Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 11:58:09 UTC No. 16589126

Just another Platonist.

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 19:13:56 UTC No. 16589450

>>16589116
I wish I could've seen Feynman's face when he heard that bullshit

Anonymous at Mon, 17 Feb 2025 19:48:40 UTC No. 16589469

It's actually a legit theory.
Somehow when you turn the switch, electrons on the oposite side of wire will react with the speed of light. The flow of electrons theory doesn't explain any of that.

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 02:22:28 UTC No. 16589787

>>16589116
I was under the impression that electrons are a classical means-to-an-end to explain phenomena that largely consists of continuous wave oscillation and propagation.
Isn't giving an election identity redundant?
Like saying music is comprised of discrete 'samples' that float through the air into your ears rather than the propagation of waves through the medium of air.

t. retarded anon

Anonymous at Tue, 18 Feb 2025 02:27:43 UTC No. 16589795

>>16589116
the more crazy and pointless the theory, the more taxpayer money they receive

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 02:40:48 UTC No. 16591023

>>16589469
>electrons on the oposite side of wire will react with the speed of light
Not true

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 10:36:01 UTC No. 16591279

>>16589787
>I was under the impression that electrons are a classical means-to-an-end to explain phenomena that largely consists of continuous wave oscillation and propagation.
Where the fuck did you hear that? Tell whoever said this to kill himself for being a communist.

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 10:53:57 UTC No. 16591296

>>16591279
kill himself for being a bourgeois intellectual*

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 11:03:46 UTC No. 16591305

>>16591296
No, for being a communist who seethes at QM.

Anonymous at Wed, 19 Feb 2025 11:07:40 UTC No. 16591309

>>16591305
As opposed to seething at QFT and the standard model?