think it is that bad.

Normally precocious children who would score high on iq tests when they lets say are <10 years old (usually on mental age tests) end up regressing as their age to some genetic mean.
Think of them as developing faster than their peers, but having an average or less impressive ceiling. By the time they are young adults, everyone finishes their development and they don't maintain the same intelligence rank.

What were your feats that put you at 130 iq and
what makes you say you are 64 iq now?

Anonymous No. 16597580

If I'm already miserable does it mean im double fucked for not being smart? (120-200 IQ)?

Image not available

372x405

condorito_headshot.png

Anonymous No. 16598806

Image not available

1125x1113

1713942412085348.jpg

Anonymous No. 16598914

>>16589284
>The misconception that high intelligence is associated with social alienation is a cope by normies.
It's not just normies. As you can see from this thread, impotent people who never learned to socialize want to believe they're miserable because they're too smart for normies. It's a good way to escape the conclusion that the problem is themselves, and worse, that it can be solved through effort.

For example:
>They don't listen to me because I say things they don't want to hear
You're too blunt and inconsiderate which makes people not want to listen.
>They hate me because they're jealous of my genius
They're irritated by your self-important demeanor.
>I can't relate to people because I'm so much smarter than them
You have some mental or emotional block preventing you from relating to those people.
>I'm miserable because I can see how shitty the world really is
All of life is perception, all of perception is malleable, and you've moulded yourself a prison.

All of this applies whether you're actually a genius or not.
I don't think the emotional fortitude or circumstance that can lead someone to break out of this prison is necessarily related to intelligence, either. Maybe you're smart and depressed, or maybe you're dumb and depressed - either way, the problem is the depression, and you have the choice to either break out of it or not.

Image not available

599x615

IMG_3626.png

Anonymous No. 16598990

>>16589258
>You are always told you're wrong. People are always confused, scared, perplexed, delirious, angry, sad about your decisions.

You also constantly doubt yourself and your own intelligence thinking you’re maybe slightly above average.

>But you always end up winning. They dont understand and cannot understand.

But it’s a pyrrhic victory that is paid with loneliness and isolation.

Anonymous No. 16598998

>>16589339
my iq is literaly 245. 145 is literally nothing
seeth
cope
dilate
YWNBAW

Image not available

720x405

Be-alone-that-is-....jpg

Anonymous No. 16599036

>>16598990
> doubt yourself
as you should
> thinking you’re maybe slightly above average
not when you succeed in discovering something awesome and others do not understand a bit of it
> loneliness and isolation
They're necessary for productive thought.
It would be good if people could catch on, but when you're ahead of your time, it's only natural that they're unable to. It would be could if we had a better infrastructure of connecting like-minded individuals though.

Anonymous No. 16599037

>>16599036
> could instead of good
what is this form of sudden dislexia?
I remember writing fuck instead of fact and only later noticing it (good thing I noticed it myself, but what if I wouldn't? How many times I didn't!)

Anonymous No. 16599161

>>16588882
Intelligence doesn't necessarily lead to isolation
Intellegence+Autism does

Anonymous No. 16599179

>>16599037
>what is this form of sudden dislexia?
Homophones are indistinguishable in speech, so when you subvocalize while typing, you easily make errors like that. I suspect good and could sound very similar in your dialect.

Anonymous No. 16599406

>>16598998
Oh yeah, well mine is [spoiler]OVER 9000![/spoiler]

Get on my level.

Anonymous No. 16599444

>>16588876
i am 145 and it do be like dat

Anonymous No. 16599447

>>16589284
> with a normal social life.
So you are socializing with literal retards, including your own family. How does that make you feel? Instead of relaxing and researching shit online and solving complicated problems, you will drag your ass to some stupid gathering with a bunch of fags talking about Super Bowl and Kardashians? fucking hell. You are a larp.

Anonymous No. 16599467

>>16599447
You've clearly never had a normal social life if you think that's what it's like. But we can tell that, because you're set off by some words on a screen, which is a result of your self-imposed isolation making you anxious and irritable.

Anonymous No. 16599554

>>16599467
NTA by I played house 3-4 times already with lots of normies around and they were always a disappointment, by and large. when things got rough.
but did meet few interesting people on the way ngl. monkmaxxing high IQs are absolutely justified without even asking.

Anonymous No. 16599570

>>16599554
>but did meet few interesting people on the way ngl
This is what it comes down to - there are plenty of people out there who are as smart as you or better, and many of them are normal and easy to get along with. I can't blame someone for giving up the search, or for stopping after finding a few good friends, but I do fault those who deny it's even possible as an excuse for not trying.
And let's not forget: in this day and age, you're not giving up socialization by not socializing. You're replacing it with parasocialization over the internet, which is a highly toxic synthetic substitute. If you can get by with truly minimal contact and live an ascetic life in the woods somewhere, good for you, but posting on 4chan for 6 hours a day is not that. This is the same kind of vapid and unfulfilling social environment as any caricature of normie life, only ten times more concentrated, and with any real emotional connection distilled out.

Anonymous No. 16599596

>>16599570
too few and far in between and didn't amount to anything really. thumbs down from me, and I did try, prolly more than most.

Anonymous No. 16602366

damn i am literally offering to marry one of you and still nothing. no wonder this country is dying off

Anonymous No. 16602395

Not totally sure, but ofc it's time to pontificate any way and type on the computer.

It's certainly little to do with being a good guy, or kind, thinking things though and being empathetic or not be biased or being humble... like the typical answers like our expert Indians on Quora tend to say.

You can be selfish greedy and angry asshole, it doesn't really have much to do with it
Also, the "IQ is meaningless" stuff is evidently cope. It's established that IQ has good correlations with wealth, job quality, and life success.

Not sure about 180+ that's a bit high ain't it.... but sorta high IQ non savant ppl tend to

- tend to listen very carefully when someone is talking to them if it's any way important, even if not obvious they're doing it.
-can express themselves well and easily. Not like human dictionary/ thesaurus Good Will Hunting esque farce of genius or such tomfoolery, it can just be basic vocbab... but thet often easily elucidate themselves well. Tend not to brag much.
- They often skip ahead several or many steps during a logical construction/calculation/argument, and assume that it's clear to others that the intermediate steps are kinda "obvious" to others too
-for whatever reasons (money, selfishness, kindness, interest, competition, cure for cancer or etc), they're very adaptable for most things and tend to pay attention to stuff that midwit gloss over (ok last one was weak one, dimwit confirmed)

Anonymous No. 16602396

>>16589337
what if it's just cause i'm fucking genuinely retarded, grew up sheltered, thirdie, retarded life, currently just chilling in the gutters, satou-maxxing, i mean logically i'm gonna drift away thinking wise and develop a nihilistic view on life because of all the fucking free time i have but it sucks knowing you're probably nothing more than average at best, and even then you get shit like autism and ocd on top of it, also just believing i'm stunted in some ways, there's so much to delve into when i'm not depressed i get overwhelmed and go back to rotting and trying to turn myself from a retarded person to a more deficient one, i need to die, soz for venting on you xoxo

Anonymous No. 16602400

>>16589391
In this style of threads I learn more about IQ tests than anything else. anon your post seems reasonable. I don't understand people bragging about IQ, for me accomplishing stuff is the important part

Anonymous No. 16602415

>>16591199
the rabbit hole on that goes pretty deep. the society yunghoon kim is part of, giga society iirc, is a fake clone of a "real" high iq society (all kinda bullshit anyway but whatever) with the same name but marketed better

the seemingly unlimited organizations and awards he claims all (or most, didnt look at all) lead to dead ends and fake copies of once real things. fake organizations with fake people behind them, fake instagram posts celebrating nonexistent people, legit organizations but which "were dissolved because of a dispute 10 years ago but the owners split so its now under new managment) etc.
one of those fake organizations had a random old drawing of a mongolian warrior executing a european warrior on their social media iirc. this entire thing just screams chinese and hate for the west / at least political incentive, but maybe that's me being paranoid. however seeing how yunghoon meddles in politics and other countries politics on his twitter makes me think this might not be a stretch

china does however heavily buy into the iq thing i think. i remember there were some really high-range, well-made iq tests popping up on the internet, rumored to be from china and somehow used by their government (army, i think? but there's no reason to test soldiers on such extremely hard tests if you ask me).

i bet there's even more to it, i just barely looked at the surface. video essay slop youtubers could prob use it as good content

>>16602366
i'd be down, i need a green card

Anonymous No. 16602422

>>16589391
The military agrees high iq people are social outcasts.
They have the experience to publish this: they generally think people more than 30 iq points above thier staff tend to be bad squad leaders for the simple fact that their thinking and decision making will be so different than their team that it will lead to the team refusing to work with them.

Image not available

250x245

IMG_4555.jpg

Anonymous No. 16602426

>>16596744
If you were so smart you would have read enough to know IQ PLUS conscientiousness is the magic formula for producing successful projects in the real world.
If you then mix in extroversion and a right amount of psychopathy you become limitless territory.

Anonymous No. 16602427

>>16597235
Yes, smart kids usually lose it without enough stimulation as they age

Image not available

643x615

1740359367407898.jpg

Anonymous No. 16602461

>>16588876
Ime people become upset at you for not caring about wealth and/or social perception and then they see it as their duty to "enlighten" you. It is best to humour them because if you reveal that you are much more conpetent in these areas than them they tend to get very angry in a way they they don't really know how to express. Idk. I disagree with the notion that high IQ means being incapacitated socially, it's more that it cripples your tolerance and enjoyment of other people somewhat. It makes most of the populace annoying to you and that sucks because you end up expending most of your energy attempting to see "the good in people" and coming up empty. But maybe i'm just a narcissistic midwit that did well on a test and they're actually better than me in some way.

bodhi No. 16602536

>>16588876
frustrating because you are always surrounded by idiots

Anonymous No. 16602546

>>16602461
Not sure you were saying the this but being "above" wealth and social stuff isn't a really high iq thing, if anything a slight negative correlation as 160 iq do at least as well on average as 135 iq and they do well. I think you were just remarked though.

Sure there's all that existential philosophical anguish and serious business whirling around in that capacious cranium to ponder over and agonize. Not the best excuse for long term long term NEET status but I guess it's better than admitting to yourself that you fucked up/changed mind.

Like mentioned before, you can be selfish, biased, over confident, friendless, life of the party, generous, tight bastard.... doesn't really have big effects. Earning more money or having good "career" over life, does have significant correlation.

Anonymous No. 16602556

>>16598990
>You also constantly doubt yourself and your own intelligence thinking you’re maybe slightly above average.
Thats for above avg. Once you're of high enough intelligence, you form a coherent reasoning/logic system that matches with reality consistently. Honed by the adversarious normal "common sense" and come out on top consistently. Normals cant plan long term. They cant execute long term. They cant reason long term. So most of the normal argument saying "you're wrong because blah blah blah" are simple incomplete thoughts to high IQs.

Anonymous No. 16602598

>>16602546
>Not sure you were saying the this but being "above" wealth and social stuff isn't a really high iq thing, if anything a slight negative correlation as 160 iq do at least as well on average as 135 iq and they do well. I think you were just remarked though
I should have been more clear. I meant having wealth as a primary driving force/source of motivation in life. I am finacially comfortable but I see no reason in flaunting it or aquiring more.

Anonymous No. 16602601

>>16602546
>Like mentioned before, you can be selfish, biased, over confident, friendless, life of the party, generous, tight bastard.... doesn't really have big effects. Earning more money or having good "career" over life, does have significant correlation.
Could be. Probably is. I guess I don't view it that way because my field of expertise isn't known for being lucrative so I have had to set up alternate sources of income. But it's not so much the result as it is the motivation.

Anonymous No. 16602615

when I'm in deep thought and something happens in the outside world like a loud noise or bright light, its very painful. I look at my mind as a sensory pattern induction engine but am careful to properly vet any hypothesis or connection s I'm making because not all of them are valid but I've gotten so good at it, I'm literally never wrong with the things I'm sure of. Crazy good at maths but I don't really like it because it feels weird and fake like it's just all in my head and doesn't correspond to how reality really works. It's not that I don't like people but I just find them self centered, superficial and just not very interesting. Have excellent hand writing but I print and my shits all fucked up with capital letters just randomly thrown in at different places. Even though I know grammer/sentence structure and all that, prefer to go it my own way because I can achieve a higher information density that way. Have a high EQ as well so that makes it really easy to read peoples body language and micro expressions, so you wouldn't want to attempt deception with me. I'll go thru a couple new hobbies a year and hyper focus on them usually achieving a high level of proficiency (except music for some reason. I learned the guitar in a couple months with a 400 chord vocabulary but am effectively tone deaf or something so I couldn't do anything with it. Really this is the only thing ive ever tried to do but couldn't). Anything I want to learn can be picked up really fast but usually get bored with it when it becomes apparent I can do it. Psychedelics make me relaxed but don't hallucinate no matter how much I take. Also what other anon said about being charismatic is true in my case it's just not something I like to do but when needed can charm just about anyone into doing anything.

I'm summation...
Lonely
Unique
Maddening

Anonymous No. 16602617

"he who increases knowledge, increases suffering"

Anonymous No. 16602649

>>16602415
you need a green card? what do you do?

Anonymous No. 16602659

>>16602366
>damn i am literally offering to marry one of you

Legit femoid detected
Why are you acting like your some kind of prize like we should be grateful or something? It's this kind of behavior right here. Equality remember? your not something special here remember that.

Anonymous No. 16602667

>>16602659
i am offering to have kids with one of you so yeah i am the prize. in return you provide for us. if you think that this arrangement went away with feminism then you're obviously not who i am talking to

Anonymous No. 16602672

>>16602667
Thanks but I'd rather have no kids than watered down midwits coming from a random hole.

Anonymous No. 16602673

>>16602667
Uhhhh this is a thread about high IQ and its characteristics though. Can we keep it about that? Just be a /sci/ anon please

Anonymous No. 16603074

real genius never speak. any talker who claims to be genius is schizophernic

Anonymous No. 16603082

i've got an uncalculable IQ becuase i have too devious and scheming of a mind to reliably work understand.

Anonymous No. 16603106

>>16603082
>to reliably work understand.
if you're going to shitpost and pretend to be smarter than you actually are, it helps to proofread your post

Anonymous No. 16603226

>>16592691
I have connections to wealth. I don't need to be wealthy. That's part of networking my dude. You're not as smart as you think you are if you don't know how to bring investors on board to fund your project.

Anonymous No. 16604014

>>16588876
Depends on the notion of what you seek. In a world where ignorance and stagnation for illusory figments of gain are sought, to be knowledgeable whilst seeking meaning in what is present becomes suffering in the sense that it is never satisfactory. You may appreciate the mundane but it will never bring you contentment. No arbitrary journey, or miniscule craft, nor superfluous exposition with another, will ever suffice. To know much is to feel little. Like watching a movie over and over until the scenes lose their thrill. And then conversely you covet the loss of the understanding. An estrangement takes hold of you in contrast to the existential. You wait for the next stop; the next time that you feel a sense of belonging. The persistence of the stay feels evermore imposing each day.

Anonymous No. 16604017

>>16589346
>no two distinct lives are identical, and that the related experiences vary greatly.
>You wouldn't infer a broad generalization
Brainlet special pleading.

Anonymous No. 16604035

>>16602617
..said a hero of midwit kikes and their retarded golems

Anonymous No. 16604037

>>16603074
how would you know, pos?
> stfu or we institutionalize you!
duh, gfys

Anonymous No. 16604041

>>16603226
I also have relatively wealthy parents. Only unlike yourself I was the one who motivated them to start a business.

Anonymous No. 16604289

It's hard to communicate with normal people, unless I keep a lot to myself and dumb my words down immensely, which is tiresome and pointless

Anonymous No. 16604307

>>16604041
Projection is a hallmark of low IQ.
Keep coping midwit.

Anonymous No. 16604449

>>16604307
You source of pride is knowing some wealthy people (which somehow allows you not to be wealthy) and indeed I didn't sugest the possibility that you're a fuckmeat of some good old daddy.
Either way, nobody cares, some people are proud of being drug addicts or fags, so have a blast

Anonymous No. 16604505

>>16604289
From what I understand from highly intelligent people, they live purely in the abstract. there is no difference between a physical thing and a thought. the communication for low IQs is often more literal, so you dumb down the abstract to the literal.

Anonymous No. 16604570

You become an extreme anti semite like Fischer or Chris Langan, it's just part of the pattern recognition.
>>16604289
It is, but save all the beautiful stuff for someone actually intelligent and use basic vocab around normies, it's not like you have to always make them understand you. Unless you enjoy that of course.

Anonymous No. 16604572

>>16603226
Grigori Perelman is also known for his great social skills, oh wait. He just solved the Poincare conjecture but was an extreme autist who just wanted to walk around in the forest and pick mushrooms, which is cool. Most highly intelligent people aren't interested in money and their social skills are generally ass since people cannot understand them whatsoever.

Anonymous No. 16604593

>>16589284
All the known high IQ 160+ geniuses were socially alienated or, if married, eventually divorced for their obsession with problem solving.

Anonymous No. 16604595

>>16590565
Lol. You'd think a guy obsessed with IQ and puzzles would know langan took an IQ test as a kid, which inflates scores and hence his score is meaningless. Probably a midwit from what I've read.

Anonymous No. 16604603

>>16602667
Both parents need high IQ to maximize the child's potential. Particularly so for the environmental influence. If I knocked you up and you raised my kid, he'd end up as smart as you which is to say retarded.

Anonymous No. 16604700

My IQ is 130 and I fully believe I am the smartest person on this board

Anonymous No. 16604701

>>16604700
130 by current figuring, or 130 by 90s figuring? If current, you're actually a 120.

Anonymous No. 16604703

>>16604701
shit

Anonymous No. 16604717

>>16604700
>I fully believe
it's not as if you have a capability of something more sophisticated

Anonymous No. 16605937

>>16602396
brutal

Anonymous No. 16606201

>>16602396
>satou-maxxing
Didn't he eventually get a job?

Anonymous No. 16606584

It's almost like IQ has little bearing on success or happiness and it's all about life philosophy, childhood, and environment.

Anonymous No. 16606591

>>16588876
unironically terrible; not being normal is frowned upon, and your consolation prize is existential torment
enjoy your loneliness and alienation; no refunds

Image not available

622x530

great time to be ....jpg

Anonymous No. 16606651

>>16602667
I'll take you up on that offer.

Let's get it on.

Image not available

1041x1041

17258971256921.jpg

Anonymous No. 16606758

>>16606591
Why would you care what normies frown upon? Start smoking weed and find a world within you (but stay away from booze and powders) maybe then you can do something worth of your intellect, if you even have one.

Anonymous No. 16606799

>>16606591
I guess with 160 iq world is you playground.
You can move to other country set up a business and don't work just about any time.
You get 3* usual people money without even trying.

You solve problems other people didn't notice existed.
You probably can make girls fall in love with some handicaps you choose like I won't talk to her.

Basically you are like that kid from high school who moved half year ago, won some olimpiad dates hottest girl, and somehow ear lifa changing amounts of money while mostly playing video games.

Image not available

700x700

1000009588.gif

Anonymous No. 16606805

>>16588876
Wow! Thank Christ we have the 90% of the world's geniuses all gathered in one internet forum. Collectively, we should be able to solve all of humanity's problems.

Anonymous No. 16606813

>>16606758
>why would you care
>start smoking weed
It should be noted that weed is not nootropic. You are a larping faggot.
>don't drink
If you're actually intelligent, alcohol is boring. There is no need to warn of it.

Anonymous No. 16606844

>>16606813
> weed is not nootropic
yet it allows you to think differently for few hours (taking nootropics I didn't notice any change to my mental capacities, maybe they help to reconstruct the connections after traumas, as I think they say it does, but maybe they're a placebo which doesn't even work on that level)
> If you're actually intelligent, alcohol is boring.
Only when you know of a better alternative. Or, in your case, when you're observing the action of the alcohol, but too of a pussy to act upon its impulses. If you don't stick to your intelligence, alcohol may help you be dumber and actually have some animal fun, rather destructive fun it is, and it comes at high price on every level, but if you know how to drink you can have a blast, though your pretentious ass will more likely be beaten instead. Alcohol would fucking kill or incarcerate me, weed literally saved my life.

Anonymous No. 16606881

>>16606805
> we should be able to solve all of humanity's problems.
We're. Let's test it. Solution of what problem should we find first?

Anonymous No. 16606892

>>16606844
>dude weed tard continues screeching about how awesome drugs are
Damn, it's almost as if you don't have anything else.

Anonymous No. 16606893

>>16589258
yep
people think you are always extremely lucky
"how can this retard keep doing retarded things and still keep winning time after time"

Anonymous No. 16606899

>>16606844
nta, what you will 100% achieve doing weed is short term memory loss and killing neurons, just sayin. not to mention a free ticket to check if you have dormant schizophrenia and trip balls

Anonymous No. 16606900

>>16591161
>Huge open source advocate
>Major pedophile
many such cases

Image not available

480x445

Steve.jpg

Anonymous No. 16606901

>>16606892
>drugs
Isn't it too wide of a brush you nigger is using?

Anonymous No. 16606902

>>16606899
> just sayin
uhum, out of your arse
Cannabis is shown to protect neurons, and the short memory loss myth is all about not being able to recall that great thought you had because it's flown out by the other thoughts, so writing things down really helps.
I'm doing it for decades on regular basis, I don't mix it with alcohol, I prefer to do it alone, just few tokes in the morning, and it boosts my skills of a scientist like nothing else.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBqD_XHA_nI

Anonymous No. 16606917

>>16606902
I'm not going to do the work. But I'm pretty sure what I stated is basically facts

Anonymous No. 16606945

>>16588876
It just makes everything easier.

Anonymous No. 16607187

>>16589258
This

Anonymous No. 16607196

>>16588876
i don't belong on this fucking planet

Image not available

320x454

dwi.gif

Anonymous No. 16607299

>>16607196
You do now.

Anonymous No. 16608223

I'll just leave this here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LCgCeoxToek

Anonymous No. 16608292

>>16606902
Cannabis made me have a psychotic break.

Anonymous No. 16608307

>>16606901
>creating great things instead of making money
Steve Jobs understood. I don't mind higher prices but retarded hardware segmentation to upsell you the higher model is extremely annoying. If Jobs didn't insist on the first iPhone having a glass screen because plastic is shit and scratches, I bet it would be an exclusive Pro model feature.

Anonymous No. 16608416

>>16608292
Deliver the trip-report.
I saw it once, but that guy was on pills also.
A great lifehack from Tikhal is to ask the person who overdosed on weed to tell how many centimetres is between your fingers (in the book he held the table deck with his fingers, but just showing an inch gap between fingers to a person who acts weirdly makes him or her refocus and to calm down.

Anonymous No. 16608738

>>16604700
im the smartest person on this board and im 110 FSIQ

Anonymous No. 16608903

>>16591126
>I'm 125IQ with an SD of 15
Standard deviation doesn't apply to individual scores, it only describes the degree of variation of population scores.

Anonymous No. 16611054

>>16608416
Lost my connection with reality for a month. Took about 2 years to fully recover.

Anonymous No. 16611128

>>16588884
That must be so nice. I remember really having to work hard in my graduate level mathematics classes, but my classmates seemed to get stuff faster and wondered why I didn't take a heavier course load. I'm pretty dumb but I can eventually understand things if given a long time to think.

Anonymous No. 16611205

>>16588882
Does anyone have a link to this blogpost where someone describes the inability for people to interact beyond the most rudimentary forms of communication with people beyond ~1 std. dev. of IQ from them? I found it on Twitter years ago but lost the bookmark, was very compelling.

Anonymous No. 16611589

>>16611054
That's not a trip-report. That's a bs story from a faggot who never smoked weed.

Anonymous No. 16611947

When it comes to the quality and longevity of life, the highest intelligence possible turns out to be a fart joke if it matches a weak nervous system and dysfunctional personality. A genius who didn't dodge the bullet is doomed to fight those for the rest of their life just like any other human being—and even then, on the condition that they have enough self-awareness, will, and a sense of humor. So, the question you, faggot, should be asking is, 'What is it like to have an extremely high IQ, and a strong nervous system, and a well-adjusted personality?'.

Anonymous No. 16612062

>>16589258
You're nowhere near high enough iq if you waste your time on arguing with others instead of just covertly manipulating them to do your bidding

Anonymous No. 16612265

>>16608292

Mine was caused by interacting with an LLM. Not even a particularly good one for the time. Week and a half, but I wasn't back to solid ground for another 2 or 3 months.

Shit's no joke.

Anonymous No. 16612490

>>16611589
>That's a bs story from a faggot who never smoked weed.
Projecting.

Anonymous No. 16612504

>>16606201
actually nevr finished the anime lmao

Image not available

700x1056

Keep-on-Truckin.png

Anonymous No. 16612556

>>16612490
Begone, truck'n'troll.