๐งต Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 08:16:01 UTC No. 16588948
Why haven't we found wormholes in the universe yet?Are wormholes our best chance of interstellar travel across galaxies?
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 09:03:07 UTC No. 16588992
>>16588948
biological humans aren't traveling anywhere lol
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 10:02:24 UTC No. 16589039
First somebody would need to proove that physics like on Earth works also in interstellar or intergalactic environment.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 11:03:58 UTC No. 16589078
>>16588948
wormholes require exotic matter, which doesn't exist
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 11:06:26 UTC No. 16589081
>>16588948
They don't exist
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 11:09:12 UTC No. 16589085
>>16588948
Don't think Humans have full true understanding of physics, wormholes could likely exist but our current models don't allow it.
Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 11:18:10 UTC No. 16589096
>>16589085
if they don't give you a Nobel for your reply they're clearly corrupt and low IQ.
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 08:19:50 UTC No. 16589937
my hole had worms in it this one time
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 10:02:09 UTC No. 16589990
>>16589937
Trump meds. Now.
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 12:05:47 UTC No. 16590085
>>16588948
Because they are a meme.
>>16588992
This. Only our immortal machine offspring will be able to live among the stars
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 12:13:18 UTC No. 16590093
>>16590085
>machine
what does this word mean to you?
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 12:36:26 UTC No. 16590115
>>16590093
Self sustaining things that can replicate and operate independently. I don't think anyone really knows beyond that. But this will happen, and eventually humanity will either find a way to merge with it, or be left behind
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 12:40:32 UTC No. 16590116
>>16590115
no my point is that biology is also a machine.
usually people mean metal robots, by the word "machine". failing to understand what the word actually means.
>An intricate natural system or organism, such as the human body.
human body is also a machine, defined as such in many places
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dic
>a living organism or one of its functional systems
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 12:43:43 UTC No. 16590120
>>16590115
>Self sustaining things that can replicate and operate independently.
No, McD's Ice Cream Machines can not replicate and they definitely don't operate independently whatever that means. In fact most machines are built, maintained, and/or operated by machinists, they don't replicate or act independently at all.
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 12:50:41 UTC No. 16590124
>>16590120
robots are making robots as we speak. soon without any humans in the loop.
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 12:54:20 UTC No. 16590126
>>16590124
So none of the machines actually operate independently, they all need other robots or operators to operate?
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 13:01:33 UTC No. 16590134
>>16590116
yeah, I know, I didn't mean machines as in Asimov's robots. I meant machines as in beings whose existence would never have happened without human engineering. Artificial machines maybe. Humans would be natural machines by that definition, although that also depends on what you consider natural.
>>16590120
>McD's Ice Cream Machines
This is like comparing bacteria to dolphins. And I'm not talking about the current state of affairs. We are still far away from this future, but it will happen. You just need to observe and see the ungodly amounts of resources being poured to achieve this.
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 13:07:04 UTC No. 16590142
>>16590126
a lot of systems operate independently but they don't replicate/repair.
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 13:12:23 UTC No. 16590147
>>16590134
>This is like comparing bacteria to dolphins.
No, its like comparing machines to machines.
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 13:13:45 UTC No. 16590149
>>16590142
So most machines aren't actually machines, they are systems?
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 13:14:07 UTC No. 16590150
>>16589081
Proof?
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 13:17:05 UTC No. 16590151
>>16590149
you turd, a machine is a system.
>System: A group of interacting, interrelated, or interdependent elements forming a complex whole, especially.
god fucking damn it you fucking imbeciles learn what words mean
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 13:27:44 UTC No. 16590159
>>16590151
You are dun goofed zinger
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 13:29:11 UTC No. 16590161
>>16590147
ok then I guess ants are the same as blue whales
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 13:31:26 UTC No. 16590163
>>16590149
wtf are you on lol. All machines are systems. System is a much broader term
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 15:31:30 UTC No. 16590291
>>16588992
Allegedly we do indeed have this capability and have been other places. The problem is, until the maybe the mid 90's, you had a double digit chance of arriving to your destination as gamma ray burst or as people soup.
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 19:37:53 UTC No. 16590578
>>16588992
>>16589039
>>16589078
>>16589081
>>16589096
Meet the cult of Einstein.
They are very dumb but are convinced they know everything about everything. They treat the non unified standard model as if it's infallible, don't bat an eye at the absurdity of dark matter and dark energy and above all else they worship Einstein as a god.
Make no mistake: they are in a cult and absolutely are incapable of doing actual science due to their dogmatic dedication to the infallibility of their perfect model of the universe.
Ironically their method of logic is indistinguishable from theologists preaching religion.
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 19:59:14 UTC No. 16590601
>>16590291
no doubt we'll go on Mars we just won't perform. having your air bubble with you is not the only issue, long term effects of lower gravity, and radiation in a practical setting are not yet known. our biological form is for Earth environment.
Anonymous at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 20:41:23 UTC No. 16590657
>>16590578
>They treat the non unified standard model as if it's infallible
And yet they are working to test GR from every angle, to look for deviations (gravitational waves, time dilation, Shapiro and Einstein delays, frame dragging, lensing). There would be no need to do any testing if it was assumed to be correct. They are out there doing actual science.
Please show us your controlled experiment disproving GR.
>Black_Body_Expert.png
He's so confident and yet he's never run a single experiment to test his claims.